One of the most grown-up review sites around

54,416 reviews
and more.. and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here



International mailing

Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

Some items
to consider

new MWI
Current reviews

old MWI
pre-2023 reviews

paid for

Acte Prealable Polish recordings

Forgotten Recordings
Forgotten Recordings
All Forgotten Records Reviews

Troubadisc Weinberg- TROCD01450

All Troubadisc reviews

FOGHORN Classics

Brahms String Quartets

All Foghorn Reviews

All HDTT reviews

Songs to Harp from
the Old and New World

all Nimbus reviews

all tudor reviews

Follow us on Twitter

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Contributing Editor
Ralph Moore
   David Barker
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger


Advertising on

Donate and keep us afloat


New Releases

Naxos Classical
All Naxos reviews

Chandos recordings
All Chandos reviews

Hyperion recordings
All Hyperion reviews

Foghorn recordings
All Foghorn reviews

Troubadisc recordings
All Troubadisc reviews

all cpo reviews

Divine Art recordings
Click to see New Releases
Get 10% off using code musicweb10
All Divine Art reviews

All APR reviews

Lyrita recordings
All Lyrita Reviews


Wyastone New Releases
Obtain 10% discount




CD: Orchestral Concerts

Dmitri SHOSTAKOVICH (1906-1975)
Symphony No.10 in E minor Op.93 (1953) [47:23]
Prague Symphony Orchestra/Václav Smetáček
rec. 6 March 1968, Royal Festival Hall, London

Experience Classicsonline

This disc preserves a London performance of one of Shostakovich’s greatest symphonies by the Prague Symphony Orchestra and Václav Smetáček. It’s a performance that has a good deal to commend it. However, some six months later London heard an altogether extraordinary performance of the same work and, unfortunately so far as this recording is concerned, that too has made it onto CD. I refer to the performance given at the Proms on 21 August by the USSR State Symphony Orchestra and Evgeny Svetlanov. In his review of that disc Dan Morgan rightly draws attention to its historic significance: the concert took place on the very night that Soviet tanks rolled into Czechoslovakia, sparking vociferous protests in the Royal Albert Hall from some of the audience. That must have created a frisson and Svetlanov and his players went on to give an incandescent reading of the Tenth symphony. However, I should say that I remember the Melodiya LP from the same forces; that studio recording was pretty visceral too.
I don’t think, however, that it was just the sense of occasion that made the Svetlanov performance so much more intense than this Smetáček reading. What really differentiates the two - and so disappoints me in the Smetáček performance - is the first movement. The Czech conductor has a very different view of Shostakovich’s Moderato marking and to my mind the fairly flowing pace that he sets is too fast. It’s the main reason why he takes 20:25 against Svetlanov’s 22:44. Indeed, at this speed the first four notes we hear sound brusque rather than ominous. Smetáček doesn’t have the brooding introspection of Svetlanov and later on he can’t bring the same menacing power. Furthermore, I don’t sense the willingness to engage in slight, subtle tempo modifications that other conductors have done in my experience; it’s a bit unyielding. Just out of interest I looked out the very fine 1955 DG studio performance by Karel Ančerl and the Czech Philharmonic. Ančerl’s timing is almost identical to Smetáček’s - he takes 20:48 - and his basic speed isn’t very different but you sense much more probing with Ančerl and there’s more give and take in the pulse. It helps also, I’m sure that while Smetáček is at the helm of a good orchestra Ančerl has a great one at his disposal. So, within a similar time frame Ančerl delivers a more searching reading of this huge first movement and while the movement is dismissed in a mere sentence in the booklet note - which is no more than serviceable - it is, in fact, one of Shostakovich’s deepest symphonic movements so the way it’s delivered matters hugely in assessing a performance of the work as a whole. Sad to relate, I think Smetáček sounds superficial when compared with either his distinguished compatriot, Ančerl, or with Svetlanov.
To be fair to Smetáček the other three movements fare much better. The acerbic scherzo has the necessary punch and bite; it’s probably the age of the recording that blunts the weight of those powerful string chords at the start. The third movement is done well. There’s a distinct East European timbre to the first horn’s tone, which I like - and the player is good. Smetáček and his players unfold the andante introduction to the finale eloquently and then despatch the allegro with good vigour. The performance is greeted with vociferous applause by an audience which, hitherto, had been commendably unobtrusive.
The sound of this recording is not at all bad for 1968 though I think there’s more depth and body to the BBC recording of the Svetlanov performance. This disc offers rather short measure at just over 47 minutes of playing time.

This is a decent account of Shostakovich’s masterpiece but the great is the enemy of the good and I feel duty bound to say that if you want a live recording then Svetlanov offers a significantly more compelling experience.
John Quinn

see also review by Jonathan Woolf
Masterwork Index: Shostakovich Symphony 10



























































































































See also review by Jonathan Woolf



Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews


      Composer surveys
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site


Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure



Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Pat and present

Helpers invited!

How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips

Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Other links
Web News sites etc

A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.