From Tahra’s ever-industrious studios comes the latest entrant 
                in its Westminster Archives series. It conjoins the series’s hero, 
                Hermann Scherchen, with that admirable pianist Edith Farnadi. 
              
The result is 
                    a quintet of concerto performances recorded in Vienna between 
                    1952 and 1953. The two Liszt concertos are the openers and 
                    they prove her worth in this repertoire. Back in LP days HMV 
                    picked up on her Nixa recital of the Légendes as well as the 
                    Ballades in D flat major 
                    and B minor. and their perspicacity was warranted. She was 
                    assuredly a notable Liszt proponent and it’s good to see that 
                    these performances, as well as others including the Hungarian 
                    Rhapsodies, the Totentanz and Hungarian Fantasy are now available 
                    on the Naxos Classical Archives.  They were all made contemporaneously 
                    with these Vienna sessions – an especially high and visible 
                    point in her discography. 
                  
The 
                    concertos display all the virtues of mettle and drama that 
                    one could have inferred from those other performances. There 
                    is considerable excitement and despite the period sound what 
                    emerges is a fine equipoise between dramatic self assertion 
                    and poetic lyricism. The Hungarian-born soloist understands 
                    the natural crests of the rhythmic profile and performs with 
                    panache and a certain coiled tensile quality throughout. 
                  
She 
                    also plays two Bartók concertos. She’d studied with Arnold 
                    Székely who had studied alongside Bartók at the Budapest Academy 
                    so her lineage was taut.  Not only was she busy in the studios 
                    recording Liszt but at around the time of these Bartók sessions 
                    she set down Mikrokosmos on the WWN label as well as 
                    the Allegro barbaro, so it can be seen that was extensively 
                    admired in the repertoire. Of the two concerto performances 
                    the Third is, to me, the more successful. There is plenty 
                    of fine playing in the Second and the collaboration with Scherchen 
                    was auspicious. The orchestra comes under pressure from time 
                    to time but acquits itself well. What limits complete admiration 
                    is a feeling that things are held in reserve. The performance 
                    of the Third might surprise by virtue of an amount of metrical 
                    freedom allowed to the soloist but it works within the general 
                    structural and expressive parameters of the music. Farnadi 
                    proves a resilient and tonally flexible proponent and Scherchen, 
                    alert to the lexicon of contemporary writing, no less so. 
                    The uneasy sense of concertante reserve that haunts part of 
                    the Second does not emerge in this vigorously engaging recording 
                    of the Third. 
                  
The 
                    Rachmaninoff performance was apparently not that well received 
                    at the time by critics. The piano is rather forward in an 
                    accepted manner and the strings don’t sing out in their opening 
                    paragraphs. The opening is reserved. But what you will hear, 
                    for this date, is a great deal of digital detail. There’s 
                    stoic nobility to the collaboration between Farnadi and Scherchen, 
                    an avoidance of obvious Romantic gestures and effusiveness 
                    that will intrigue. The string tone remains thin however, 
                    which is a pity. And it’s certainly not a performance for 
                    every day. 
                  
These 
                    restorations are worthily returned to the catalogue. They 
                    document a valuable association between conductor and soloist 
                    in well managed transfers. 
                  
Jonathan Woolf