Aureole etc.




Nimbus on-line




If it’s the Czech works you’re after, do not hesitate

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Some items
to consider

 


Enjoy the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra wherever you are. App available for iOS and Android


Tudor 7188


Vaughan Williams Symphony 3 etc.


Lyrita New Recording


Lyrita Premiere Recordings

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage


Decca Phase 4 - 40CDs


Judith Bailey, George Lloyd


BAX Orchestral pieces


CASKEN Violin Concerto

Schumann Symphonies Rattle


Complete Brahms
Bargain price

 

 

 

 


 
REVIEW



Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical

Hyperion

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
Alto
Arcodiva
Atoll
CDAccord
Cameo Classics
Centaur
Hallé
Hortus
Lyrita
Nimbus
Northern Flowers
Redcliffe
Sheva
Talent
Toccata Classics


Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing
sample
 

alternatively
CD: AmazonUK AmazonUS


Serge PROKOFIEV (1891–1953)
Cello Concerto in E minor, Op 58 (1933-8) [36:18]
1. Andante [5:36]
2. Allegro giusto [11:39]
3. Tema: Allegro – Interludio; L’istesso tempo – Variations 1 – 3 – Cadenza – Interludio II – Variation 4 – Reminiscenza – Coda [18:36]
Symphony-Concerto in E minor, Op 125 (1952) [36:51]
1. Andante [9:53]
2. Allegro giusto – Cadenza – Meno mosso – Più animato – Meno mosso – Allegro assai [16:55]
3. Andante con moto – Allegretto (poco meno mosso) – Allegro marcato – Poco meno mosso [9:54]
Alban Gerhardt (cello), Bergen Philharmonic Orchestra/Andrew Litton
rec. Grieghallen, Bergen, 1–5 September 2008. DDD.
HYPERION CDA67705 [73:11]

 

Experience Classicsonline

 

 
This recording was welcomed by Brian Wilson in its download format, when Brian praised both the enterprise of the coupling and the excellence of the performances. It’s particularly valuable to have Prokofiev’s first and last thoughts on this work together on the same disc. In fact, I’m not aware of any comparable couplings in the catalogue and though there have been a few recordings of the Symphony-Concerto, the First Concerto is less frequently heard. That may be in part because, as Brian Wilson indicates – and I agree with him - Prokofiev’s final thoughts are to be preferred.
 
It may be helpful to summarise the genesis of both works, for which I’m indebted to David Nice’s very useful booklet note. Prokofiev was first prompted to compose a cello concerto by the great cellist, Gregor Piatigorsky. That was in 1932, when Prokofiev was living in Paris. However, work on the concerto did not proceed swiftly and it was not completed until after he’d returned to the Soviet Union. By that time Piatigorsky had no involvement with the work – did he ever play it, I wonder? – and the première was given in Moscow by Lev Berezovsky in 1938. The work was not a success and the full score remained unpublished. Then in 1947 Mstislav Rostropovich performed the work, just with piano accompaniment and, eventually, Prokofiev, encouraged by Rostropovich, determined to revise the concerto.
 
The revision was by no means a swift process - according to David Nice, Rostropovich paid lengthy visits to Prokofiev’s dacha in the summers of 1950 and 1951 and his input into the revision seems to have been significant. What Prokofiev entitled his Cello Concerto No. 2 eventually emerged and was premièred by Rostropovich in 1952. Even then the revision process was not finished and Prokofiev made a further version of the score, which is what we now know as the Symphony-Concerto, though this wasn’t heard in public in his lifetime.
 
The musical material from the First Concerto was recycled into the Symphony-Concerto and the listener will find many thematic similarities between the two works. However, structurally they are substantially different, as can be seen from the tempo indications – and timings – for each movement in the respective works, which I’ve deliberately included in the heading to this review. What we have, in essence, is two closely related but completely distinct pieces and it’s highly significant, I think, that both have opus numbers, surely a sign that the composer did not regard the concerto as being superseded by the Symphony-Concerto.
 
The structure of both works is pretty unusual though one structural similarity is that in each case the substantial central movement has scherzo-like material as its foundation, though neither is a conventional scherzo. The Concerto begins with a fairly short movement that is confident, even impassioned, in tone though, as David Nice observes, it is “little more than a striking introduction.” Quite a bit of play is made with a four-note ostinato figure, which will be instantly recognisable to anyone familiar with the ballet, Romeo and Juliet (1935). The movement that follows opens with a long stretch of incredibly busy music in which the soloist is prominent – in truth, the soloist gets little opportunity for a rest in either work. There are several sections of more lyrical material, which are sensitively rendered in this performance, but the main impression left by this extended movement is of athletic virtuosity.
 
The finale has a most odd structure. Essentially, the form is that of theme and four variations. However, as will be seen from the review heading, there are several other episodes, which interrupt the conventional variation form, including a cadenza (track 3, 6:17- 8:54) which is, in David Nice’s words, “of hair-raising difficulty”, though it starts off innocuously enough. This finale is an interesting movement and I like the way Prokofiev frequently exploits the cantabile capabilities of the solo instrument. However, the movement as a whole is somewhat episodic and discursive and I must admit I found it hard to follow the musical argument at times. But I look forward to exploring this movement – and the concerto as a whole – further, especially with such expert and persuasive guides as Alban Gerhardt and Andrew Litton.
 
The Symphony-Concerto seems to me to be a tauter composition and I find it makes a stronger initial impression on the listener. The first movement is bigger than the corresponding movement in the Concerto and it’s bigger not just in terms of length but in terms of its character too. The four-note ostinato figure, carried over from the Concerto, is even more prominent this time round. The middle movement begins and ends as a scherzo but it’s more than a scherzo, with lyrical episodes along the way that are highly characteristic of Prokofiev. The cadenza comes fairly early on in the movement (track 6, from about 6:40 – 8:09) and it sounds to me to be at least as demanding as its counterpart in the Concerto. It’s preceded by a lovely, quiet lyrical passage. The finale presents several episodes but these feel to be better integrated with one another than was the case in the Concerto and the very end of the work makes for a more convincing finish, I think, than what we heard in the score’s first incarnation.
 
Both these works make huge demands on the soloist but Alban Gerhardt seems not just to take the manifold difficulties in his stride but positively to relish them. He’s a commanding presence, impressing in the many passages where breathtaking virtuosity is required. And Prokofiev frequently writes in his typically long-breathed lyrical vein. In these stretches, Gerhardt’s magnificent singing tone and his ability to sustain an extended legato line give huge pleasure. In both works he benefits from lively, attentive support from Andrew Litton and his fine orchestra. The recorded sound is excellent.
 
The picture on the front of the booklet won’t be to all tastes – I find it hideous – but that shouldn’t put anyone off. These two works may not be as well known as Prokofiev’s concertos for violin or piano but they are fascinating pieces, containing some very fine music. It’s very valuable – and logical - to have them coupled together and these splendid performances serve Prokofiev very well indeed.
 

John Quinn
 

 


EXPLORE MUSICWEB INTERNATIONAL

Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews

 

Discographies
   Composer
      Composer surveys
   National
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
.
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

Interviews
With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site

Nostalgia

Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Comment
Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure

Announcements

 

Community
Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Reviewers
Pat and present

Helpers invited!

Resources
How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips


Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Publishers
Other links
Newsgroups
Web News sites etc

PotPourri
A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Questionnaire    
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Dictionary
Magazines
Newsfeed  
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools






Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.