| 
         
          |  |  |   
          |     
 alternativelyCD: 
MDT
AmazonUK
AmazonUS
 
 | Rhapsodies for Two PianosFlorent SCHMITT (1870-1958)
 Three Rhapsodies (Française; Polonaise; Viennoise), Op.53 (1903-04) [21:06]
 Alexander ARUTYUNIAN (b.1920) and
 Arno BABADJANIAN (1921-1983)
 Armenian Rhapsody (1950) [5:57]
 Sergei RACHMANINOV (1873-1943)
 Russian Rhapsody (1891) [9:45]
 George GERSHWIN (1898-1937)
 Rhapsody in Blue (1924) [17:21]
 Franz (Ferenc) LISZT (1811-1886)
 Hungarian Rhapsody No.2 (arr. Kleinmichel, cadenza by Yuval Admony) (1851) [10:28]
 
  Tami Kanazawa, Yuval Admony (piano) rec. 2001(Schmitt)-2003, Rolston Recital Hall, Banff Centre for the Arts, Canada
 
  ROMÉO RECORDS 7276   [64:37]   |   
          |  |   
          |  
               
                
 There is some excellent playing here, but it took me some time 
                  to warm to this disc. This was mostly due to the music that 
                  opens the program, and takes about one third of its length: 
                  three Rhapsodies by Florent Schmitt. Schmitt’s music 
                  has experienced somewhat of a revival in the last few years, 
                  and his name has started appearing in release lists. I happen 
                  to know some of his music, and much of it is good. The composer 
                  seems to have fallen in the pit between the pillars of Debussy 
                  and Les Six, but if judged solely on the evidence of the three 
                  works presented here, I’d say he had better stay forgotten in 
                  this pit.
 
 The three Rhapsodies are subtitled Française, Polonaise 
                  and Viennoise, but they have neither enough diversity 
                  nor national character to earn these labels. More or less, these 
                  are three bourgeois Waltzes, with some salon melancholy and 
                  salon comfort, and a lot of circus pomp and bravura. Don’t follow 
                  the square tunes: there is little to follow there. If you want 
                  to spend your time better, listen to the music that surrounds 
                  the tune: some of the accompanying touches are quite intricate 
                  and stimulating. There are episodes with soft, caressing harmonies, 
                  and with glittering quicksilver runs; there are overblown Romantic 
                  climaxes and hushed, elegiac moments. However the main musical 
                  content is plain, and the melodies usually just rise up – and 
                  go down, up – and down. Schmitt certainly gave a lot of work 
                  to the pianists, and I am sure this can be great music to watch 
                  – especially when performed with such poise and assurance.
 
 Armenian folk music is very melodic, and some of its characteristic 
                  twists and turns can be already familiar to you from Khachaturian’s 
                  works. Two of his younger compatriots – Arutyunian and Babadjanian 
                  – collaborated on the Armenian Rhapsody. The beginning 
                  is slower and darker – like a ballad. The music goes higher 
                  and louder, and the tension grows. After a short climax the 
                  music calms down, and we move into the brisk and lively second 
                  part. It brings to mind the main theme of the first movement 
                  of Khachaturian’s violin concerto – with the same lightness 
                  and fervor, insistent rhythmic pressure, and a similar nervous 
                  “saw-teeth” melody. The music is memorable and, compared to 
                  other works on this disc, seems too short. It comes, it rolls 
                  past you – and is gone, like a swift dance.
 
 The Russian Rhapsody of Rachmaninov was written when 
                  the composer was just 18. It is essentially a set of variations 
                  of increasing density. The theme is very Russian, and it seems 
                  as if we have already heard it in some of Tchaikovsky’s music. 
                  It is simple, but does not sound square, and provides a rich 
                  base for variations. The strong influence of Tchaikovsky is 
                  clearly felt, but there already is a lot of Rachmaninov’s forming 
                  self, with its characteristic chanting and shimmer. The slow 
                  variation is very beautiful. Kanazawa and Admony give an excellent 
                  performance, worthy of the Russian piano school. Different performers 
                  usually emphasize different traits in this music: Kanazawa and 
                  Admony highlight its sunny, playful side.
 
 Can one still enjoy Gershwin’s Rhapsody In Blue without 
                  Grofé’s sparkling orchestration? Surprisingly, yes: the main 
                  meat of this music, Gershwin’s rhythmic and melodic invention, 
                  is still there. The composer said about this composition: “I 
                  heard it as a sort of musical kaleidoscope of America, of our 
                  vast melting pot, of our unduplicated national pep, of our metropolitan 
                  madness”. It’s all present in the two-piano arrangement – though 
                  it is hard to be without the famous opening clarinet glissando, 
                  or without all the wild orchestral tutti that we have 
                  become accustomed to. The playing is brilliant, though at the 
                  same time it seems a bit over-cautious. Maybe a more unbuttoned 
                  performance would better suit this brave new music. The “love 
                  theme” is wide and expressive, but outside it there is much 
                  hard staccato. Still, I was left with an overwhelming 
                  cinematographic feeling, just as after a good performance of 
                  the orchestral version. It’s the longest work on the disk, but 
                  it just flies by effortlessly.
 
 The pianists show excellent synchronization in Liszt’s famous 
                  Hungarian Rhapsody No.2. In its ever-changing tempos 
                  they navigate as one living organism. The performance has all 
                  the necessary bravura and is technically very impressive. It 
                  is grand and childish exactly where needed. The cimbalom effects 
                  are well done. Again, it sounds too staccato to my taste, 
                  as if the pianists played it with mallets, not fingers. Also, 
                  here, as in other works, they are a little let down by the rather 
                  shallow and uninteresting piano sound.
 
 I do not know who wrote the liner-note, but it is informative 
                  and engaging. It mostly speaks about the works present on the 
                  disk, on a rather accessible level. The recording quality is 
                  good and clear, but lacks some depth. As a whole, this is an 
                  interesting collection – though at some point I started skipping 
                  over the Schmitt pieces; I just can’t take the whole 20 minutes 
                  of golden oompah. The performance tends to be percussive, which 
                  is good for some works, less so for others.
 Oleg Ledeniov      |  |