Egon Wellesz was born into an affluent Jewish family and had every 
                expectation of a brilliant musical career in his home city of 
                Vienna. Like many another he had reckoned without the malign intervention 
                of Hitler's Third Reich. He fled to England where he remained 
                after the war and became a noted academic much respected at Oxford 
                University and beyond. He also contributed to Grove. His symphonies 
                achieved the occasional Third Programme broadcast and at one stage 
                the conductor Hugo Rignold became something of a champion so far 
                as the later symphonies were concerned. Do not miss Paul Conway’s 
                Wellesz article on this subject.
                
The first five symphonies 
                  proclaim their roots in the great Germanic symphonic tradition 
                  with links to Schubert, Bruckner and Mahler but all increasingly 
                  viewed through Schoenberg's 12-tone 'glass'. All of them may 
                  be seen as having been liberated by the experience of the Second 
                  World War; look at the date of the first of them.
                
              
The present set is 
                the only way to hear the Wellesz symphonies. That is unless you 
                buy them piecemeal as single CPO discs. They were issued over 
                a five year period; links to the MWI reviews of the solo discs 
                are built into the header. What CPO have done, rather as they 
                did with their Pepping, 
                Yun, 
                Siegfried 
                Wagner, Frankel, 
                Pettersson, 
                Toch 
                and Atterberg 
                boxes, is to scoop the discs off the warehouse shelves, place 
                them in a new cardboard slipcase, then apply the shrink-wrap machine 
                and a much lower unit price. Very welcome too.  
              
Wellesz’s First 
                  Symphony, written when he was a Brahmsian sixty, is in three 
                  movements. The first of these has a slightly academic Bachian 
                  flavour – perhaps shades of a Stokowski 
                  organ transcription on a stern day. This is clearly a very 
                  serious piece of writing. The second movement is more carefree 
                  - a model in lucid and dancingly buzzing activity - sometimes 
                  it too slips into fugal patterning.  The final molto adagio 
                  sostenuto has genuine emotional depth; more inward and passionate 
                  than the preceding movements. The writing of this work must 
                  have been a great release because throughout the war Wellesz 
                  had been unable to write a single note of music.
                
The compact Eighth 
                  Symphony was premiered in a very different world in 1971 
                  in Vienna by Miltiades Caridis. It is a work of emotional turbulence, 
                  protesting anger and drained exhaustion. It is expressed in 
                  the free-wheeling language of dissonance and angularity rather 
                  than of Schubertian melody. A much more compact work than the 
                  First it is about two-thirds the length of the earlier piece. 
                  The Symphonischer Epilog is in much the same dissenting 
                  and fragmented style. The tense discontinuity of these later 
                  works recalls late Havergal Brian as in his Symphonies 24 to 
                  32. Wellesz like Brian had the genius to paint elusive moods; 
                  listen to the last few moments of the Epilogue - a work, 
                  rather like Brian's Symphonia Brevis, that repays repeat 
                  listening sessions. It was premiered on 13 May 1977 by the Lower 
                  Austrian Musicians' Orchestra conducted by Carl Melles.
                
The Second Symphony 
                  is the longest of the nine; the Ninth is the shortest bar 
                  the seventh. Certainly Wellesz became less discursive over the 
                  quarter century spanned by his symphonies. The Second is most 
                  impressive – a work you must hear and fascinating at every turn. 
                  This is a work of consistently high standard. This much is proclaimed 
                  by its memorably hushed Brucknerian gallop, its tender romance 
                  and noble aspect [4:40, I] and to the benevolent insurgency 
                  and infiltration of tone-rows in the least intimidating way. 
                  Its Scherzo is engagingly Nutcracker-gawky in the manner 
                  of Siegfried Wagner and Franz Schmidt. The Adagio has 
                  a grand funereal tread. The finale recalls Schubert’s Great 
                  C major and ends by juxtaposing playfulness with eldritch awe. 
                  By contrast the Ninth Symphony is succinct and resolutely 
                  dissonant – even forbidding. Yet amid the fractured mosaic a 
                  range of moods is accommodated: from striding and scorched tragedy 
                  to lop-sided humour to hauntingly acidic arching grandeur.
                
In the thorny company 
                  of the Sixth and Seventh Symphonies the Fourth, Sinfonia 
                  Austriaca declares its faith in romantic roots. With 
                  that title I was expecting something as discursive in scale 
                  and epic in mood as Furtwängler's Second, Karl Weigl's Fifth 
                  or Franz Schmidt's Second. In fact the latter is a close cousin 
                  with rustic charm meeting tortured massed violin writing and 
                  cresting French horns. The eloquent confidence of the string 
                  anthem at 3.03 in the Adagio impresses deeply. The work 
                  was premiered on 11 November 1956 in Vienna conducted by Rudolf 
                  Moralt who made a fine 1950s recording of the Schmidt Fourth 
                  Symphony.
                
Six and Seven 
                  are cut from uncompromisingly dissonant and episodic cloth. 
                  The level of challenge is similar to the symphonies of Frankel 
                  though Wellesz is more doom-laden and despairing. Havergal Brian 
                  is again another reference point. If this is organic progress 
                  its ineluctable arc is deeply subsumed. In the middle movement 
                  of the Sixth - the last five of Wellesz's nine symphonies are 
                  in three parts - he uses his hallmark method of touching in 
                  a theme by passing it note by note to different instruments. 
                  The themes themselves are not playful but speak of the distraught, 
                  the tragic. Moments of light occasionally float into sharp focus 
                  as in the rural caprice of 4.48 in the finale of the Sixth. 
                  These are dispelled by spasms and shudders of cold disrupting 
                  the winter sunshine. The Sixth ends in quiet repose while the 
                  Seventh shouts in tragedy – the brass rail in angry magnificence. 
                  Otherwise the moods of the two works have much in common. He 
                  is never dull or prolix and always displays brilliance in instrumental 
                  texture. All the same many will find this hard going.
                
The symphonies 6 
                  and 7 were respectively premiered on 23 June 1966 at Nüremberg 
                  with Michael Gielen/Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra and 21 
                  November 1968 with Hugo Rignold/City of Birmingham Symphony 
                  Orchestra.
                
The Symphony 
                  No. 3 was started one year after completion of the Second 
                  but was not premiered until 2002. The music has little in the 
                  way of surface attraction – again no easy victories. There is 
                  a Brahmsian sobriety about this and the first movement is like 
                  a Bach organ work transcribed by Schoenberg. 
                  The second is more ingratiating but rises to a Brucknerian gravity 
                  of expression. The scherzo third movement skips along almost 
                  nonchalantly with Brucknerian references peeping through and 
                  across the bar-lines ... and the sun is shining. A contented 
                  gift of a melody plays the feminine riposte to a daring masculine 
                  figure recalling the Bruckner symphonies 3 and 4. The finale 
                  has Protestant earnestness as if wanting to put behind it the 
                  ‘indecency’ of the two central movements. I must not overdo 
                  references to the Schoenberg voice but certainly the music betrays 
                  a freer approach to tonality. The work ends with a  typically 
                  terse Brucknerian  gesture.
                
Four years later 
                  came the Fifth Symphony with a similar palette to that 
                  of the Third. Again the four movements are desperately serious 
                  with strong tribute presented to Schoenberg. They only lack 
                  the contrast of the central movements of the Third. Counterpoint 
                  and fugue thread their way through this work of North German 
                  gravity. It smiles but it can be a relentless grimace. Solo 
                  voices, woodwind and violin, float free but the language is 
                  always occluded and soaked in the 12-tone argot. Intriguingly 
                  the finale with its pummelling bass-heavy sound is topped off 
                  by shrieking trumpets; a contrast to all that has gone before. 
                  It ends with an emphatic angry growl. Rabl gives a masterfully 
                  intense performance. There is even a majesty of sorts but it 
                  is of an awe-struck forbidding sort among much that is trudging, 
                  turbulent and unforgiving.
                
The conductor's 
                  notes about the recording process tells us that Wellesz's printed 
                  scores and mss were littered with errors. Time oppressed the 
                  elderly composer and a harvest of misprints and mistakes was 
                  the result. Fortunately Rabl was able to examine sketches and 
                  galley proofs at the National Library in Vienna and has made 
                  all the necessary corrections. The excellent background notes 
                  by Hannes Heher are in the usual encyclopedic CPO style.
                
              
The recordings of 
                these deeply serious and sometimes unsettling symphonies are uniformly 
                superb – lively, three dimensional and natural.
                
                Rob Barnett