I have to admit to a
                      certain amount of frustration with this latest disc from
                      Oleg Marshev. So much is fine, articulately and warmly
                      phrased, and imaginatively, communicatively done. His Scriabin
                      performances are in the main examples of a superior technical
                      and colouristic mind at work, and there are times when
                      his playing is rapturously expressive. But there are other
                      times when the volatility of his playing endangers the
                      musical argument and comes at too high a cost.
                  
                   
                  
                  One
                      thinks principally of the quartet of Chopin pieces in this
                      respect. The Ballade begins well enough with an accomplished
                      unveiling of the Marshev tone, which is frequently alluring
                      and beautifully voiced. But gradually as things move through
                      the musical spine of the work a damaging thoughtlessness
                      seems to seep into his playing. Lines become blurred and
                      Marshev starts to rush with unmerciful haste, losing all
                      semblance of direction as he does so. The result is exciting,
                      certainly, but heedless of musical architecture. The Op.34
                      Waltzes are somewhat better but are vitiated by an unnaturalness
                      of rhythm. It’s a perplexing state of affairs because he
                      can be so sensitive a player. 
                   
                  
His
                      also has a trio of Liszt powerhouses to parade. 
Funèrailles is
                      brilliantly dispatched and shows Marshev’s virtuosic chops
                      in their regal glory. And yet if one turns to Earl Wild – in
                      a collection of concert recitals on Ivory Classics – we
                      find no less technical command and a rather greater sense
                      of paragraphal momentum. Where Marshev moves in fits and
                      starts Wild takes the piece in one bound. This waywardness
                      also affects the 
Rapsodie espagnole and it does
                      from time to time also manifest itself in the Scriabin
                      pieces, finely though these are played.
                   
                  
These however are certainly
                      the most impressively interpreted pieces in the recital
                      even though admirers of, say, Sofronitzky might find Marshev
                      a little too lateral and lacking in vitality from time
                      to time. In the main however his warmly textured approach
                      works well on its own terms.
                   
                  
So,
                      frustrating interpretatively although there’s no gainsaying
                      Danacord’s splendid recording or the resplendent sound
                      of the piano. 
                   
                  
                  
Jonathan Woolf
                  
                  see also review by Patrick Lam