Aureole etc.

Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line

Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Some items
to consider

Yes we are selling
Acte Prealable again!
£11 post-free

we also sell Skarbo

and Oboe Classics


with Eggebrecht we get all the excitement we can handle

Book 1 Book 2 Book3
Mota The Triptych: -Website

Asmik Grigorian

Breathtaking Performance
controversial staging
Review Westbrook
Review Hedley
Every lover of Salome should see this recording
Mullenger interpretation

absolutely thrilling

immediacy and spontaneity

Schumann Lieder

24 Preludes
one of the finest piano discs

‘Box of Delights.’

J S Bach A New Angle
Organ fans form an orderly queue

a most welcome issue

I enjoyed it tremendously

the finest traditions of the house

music for theorbo
old and new

John Luther Adams
Become Desert
concealing a terrifying message

ground-breaking, winning release

screams quality

Surprise of the month

English Coronation, 1902-1953
magnificent achievement

SACD: Crotchet AmazonUK AmazonUS


SACD: Crotchet AmazonUK AmazonUS



Gustav MAHLER (1860-1911)
Symphony No.6 (1904)
London Symphony Orchestra/Valery Gergiev
rec. Barbican Hall, London, November 2007. DDD.
LSO LIVE LSO0661 [77:11]









Gustav MAHLER (1860-1911)
Symphony No.7 (1905)
London Symphony Orchestra/Valery Gergiev
rec. Barbican Hall, London, March 2008. DDD.
LSO LIVE LSO0665 [71:55]

Experience Classicsonline

Valery Gergiev seems to divide opinion more than any other conductor currently active. Iíve seen his recent performance at the Proms of the absolutely complete Sleeping Beauty described as one of the two or three highlights of the season and dismissed elsewhere as under-rehearsed and directed as if Gergiev were on auto-pilot, thinking only of his forthcoming dash to South Ossetia. There are longueurs in any complete Tchaikovsky ballet without the dancing, but I thought the criticism of the performance unfair and unfounded; I shall certainly keep my off-air recording as an adjunct to the slightly less complete Ďcompleteí Covent Garden performance conducted by Mark Ermler - formerly on Conifer, currently unavailable.
The same debate has followed Gergievís Mahler performances at the Barbican, of which we now have two examples on disc. John Leeman described the performance of the Sixth in terms with which I thoroughly agree; rather than paraphrase him, I refer you to his Musicweb ĎSeen and Heardí review of the Gateshead concert given the day before this Barbican recording. I wasnít at either concert, but I heard the Radio 3 broadcast and was very impressed, finding Gergievís approach very similar to the one which I have come to regard as my benchmark for this work, a live performance by the Cleveland Orchestra under George Szell; formerly on Sony Essential Classics SBK47654, this appears to have been Ďpromotedí to the higher-price Great Performances label on 88697 00813 2. Some dealers are still listing the cheaper SBK version if you hurry. Single-CD versions of the Sixth are quite rare, with most conductors following Barbirolliís example in pacing the first movement very slowly, though Chandos even manage to squeeze a short filler, Todtenfeier, onto their Neeme Jšrvi recording (CHAN8956).
Szell actually gets through that first movement in under eighteen minutes, perhaps slightly stressing the allegro energico part of the direction at the expense of the ma non troppo which Mahler added, but I have always preferred that to slower versions of this movement. Judged by Szellís standards, therefore, Gergievís 21:59 is comparatively leisurely: itís closer to the tempo of most recent recordings and it now seems to me just about the right compromise for this movement. LSO Live already had a distinguished Mahler 6 in their catalogue, in the form of a 2002 performance conducted by Mariss Jansons; at 81:52 overall itís just too long to fit onto a single CD, but the first movement at 23:01 is not markedly slower than the new Gergiev.
Like LS, Iím pleased that Gergiev, unlike Szell, places the andante moderato second Ė Mahler may have changed his mind about this, but that seems the more logical arrangement to me.
If Gergiev can be accused of being insensitive, itís in the last movement, where, at 28:44, heís even a few seconds faster than Szell. Jansons takes 30:43 for this movement, which allows the music a little more time to breathe, whereas Gergiev presses on. One advantage of pressing on is to make the transitions less awkward Ė if he doesnít wholly succeed, that is at least partly Mahlerís fault Ė but it does mean that we seldom have a chance fully to take in the beauties of the scenery, as it were, and real beauties there are in this movement. Iím happy to sacrifice some of these for the energy which Gergiev finds here Ė after all, the closing section is marked allegro energico again, like the opening of the first movement. If this movement is Ďaboutí anything Ė and Iím mindful of the Klemperer quotation in JLís review, expressing agnosticism about the Ďmeaningí of the symphony Ė the hammer blows which fell the hero must have something to do with it, and these are very effectively delivered here. And, on second thoughts, there is both poetry and mystery about the opening of the Finale in this performance.
In another ĎSeen and Heardí review, Jim Pritchard writes of the Barbican performance of the Sixth as ďa reign of terrorĒ in which the audience were ďbeaten into submissionĒ. Perhaps that response was partly due to Gergievís physical presence, something which, of course, is absent from the CD; I really donít hear the recording like that.
Throughout the work the LSO give everything that Gergiev asks of them and the same is true of his version of the Seventh. Here my comparison was with a Vanguard recording with the Utah Symphony Orchestra under Maurice Abravanel.
Gergievís timings are not very different from Abravanelís: the difference between his 71:55 overall and Abravanelís 78:41 mirrors the timings of individual movements. The main difference is in the quality of the LSO playing: though Abravanel was a distinguished Mahler interpreter, the Utah orchestra is no match for the LSO at their best, as they are here.
Iíve seen the opening of Gergievís Seventh at the live concert described in pretty uncomplimentary terms, which surprised me as I listened to the finished product. Like Mehtaís reissued version of the First and Third Symphonies which I recently reviewed (Decca Eloquence 480 1133) Gergievís account of this movement seemed to me to tick all the right boxes in terms of Mahlerís markings. I suppose that the reason why there is so much disagreement about performances of Mahlerís symphonies is that there are so many apparently contradictory sides to his character Ė he gave Nietzscheís Nachtlied a prominent place in the Third Symphony, yet he told Alma to burn her copy of his works, for example Ė that no one performance can ever be ideal.
Stephen Johnsonís programme notes on the LSO web-page refute Schoenbergís view of this symphony as harmonious, arguing that the first two movements hark back to the tragic Sixth and that the Finale looks forward to the optimism of the Eighth. Within such a view of the work, the infelicities which some find in Gergievís performance become instead part of an interpretation which makes a great deal of sense. Add the further statement in those notes that the whole symphony is emotionally highly charged Ė again, certainly a defensible point of view Ė and Gergievís performance makes even more sense. If the performance as a whole leaves more questions asked than answered, so does the work itself.
JL concluded his review of the live performance of the Sixth with the prophetic words: "No doubt there will be plans to record and market the [Gergiev] cycle in its entirety. When this happens it will deserve to be regarded as a major recording event."
What he perhaps didnít foresee was the very mixed reception which the CDs would receive: the Sixth was Editorís Choice in one magazine and the Seventh is Recording of the Month in another, but there has also been much adverse comment from those who find that Gergiev misses the poetry and, therefore, the point of one or both of these works. I understand what the critics are missing, but I listened several times with considerable enjoyment to these performances of both symphonies. I may well make the Seventh my version of choice.
I shanít be getting rid of my Szell recording of the Sixth, but the Abravanel Seventh has passed its sell-by date by comparison with what Gergiev has to offer. I wouldnít say that either CD had yet become my benchmark in the same way that KubelŪkís First, Szellís Fourth and Bernsteinís DG Fifth certainly are Ė only time will tell. With a recording of a mainstream symphony, one can be pretty sure very quickly whether one likes the interpretation or not. Szellís version of the Fourth immediately had that effect on me when I first heard it long ago on CBS Classics, but Gergievís Sixth and Seventh are still to a certain extent in my pending tray. It took me nearly forty years to decide finally that I preferred Klempererís Mahler Second to Bruno Walterís and I havenít got another forty left.
Iíve been slightly dismissive of Barbirolliís Sixth, so let me make amends by recommending his version of the Ninth, another recording which struck me as right from the first time I heard it (EMI Great Recordings 5 67925 2). And, as much for Janet Bakerís contribution as Barbirolliís, Kindertotenlieder, Lieder eines fahrenden Gesellen and RŁckert Lieder on EMI GROC 5 66910 2.
Being impatient to hear these Gergiev performances and make up my own mind in the light of such a degree of disagreement, I downloaded both symphonies from eMusic. The Seventh is certainly more than acceptable Ė three movements at 192kbps, the last two at 224k Ė but I was less happy with their version of the Sixth, at bit-rates ranging from 176k to 256k. The Finale in particular makes severe demands on any recording medium and here I thought eMusicís mp3 download slightly too thin. LSO Live have cut the applause Ė a mistake I feel Ė and the ending sounds abrupt at eMusicís fairly low bit-rate. I usually find 192k perfectly adequate but here even 224k didnít seem quite up to it.
I also sampled the 320kbps version of the Sixth from Chandosís and was much happier with this version all round: Iíd still like a little more reverberation at the end, or, better still, the applause, as on the Szell recording, but the fuller 320k sound reduces the abruptness. The eMusic versions are incredibly inexpensive Ė four tracks for the Sixth works out at less than £1 and the Seventh comes out at £1.20 on the 50-tracks-per-month programme, but I think the Chandos version of the Sixth is very definitely worth the extra.
Downloading doesnít, of course, bring the booklet of notes but the programme notes for the LSO performances are available on their web-site. More seriously for SACD aficionados, of course, the downloads come in stereo only Ė and mp3 stereo at that, not lossless wma or flac. Whichever way you obtain these recordings is not going to cost a fortune, since the CDs are competitively priced. Mahlerians and budding Mahlerians should certainly give them a try.
Brian Wilson


We are currently offering in excess of 52,000 reviews

Advertising on

Donate and keep us afloat


New Releases

Naxos Classical

Nimbus Podcast

Obtain 10% discount

Special offer 50% off
15CDs £83 incl. postage

Musicweb sells the following labels

Altus 10% off
Atoll 10% off
CRD 10% off
Hallé 10% off
Lyrita 10% off
Nimbus 10% off
Nimbus Alliance
Prima voce 10% off
Red Priest 10% off
Retrospective 10% off
Saydisc 10% off
Sterling 10% off

Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing

Sample: See what you will get

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Seen & Heard
Editor Emeritus
   Bill Kenny
MusicWeb Webmaster
   David Barker
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger



Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews


      Composer surveys
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site


Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure



Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Pat and present

Helpers invited!

How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips

Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Other links
Web News sites etc

A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools

Return to Review Index

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.