Aureole etc.

Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line

Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett

Some items
to consider

in the first division

extraordinary by any standards

An excellent disc

a new benchmark

summation of a lifetime’s experience.

Piano Concertos 1 and 2
Surprise Best Seller and now

A Garland for John McCabe


DIETHELM Symphonies

The best Rite of Spring in Years

BACH Magnificat

Brian Symphs 8, 21, 26

Just enjoy it!

La Mer Ticciati








Advertising on

Donate and keep us afloat


New Releases

Naxos Classical

Nimbus Podcast

Obtain 10% discount

Special offer 50% off

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
(THE Polish label)
Altus 10% off
Atoll 10% off
CRD 10% off
Hallé 10% off
Lyrita 10% off
Nimbus 10% off
Nimbus Alliance
Prima voce 10% off
Red Priest 10% off
Retrospective 10% off
Saydisc 10% off
Sterling 10% off

Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing

Sample: See what you will get

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Senior Editor
John Quinn
Seen & Heard
Editor Emeritus
   Bill Kenny
Editor in Chief
MusicWeb Webmaster
   David Barker
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger


CD: AmazonUK AmazonUS
Download: Classicsonline

Bohuslav MARTINŮ (1890 - 1959)
Piano Concerto No.3 (1947) [30:37]
Piano Concerto No.5 in B Fantasia Concertante (1958) [25:19]
Piano Concertino (1938) [21:29]
Giorgio Koukl (piano)
Bohuslav Martinů Philharmonic Orchestra, Zlín/Arthur Fagen
rec. 10-12 October 2008, The House of Artists, Zlín, Czech Republic. DDD
NAXOS 8.572206 [77:37]

Experience Classicsonline

There has been a revival of Martinů concertos on disc of late, beginning with Hyperion’s highly regarded series of the works for violin and orchestra (vol. 1; vol. 2; vol. 3; vol. 4) and continuing with the cello and orchestra works on the Chandos reissue that I reviewed here earlier. While both the works for violin and those for cello come out of the composer’s top drawer, the concertos for piano and orchestra are not of the same stature. Indeed, having listened to this recording several times, I cannot express all that much enthusiasm for this music. For me, the best of the three is the earliest, the Concertino, which belongs to the composer’s Parisian period. That said, for those who are collecting Martinů’s complete works, this CD is a good way to add these concertos at a very affordable price.

It is interesting that there is an exact ten-year spread among the three works on the disc. The earliest, the Concertino, is placed last and, as I noted above, it seems to me the most successful of the three. The work begins with a march-like theme and the punched out chords in the piano part are clearly reminiscent of Prokofiev. According to the notes accompanying the disc, the second movement evokes the similar movement in Rachmaninov’s Piano Concerto No. 2. I can see that but it also reminds me of the first movement in Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata with its repeated triplets. The finale is rhythmic and syncopated and more typical of Martinů, with some Poulencian hi-jinks before it concludes. The work may be less ambitious than the two official concertos, but it is better unified than they are and overall more characteristic of the composer I know and like.

The Piano Concerto No. 3 was composed for the famous Czech pianist and friend of the composer, Rudolf Firkušný, shortly after the Second World War. It is a rather Brahmsian work, with chordal writing in the piano part very similar to that in Brahms’ Second Concerto. Sample, for instance, at the 4:00 mark and again at 8:08 in the first movement and you will find yourself in the world of Brahms - or a parody of it? The second movement also is redolent of Brahms, while the lighter-hearted finale begins with a charming theme in the winds and strings and then taken up by the piano that’s unmistakably by Martinů, though before long “Brahms” makes an additional appearance. This concerto is the longest of the three, yet retains enough interest - something that cannot be said for the last work in the series.

I find the Piano Concerto No. 5 rather similar in scope to Martinů’s last symphony, the Sixth. Both have subtitles that give away their rather rhapsodic natures. The Fifth Concerto is a Fantasia concertante, while the symphony is titled as Fantaisies symphoniques. Martinů composed both in the 1950s in America, where he wrote all of his symphonies and his later concertos. As I have found the Symphony No. 6 to be rambling, so I also find the Concerto No. 5. To me it is a rather disorganized work with much note-spinning.

As to the performances, Giorgio Koukl, clearly has the measure of the pieces and projects them about as well as one could wish. Both he and conductor Fagen have considerable experience in Martinů’s music. The orchestra also accompanies well. If it does not always produce the most refined sound, it plays well in tune and obviously has the idiom in its blood. The Naxos sound is on the dry side, but again this does no harm to the music. There is no direct comparison with these particular works on disc. Firkušný made a well-respected recording with the Czech Philharmonic and Vaclav Neumann of Concertos 2-4 for RCA that may be hard to find. A disc with Robert Kolinsky and the Basel Symphony under Vladimir Ashkenazy of Concertos 2 and 4, along with other orchestral works, recently came out on Ondine. I have not heard that one, but it has secured positive reviews. If you are collecting these concertos, this new Naxos series, then, is as good a place as any to start. Just don’t expect the works to be at the same level as Martinů’s string concertos.

Leslie Wright

see also review by Bob Briggs













Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews


      Composer surveys
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site


Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure



Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Pat and present

Helpers invited!

How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips

Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Other links
Web News sites etc

A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer."-->