Aureole etc.

Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line

Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Some items
to consider

new MWI
Current reviews

old MWI
pre-2023 reviews

paid for

Acte Prealable Polish recordings

Forgotten Recordings
Forgotten Recordings
All Forgotten Records Reviews

Troubadisc Weinberg- TROCD01450

All Troubadisc reviews

FOGHORN Classics

Brahms String Quartets

All Foghorn Reviews

All HDTT reviews

Songs to Harp from
the Old and New World

all Nimbus reviews

all tudor reviews

Follow us on Twitter

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Contributing Editor
Ralph Moore
   David Barker
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger



Johann Sebastian BACH (1685-1750)
Fugues from the “Well-Tempered Clavier”
(arr. Emanuel Aloys Förster (1748-1823) and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791), K. 405)*
Book I: Fuga I BWV 846; Fuga V BWV 850; Fuga XII BWV857; Fuga XIV BWV859; Fuga XVI BWV 861; Fuga XVII BWV 862; Fuga XVIII BWV863; Fuga XX BWV865; Fuga XXIII BWV 868; Fuga XXIV BWV 869
Book II: Fuga II BWV 876*; Fuga V BWV 874*; Fuga VII BWV 876*; Fuga VIII BWV877*; Fuga IX BWV 878*; Fuga XVI BWV 885; Fuga XVII BWV886; Fuga XXII BWV891; Fuga XXIII BWV 892; Fuga IV BWV 849; Fuga XXII BWV867
Emerson String Quartet (Da-Hong Seetoo (violin II) in 5-voiced fugues)
rec. New York, American Academy of Arts and Letters, December 2007
DEUTSCHE GRAMMOPHON 4777458 [57:17] 

Experience Classicsonline

Eugene Drucker in his short comment ‘The Emersons on playing Bach Fugues’ in the booklet for this release, states that, “Bach’s ideas in these fugues are so pure that they transcend the characteristics of the instrument for which he wrote them.” This is arguable, but is likely to become the essential point on which many listeners’ appreciation of this recording will hinge. Whether you are a fan of the harpsichord or prefer this music played on a modern piano, you will inevitably associate its textures, voicing and expressive balance and weight with an instrument whose note is one of attack and decay, and also one entirely without vibrato; that is unless the occasional bebung of a clavichord is a familiar sound, though one unlikely to be encountered often in music of this complexity.

In other words, having these works played by string instruments fundamentally alters its character. If you are familiar with this music on whatever keyboard you will have to adjust and become used to hearing much loved counterpoint in a new setting, and either accept it as chamber music in its own right, or wonder why anyone bothered when the original was perfectly wonderful in the first place. There is an academic argument as to whether Bach’s fugues for another sustaining instrument, the organ, differ sufficiently from those of the Well Tempered Clavier to make that character of the music “transcend the characteristics of the instrument for which he wrote them”. I’m not going to enter into this debate, beyond indicating it as just one reason for imagining that recordings such as this will polarise opinion. Divorcing these fugues from the technically problematic preludes does tend to emphasise this aspect of such a programme, although the playing on this recording takes this set of fugues far beyond becoming a purely academic exercise. With the Emerson Quartet’s previous Bach outing with their best-selling The Art of Fugue this will have been less of a source of controversy. Bach’s score for this work doesn’t indicate specific instrumentation, and the music has been arranged for just about any instrumental combination you can imagine, although there are some who will always argue that the tradition is ever-present for performance at the keyboard.

Another reason why opinion may be divided on this recording is the style of performance. The Emerson Quartet makes no concessions to current early music performance practice trends, and their romantically expressive, vibrato-laden sound may sound unbearably old-fashioned to some ears. To a certain extent it reminded me of those old Ars Rediviva recordings which, despite a certain sentimental attachment, now fail to grab me in the same way as more recent Bach interpretations by artists like Reinhard Goebel. The Emerson Quartet is not a early music ensemble, and neither are these arrangements from that period. Listening to these performances there is an argument to be had as to whether, having chosen not to enter the realms of early-music performance practice, there is a case for demanding an even more adventurous trip down this alternative road. Again, I am not criticising for this decision in what is after all a set of arrangements with little enough performing tradition, let alone having any place in that of being ‘historically informed’. My concern is that the contrast between fugues is placed within too narrow a framework. If we’re going romantic, or even modern, then let’s see how far we can go – stretching lines, digging deeper, to place these works in those realms which were freed by the strangeness of Beethoven’s Grosse Fuge. Having played the disc through a number of times there always seems a point at which my brain switches off, and I only start noticing the music properly when it has stopped. This is not because the music or the performances are intrinsically dull, just that, like a sentence with too many words such as this, everything just somehow ends up sounding pretty much the same after a certain amount of time, so that you stop paying attention to what is being ....

Whatever the arguments and complaints, there is a most certain validity to recording arrangements of this nature, especially when signed off by names like Mozart. Mozart immersed himself in the fugues of ‘the 48’ in 1782, applying himself to the manuscripts in Baron von Swieten’s Viennese collection in the spring of that year, and subsequently using the experience to enrich his own work. On its own terms this is a very nice string quartet/quintet recording, placed in the rich acoustic of the American Academy of Arts and Letters, and to my mind given the correct balance between presence and detail on the one hand, atmosphere on the other. The ‘slower’ fugues seem to work the best in this setting, with the undulating richness of BWV 859 and BWV 869 creating their own subtle beauty. The articulation of the livelier fugues is also approached with its own accurate intensity, but as textures thicken the Emersons are hoisted somewhat by their own collective petard. The stated intention is “that separate instruments can make it easier for listeners to hear the various voices”, but is followed by “Since we all play the same thematic material, we’ve had to try harder than ever to achieve similarity or unanimity of style and approach.” Of course there needs to be unity and consistency, but clarity surely comes through a greater hierarchy of voices – those which lead, and those which are of lesser importance at any given moment. Listen to something like BWV 877 and yes, you will hear each player entering with the principal subject with greater emphasis, but the busy goings-on elsewhere don’t really enhance the clarity. Also the more familiar rhythmic bounce of the music is more clogged with those longer notes, which in stringed instruments refuse to decay and ‘get out of the way’. My point is more importantly that, with each voice having the same or similar character, it is bringing us back to that common denominator of lack of real contrast. Nice stereo separation of the individual players is no substitute for this. One of my all-time desert-island sets is Sviatoslav Richter playing the entire Das Wolhtemperierte Klavier, and, taking another fairly random dip with his BWV 878 one can hear each entry of the main subject as a kind of prayer – sung each time by a different person. While not wanting to be unkind, the Emerson players sound more like one of those mirror portraits, four identical people saying as near enough the same thing as makes little difference one from the other.

I could go on for pages, but in the end you will have to make up your own mind, and if you have the opportunity to have a listen before purchasing I would strongly urge you so to do. In summing up, this is a gorgeous sounding, beautifully performed and recorded disc, and I wish I could muster more enthusiasm. I’m in no way against Bach being played on whatever instrument makes him sound good, so please don’t come away with the impression that I’m stuck with my preconceptions of some ideal of piano or harpsichord sound exclusively for this repertoire. The Emerson Quartet’s Art of Fugue sold hugely, so no doubt Deutsche Grammophon had incentive enough to see a follow-up release, and I wish all concerned the best of luck. Damon Runyon would just say it’s ‘easy on the ears’ and leave it at that, no further intellectual posturing required. Time will tell if this becomes a best-seller, but for me it will always be more of a supplement than a staple of my Bach diet.

Dominy Clements 



Advertising on

Donate and keep us afloat


New Releases

Naxos Classical
All Naxos reviews

Chandos recordings
All Chandos reviews

Hyperion recordings
All Hyperion reviews

Foghorn recordings
All Foghorn reviews

Troubadisc recordings
All Troubadisc reviews

all cpo reviews

Divine Art recordings
Click to see New Releases
Get 10% off using code musicweb10
All Divine Art reviews

All APR reviews

Lyrita recordings
All Lyrita Reviews


Wyastone New Releases
Obtain 10% discount




Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews


      Composer surveys
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site


Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure



Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Pat and present

Helpers invited!

How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips

Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Other links
Web News sites etc

A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools

Return to Review Index

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.