|
Making
a Donation to MusicWeb
About MWI
Site
Map
More
Reviews
How to find a review
Books
Film
Music
Nostalgia
Records Of The Year
Recommendations
Comment
Arthur Butterworth Writes
Phil
Scowcroft's Garlands
Classical
blogs
Reviewers
Logs
Announcements
Don't
Go Here!
Community
Bulletin Board
Web
Ring
Reviewers
Helpers
invited!
Resources
How
Did I Miss That?
British
Composers
British
Light Music Composers
Other
composers
Indexes
Label
Masterwork
Discographies
Composer
National
Themed
Review pages
Complete Books
Programme
Notes
External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Performers
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Publishers
Other links
Newsgroups
Web News sites etc
Editorial
Board
Classical Editor
Rob Barnett
Seen & Heard
Editor and Webmaster
Bill Kenny
MusicWeb Webmaster
Len Mullenger
Assistant Webmaster
David Barker
PotPourri
A
pot-pourri of articles
MW
Listening Room
MW
Office
Helping
MusicWeb
Advice
to Windows Vista users
Questionnaire
Site
History
What
they say about us
What
we say about us!
Where
to get help on the Internet
CD
orders By Special Request
Graphics
archive
Currency
Converter
Dictionary
Magazines
Newsfeed
Web Ring
Translation Service
Rules
for potential reviewers :-)
Do
Not Go Here!
April Fools
|
 |
 |
Eleven 11s
3. General Comments
by David Barker
Comparative timings
I’m not a great believer in the idea that differences
in timings tell you much about the relative merits of different
performances. However, in a work of around an hour, where there
is a variation of more than fifteen minutes from fastest (Petrenko,
57 min.) to slowest (Rostropovich, 72), you can at least get
the beginnings of a sense of where the conductor is going.
Rather than give you exact timings, which are not helpful,
I’ve grouped them in blocks of time, with the first in
a group the fastest. Below are the times for the work as a
whole; I have placed the equivalent for individual movements
where each movement is being considered.
| < 60
minutes |
Petrenko, Barshai |
| 60-65 min. |
Lazarev, Haitink, Stokowski |
| 65-70 min. |
Rozhdestvensky, Kitajenko, Caetani, Berglund, DePreist |
| > 72
min. |
Rostropovich |
Sound and performance quality
To my ears, all the orchestras play well. There are a few instances
of ragged ensemble, and some ugly brass notes, but nothing that
mars an overall performance . I don’t think I will surprise
anyone when I say that as a demonstration of sheer orchestral
prowess, Haitink’s Congertgebouw is a clear winner.
Similarly, I can’t make fully informed judgments about
comparative sound qualities because some are from CD, others
downloaded as mp3s and others streamed. Suffice to say that the
best are the Haitink, Caetani and the Lazarev, the latter two
being hybrid SACDs, though I listened to the Caetani on a normal
CD player, and the Lazarev as a 320 kbps mp3 download.
The survey
So to the performances. Because it is such a large work, I felt
the only way to compare the eleven recordings was to do it one
movement at a time. I have to say that I found it rather challenging
to not repeat myself when trying to describe subtle, and sometimes
not so subtle, differences between performances.
|
|
Advertising
Rates
Visitor
stats
MusicWeb
International
has over 25,000 Classical CD reviews on offer
Gerard
Hoffnung Concerts &
The
Bricklayer Story

New
Releases

New
Releases




MusicWeb
sells the Polish
catalogue CDAccord
£10.50 post free W-W

MusicWeb sells the
Arcodiva catalogue
£12.00 post free W-W

£11.50
post-free world-wide
Try
it and see - Sale or Return
MusicWeb
can now offer you discs from the following catalogues:
Prices include postage
Musicweb
Special
Offers
Google Ads - for information about privacy matters, click here.
|