I’ve just been watching the 1947 Hollywood film Carnegie Hall 
                which, in spite of a mawkishly sentimental plot, features 
                a mouth-watering line-up of cameo performances from Bruno Walter, 
                Lily Pons, Gregor Piatigorsky, Risë Stevens, Artur Rodzinski, 
                Jan Peerce, Ezio Pinza, Jascha Heifetz, Fritz Reiner, Leopold 
                Stokowski – and Arthur Rubinstein.  
              
Rubinstein, 
                    playing Chopin’s A-flat polonaise and De Falla’s Ritual 
                    Fire Dance, makes one of the strongest cinematic and musical 
                    impressions. Ramrod-backed, poker-faced and gazing from time 
                    to time into some ethereal middle distance, he is the very 
                    embodiment of the pianist as aristocratic artist. 
                  
That 
                    image – carefully cultivated by his management and reaching 
                    its eventual apotheosis in a prestigious 94-CD Arthur Rubinstein 
                    Collection (“106 hours covering his entire recording career, 
                    fully remastered and packaged together in a unique, specially 
                    designed box”) – is one of two that remain in the public 
                    consciousness today. The other is, of course, that of the 
                    bon vivant and inveterate womaniser who, at the age of 83, 
                    began an affair with a young woman 60 years his junior.
                  
But 
                    focusing exclusively on Rubinstein as a Grand Old Man of the 
                    piano is to overlook an earlier phase of his career when, 
                    if not exactly an enfant terrible, he frequently demonstrated 
                    a greater degree of flexibility, spontaneity and sheer joie 
                    de vivre than was sometimes later the case.
                  
The 
                    two concertos presented here are cases in point. 
                  
The 
                    Brahms, Rubinstein’s first recording of any concerto, emerges, 
                    in particular, with a distinctive celerity and lightness of 
                    touch. The speeds in three of the four movements are notably 
                    faster than those of his immediate contemporaries – let alone 
                    those of most performers today. Thus, the first movement clocks 
                    in at 14:35, compared to 15:53 (Schnabel, 1935), 16:04 (Backhaus, 
                    1939) and 16:15 (Horowitz, 1940) and the same picture emerges 
                    from both the Andante and the concluding Allegretto 
                    grazioso. Only in the second movement Allegro appassionato 
                    does Rubinstein adopt a tempo comparable to that of his 
                    contemporaries (though not to that of post war soloists who 
                    have frequently tended to adopt a broader - if not, indeed, 
                    a more ponderous - style). 
                  
This 
                    whole approach is, to modern ears, a novel and striking one 
                    that successfully offers an alternative viewpoint on a very 
                    familiar work. It is sad, therefore, that the original recording 
                    was not one of the best: Rubinstein later recalled how he 
                    was positioned way off at the back of the stage and the frequently 
                    acclaimed acoustics of Kingsway Hall seem, on this occasion 
                    at least and in spite of all Mark Obert-Thorn’s heroic efforts 
                    at restoration, to have been ineffectively reproduced on disc. 
                  
The 
                    opening of the state-of-the-art Abbey Road studios in 1931 
                    meant, however, that Rubinstein’s June 1932 recording of Tchaikovsky’s 
                    first concerto could be recorded in far superior and more 
                    immediate sound. Again, its abiding characteristic is innate 
                    elegance and sensitivity, coupled with a marked fleetness 
                    of foot. Rubinstein’s opening movement, for instance, clocks 
                    in at 17:52 – nearly two minutes less than Solomon’s acclaimed 
                    (and similarly un-barnstorming) 1929 recording with Hamilton 
                    Harty and the Hallé Orchestra – and, although the differentials 
                    in the other two movements are not as marked, the overall 
                    timings for the complete concerto come in at 31:05 for the 
                    Pole and 33:17 for the Briton. 
                  
Of 
                    course, the improved Abbey Road sound also allows us to hear 
                    the orchestra more clearly and my initial impression was that 
                    Barbirolli’s accompaniment is a little anonymous and bland: 
                    why, for goodness sake, was Albert Coates, still highly regarded 
                    even today for his fiery interpretations of Russian music, 
                    not employed as he had been for the Brahms? But, on repeated 
                    listening, it becomes clear that Barbirolli’s approach is 
                    far more of a piece with Rubinstein’s overall conception of 
                    the work and that he was, indeed, the correct choice. 
                  
              
This 
                is certainly an important and worthwhile addition to Naxos Historical’s 
                “Great Pianists” CDs. All the other performers and their recordings 
                mentioned above are to be found among earlier releases in the 
                series and it is now a particular pleasure to see Arthur Rubinstein 
                joining them as a worthy member of this particular pianistic pantheon.
                
                Rob Maynard