Aureole etc.




Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line




Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Some items
to consider

 


New App by the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra for iOS and Android!


BAX Orchestral pieces


CASKEN Violin Concerto

Schumann Symphonies Rattle


Complete Brahms
Bargain price

 

REVIEW



Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical

Hyperion

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
Alto
Arcodiva
Atoll
CDAccord
Cameo Classics
Centaur
Hallé
Hortus
Lyrita
Nimbus
Northern Flowers
Redcliffe
Sheva
Talent
Toccata Classics


Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing
sample
 

 

alternatively
CD: MDT AmazonUK AmazonUS

Robert SCHUMANN (1810-1856)
Piano Quartet in E flat, Op.47 (1842) [27:10]
Liederkreis, Op.24 (1840) [21:39]
Fantasiestücke, Op.88 (1842) [19:35]
London Bridge Ensemble (Ivan Ludlow (baritone), Benjamin Nabarro (violin), Tom Dunn (viola), Kate Gould (viola), Daniel Tong (piano))
rec. Sept. 2009, Wye Valley Festival, Monmouth. DDD.
texts in German with English translations
SONIMAGE SON11001 [68:24]

Experience Classicsonline



This disc presents an all-Schumann program. Defying expectations about single-ensemble albums, it contains both chamber music and songs. The London Bridge Ensemble is one of the most interesting groups appearing in Britain recently. Their Frank Bridge Dutton CDs met with critical acclaim.

Schumann’s Piano Quartet is the younger brother to his Piano Quintet. It is the warmer and more personal of the two. Both were written in a surge of inspiration during Schumann’s “Chamber Music Year”. The first movement of the Quartet is very Romantic, with grand gestures and powerful climaxes. The performance is appropriately extrovert and ebullient. The Scherzo is weightless and dainty, and is played with good vigor. The Andante cantabile is probably the greatest love song ever written by Schumann for his beloved Clara. The structure is simple: the glorious melody is introduced by the cello and passed to other strings, to be repeated over and over again in slightly different shades. This is not the untamed flame, but the calm evening fire that warms, but does not burn. The finale is energetic and carefree, a bit rustic, and the ending is nothing short of grandiose. This movement is one of Schumann’s experiments with structure. In the hands of these performers it all works perfectly.

The members of the ensemble play with excellent flair, consistent and vivid. The strings are pliant and expressive, the piano is fluid; intensively rapturous. One quibble: in the slow movement, when the piano has its syncopated episode, it is insecure, so what is supposed to sound like palpitations sounds like discord. This is a live recording, which is probably the cause of the acoustics not being sufficiently transparent. This especially affects the low strings, which play such a big role. Don’t get me wrong: the acoustics are quite acceptable, but the result sounds a tad heavy.

In case you were wondering, Schumann’s Liederkreis Op.39 is not a later and better setting of the same poems as Liederkreis Op.24. “Liederkreis” means “song cycle” in German. Op.24 sets nine poems by Heinrich Heine, while Op.39 uses twelve poems by Joseph Eichendorff.

The Romantic sentiments are intended to be exaggerated. Heine already dramatized, when he packed so many different emotions so densely. Schumann inflated the drama yet more. His music always reflected his personality, and both sides of it – the impatient Florestan and the introvert Eusebius – are shown in turn. If the result is more art than life, then this is an intrinsic feature of the Romantic Movement. While Lieder from Schubert’s cycles can be performed separately, Liederkreis was envisioned as a cycle, and some of the songs would become hapless chunks if taken out of the sequence. Ivan Ludlow’s baritone is tenor-like, smooth, a touch oily, with good control of vibrato. It has power, and the long notes are round and beautiful. Quite fittingly for Schumann, Ludlow wears his heart on his sleeve and gives these larger-than-life songs a larger-than-life reading – not an intimate one. He often sings with operatic force. The pianist supports him in the same idiom and style. The balance of the singer and the instrument is well chosen, so the little beauties of the piano part are well heard, and it really becomes a duet. But there are some hard and rigid places. The acoustics create a faithful recital atmosphere, though the loudest moments do not come out ideally. The lasting impression is of one big cake with whipped cream and colorful icing.

Dvorák called and numbered his Dumky as a piano trio. Fantasiestücke Op.88, born the same year as the Quartet, are not officially counted among Schumann’s piano trios, although they are closer to the classical norms than Dumky. Still, this work does not sound as a unified whole, and never will. It is a set of pictures, and one shouldn’t seek unity where the composer did not intend it. Also, it has some structural stumble-points that can lead to weak and unconvincing readings. The London Bridge Ensemble gives an excellent presentation, loaded with inspiration. They play the Romanze as the slow introduction to the first movement proper, the Humoreske. The emotions are reserved, and there is a feeling of tales in the evening dusk. Humoreske is done slower than usual, which allows us to hear and appreciate all the inner lines which can otherwise be lost in more vigorous interpretations. The interest of this music lies in the contrast between the rustic refrain and the high Romantic episodes. Duett resembles the slow movement of the Quartet, though the tone is colder and more plaintive here. The melody of this heartfelt love dialog is exchanged between the cello and the violin, with piano providing the murmuring ripples. I’ve heard several recordings of this work, but was never convinced by the finale. The London Bridge Ensemble proved to me that my problem was not with the music but with the interpretations. Maybe they take it a bit faster, more lively than usual, maybe it’s just the right pulse and breathing, but everything suddenly fits into place. Like the Humoreske, this is a quasi-rondo, with a plucky march-like refrain and a few more relaxed episodes. Schumann creates massive, thick sonorities, but here they do not sound coarse. Instead, there is a nice bagpipe hum. I could only have wished that the “aftermath” coda had been more soft and glowing.

These interpretations are very consistent and will appeal to those who like their Schumann hot and juicy. I admired the skill with which the musicians brought to life the big structures, especially the two finales which communicate a rare unity and compactness. The insert-note by Daniel Tong, the pianist of the ensemble, contains a well-written musical analysis. The acoustics could be bettered, but what we get instead is the electricity of the live recording. I enjoyed listening, though in the future will probably return to less heated readings.

Oleg Ledeniov

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


EXPLORE MUSICWEB INTERNATIONAL

Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews

 

Discographies
   Composer
      Composer surveys
   National
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
.
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

Interviews
With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site

Nostalgia

Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Comment
Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure

Announcements

 

Community
Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Reviewers
Pat and present

Helpers invited!

Resources
How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips


Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Publishers
Other links
Newsgroups
Web News sites etc

PotPourri
A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Questionnaire    
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Dictionary
Magazines
Newsfeed  
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools






Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.