I will open this review by quoting my
                      own words when reviewing Cinquecento’s disc of Philippe
                      de Monte’s 
Missa Ultimi miei sospiri last year (Hyperion 
CDA67658). “The
                      group offered some very fine singing in this rich and rare
                      repertoire as you hear right from the
                      first moment of the first track”. ‘The Times’ reviewer
                      commented about their Regnart disc (
Hyperion
                      CDA67640) that “the sextet’s vocal technique is superb,
                      in solo performances as well as in ensemble”. If you have
                      come across their previous three discs you will know all
                      of this for yourself. It still surprises me that they have
                      only been singing together for just over four years. This
                      CD in the main continues the same high standards in quality
                      of performance and recording and in the rare beauty of
                      the repertoire.
                  
                   
                  
                  The decision by Hyperion to adorn each
                      of Cinquecento’s discs with one of Archimbaldo’s extraordinary
                      flora and fruit portraits gives them a certain odd distinction.
                      The decision to record Vaet however is excellent. He was
                      a prolific composer of almost entirely sacred music including
                      nine mass settings and sixty-six motets. He died aged only
                      37 and was employed by the demanding Archduke Maximillian
                      II of Austria, a very significant patron at that time (see
                      JVV’s review of 
CDA67579). 
                  
                   
                  
The highlight of the disc and the longest
                      work is the Mass ‘Ego flos campi’ but the other items are
                      equally interesting. I was especially moved by the ‘Salve
                      Regina’ one of eight by Vaet. It is an intense work, very
                      imitative and complex but singularly beautiful and quite
                      clearly indebted to plainchant. 
                   
                  
But to the Mass which is based on a motet
                      by Clemens non Papa who was a generation older than Vaet
                      and whose motet comes, rather oddly I feel, at the end
                      of the CD. It’s worth hearing it before tackling this quite
                      lengthy mass setting. The motet is characterized by what
                      we now call a strong feeling of the pastoral major key
                      of F to illustrate the text which begins “I am the flower
                      of the field, and the lily of the valley’. Its opening
                      of a simple rising scale overlapping with the entry of
                      the next voice a fourth higher is also a feature used prodigiously
                      by Vaet. It acts as a head motif for each section except
                      for the Benedictus where it is inverted. Vaet probably
                      knew Clemens who, despite his somewhat tawdry reputation,
                      was highly considered by his contemporaries. The motet
                      is, unusually, in seven parts and Cinquecento is augmented
                      here by an extra tenor: Bernd Fröhlich. The Mass is in
                      six parts and another of its peculiarly attractive qualities
                      is the use of imitative phrases between the upper and lower
                      voices giving the piece a madrigalian quality. It rarely
                      moves out of its mode but when it does, often quite surprisingly,
                      there is a leap to the flattened 7
th in the
                      upper voice. 
                      
                  
Vaet also has a connection with Orlando
                      Lassus. Not only must they have known each other but Vaet
                      sets a text by the court poet Charles Utenhoven in praise
                      of Duke Albrecht of Bavaria (‘Antevenis virides’) who was
                      Lassus’s patron. It is, not surprisingly, a very grand
                      work and might well benefit from having the ‘gravitas’ of
                      a larger choir perform it.
                   
                  
The Magnificat is a demanding work. Some
                      of its verses are, unusually, quite intricate duets which
                      vividly convey the sense of the texts. These are sung,
                      as was common at the time, ‘in alternatum’ with the plainchant.
                   
                  
The text of the ‘Miserere mei, Deus’ comes
                      from Psalm 51 and begins “Have mercy on me, God/according
                      to your great pity”. It had been set by many but it was
                      Josquin’s version of some thirty or forty years earlier
                      that had been published and become so very well known.
                      Vaet uses the simple semi-tonal melodic rising and falling
                      phrase which Josquin had almost overworked in his setting.
                      It acts as only an occasional reminder of the plainchant.
                      A case of humanistic society moving away from its dependence
                      on the church perhaps. Another, contrasting approach in
                      the use of plainsong is found in the rich and sonorous
                      six-voice Pentecostal motet ‘Spiritus Domini’. There it
                      can be heard in long notes as a 
cantus firmus in
                      the bass.
                   
                  
That leaves just three more motets to
                      mention. Each is linked by a fairly new concept, no doubt
                      developing from the growing popularity of the madrigal,
                      that of word-painting. ‘Ecce apparebit Dominus’ concerns
                      the image of our Lord appearing in the high clouds. For
                      this Vaet begins with a strongly rising phrase overlapping
                      in fourths and fifths with other voices. If the booklet
                      notes are correct then in the contrasting “grandiose exhortation
                      of the second section”, (Jerusalem, rejoice at this great
                      day) the singers fail to characterize the music strongly
                      enough. Indeed dynamic contrast, at least not in the way
                      we now think of it is not found on the whole in this music.
                      It is therefore the way in which phrases are shaped with
                      dynamic colourings that really matters. Cinquecento do
                      this beautifully as in the brief ‘Filiae Jerusalem’. The
                      notes tell us that the “first, busy imitative point represents
                      the throng of Palm Sunday”. Again, this needs to have been
                      brought out a little more clearly. I fail to completely
                      understand this but the work appears to be a motet about
                      the religious martyrdom of Maximilian himself. ‘Musica
                      Dei donum’ is hardly a sacred text more a madrigalian,
                      humanistic one. The words “Music, the gift of the supreme
                      God,/draws men, draws gods” are set with the most mellifluous
                      phrases and sweet harmonies.
                   
                  
Vaet is a fine composer but on reflection
                      and having heard the music several times I am still not
                      sure of his real worth. It may be that even more expression
                      of the words is necessary but as I have said there is some
                      very fine singing here. I do hope however that Cinquecento
                      do not go down the same road as the Hilliard ensemble did
                      at one point in their recording career, that is to concentrate
                      too much on the sheer beauty of their sound at the expense
                      of the text. It may be the acoustic of the Austrian church
                      - I doubt it however because they have recorded there before
                      - but the enunciation and the clarity of the text is far
                      from clear. This is an area which needs constant attention
                      even amongst the greatest.
                  
 
                  Gary Higginson
                  
                  see also review by Brian
                  Wilson                  (April 2009 Recording
                  of the Month)