Even a brief rummage through these pages will show you that there 
                are a fair few versions of these works available on CD. My main 
                comparison is the highly esteemed 1990 release performed by John 
                Holloway and Tragicomedia on Virgin Classics.
                
As a rule of thumb, 
                  Riccardo Minasi is more inclined to dig deeper in search of 
                  the dramatic in this music. Just taking the extremes of contrast 
                  in the opening Annunciation we get far more passionate 
                  extremes and a more brusquely narrative style than with Holloway, 
                  whose greater restraint is more concerned with the elegance 
                  and beauty in the music. This carries through to the accompaniment, 
                  which on the whole is a model of refined sonority with Tragicomedia, 
                  where Bizzarrie Armoniche keenly follow Minasi’s lead into more 
                  wilder realms. This may at first seem harder to live with, but 
                  the upshot is that, for instance, the emotional downturn with 
                  the minor keys of The Sorrowful Mysteries and the move 
                  towards the grand dramas of The Glorious Mysteries both 
                  have a more heightened character, a more deeply extended concave 
                  parabola in this new recording.
                
In an interview 
                  conducted with Riccardo Minasi by Nicoletta Sguben in the booklet, 
                  it soon becomes apparent that Minasi knows pretty much all there 
                  is to know about these pieces. He goes into the symbolism hidden 
                  in some of the numerology – the number of bars for instance, 
                  into that which might hide in the shifts in tuning, and in the 
                  hypothesis put forward by Davitt Moroney of the literal programmatic 
                  content of the music. I was interested to see that Minasi is 
                  in no way dogmatic about any of this; he just points out the 
                  possibilities in all of these things and indicates how they 
                  might provide added interpretative depths or alternatives. Dan 
                  Brown might have a field day with some of these aspects of The 
                  Mystery Sonatas, but my impression is that Riccardo Minasi 
                  is more determined to get the best out of the music on its own 
                  terms, being aware of the symbolism, but allowing others to 
                  sweat and strive for proofs of its meanings.
                
Heinrich Biber was 
                  a violin virtuoso who revelled in the effects he could obtain 
                  from his instrument. You only have to listen to something like 
                  his crazy Sonata Representativa to hear some of the results 
                  of this. Almost any composer’s ultimate goal is the representation 
                  of the deeply spiritual in music, and this certainly would have 
                  been the case in Biber’s time. For me there is no mystery in 
                  the Rosenkranz Sonaten other than the sense of awe when 
                  discovering anew the qualities in the music – both as individual 
                  movements, and as an all-embracing whole. Biber knew exactly 
                  what he was doing with the transition from the sheer intimacy 
                  of the final bars of Sonata V, ‘Jesus in the Temple, 
                  and the first of ‘The Sorrowful Mysteries’, Sonata VI, 
                  ‘The Agony in the Garden’, where the both composer and musicians 
                  make it easy to imagine a soulful figure torturing himself on 
                  the Mount of Olives.
                
I am full of admiration 
                  for Riccardo Minasi’s playing. He can be lyrical and tender 
                  as well as pulling no punches with the more dramatic, or what 
                  he sees as the more dramatic music. There may be times when 
                  you might feel that his approach errs on the side of relentlessness, 
                  but this is all part of the package – the violin treated as 
                  symphonic orchestra as well as soloist. A way of making some 
                  judgements on this is to zap straight on to the incredible Passacaglia 
                  for solo violin at the end. Minasi gives the piece every 
                  last drop of expressive contrast, measuring each variation with 
                  spacious majesty – dropping to pianississimo on occasion, 
                  and reviving triumphantly from the depths. I also like his way 
                  with ornamentation throughout this set. This is and should be 
                  very much an incidental aspect of the music, but with Minasi 
                  it carries its own emotional impact and weight rather than providing 
                  a vehicle for technical display – sometimes just a little extra 
                  emphasis on the vibrato, but conveying a rainbow of extra colours 
                  and meanings. John Holloway’s timing for this piece is as good 
                  as identical to Minasi’s, but he somehow seems to propel the 
                  music forward more swiftly, being more inclined to seek a more 
                  stable tempo in the line in the repeating bass pattern, Minasi 
                  flexes the time with a good deal of rubato while not losing 
                  the essential lines of the music. Holloway’s playing is truly 
                  excellent of course, but less laden with blood, sweat and tears 
                  than Minasi’s. Another recording of the Passacaglia I’ve 
                  greatly admired in the past is that of Andrew Manze on Harmonia 
                  Mundi (HMX 2907225) from 1994, but listening again it seems 
                  he’s if anything more laid back than Holloway, and certainly 
                  now seeming more than a little bland up against this new recording.
                
              
I have to bow to my 
                colleague Jonathan Woolf in terms of comparative 
                examples for Biber’s Rosenkranz Sonaten, but would 
                have to say that this new recording must be a strong contender 
                for anyone’s collection. Minasi and his colleagues make a strong 
                a case as I’ve heard for the narrative content in this music, 
                with plenty of genuine suffering, some psychological intrigue 
                if you want to look for it, and a great deal of sheer joy in the 
                playing. There may in fact be too much ‘going on’ for some people’s 
                tastes, but I enjoy this head-on approach, which can have the 
                horror aspect of a biblical scene by someone like Hieronymous 
                Bosch, as well as those more civilised gents such as Poussin and 
                Caravaggio. The recording is pretty stunning as well, with a good 
                balance between solo and accompaniment, and a very natural and 
                realistic sense of space in full SACD mode.
                
                Dominy Clements