This disc promises new interpretations of familiar classics, 
                  but innovations are thin on the ground. The do.gma chamber orchestra 
                  is made up of young musicians and is led by the equally youthful 
                  Mikhail Gurewitsch. They are a competent group and the technical 
                  side of their playing isn't bad at all, but despite their claims 
                  to the contrary, they have nothing radical to say about this 
                  music, making for pleasurable but predictable results. 
                  
                  For most conductors, Tchaikovsky's Serenade for Strings is an 
                  excuse to show off the dramatic power of their orchestra's string 
                  section, a whirlwind ride through every shade of emotion you 
                  might find in a Tchaikovsky symphony, only without wind or percussion. 
                  Gurewitsch, in contrast, seems to take the generic title at 
                  face value, and directs a performance that is more in the spirit 
                  of Mozart or Haydn. There is no grandeur in the first movement 
                  (which is unusually fast), little passion in the Valse or Elegia, 
                  and the Finale, while it is admittedly longer than its material 
                  justifies, feels longer still for the rigid performance it gets 
                  here. 
                  
                  Souvenir de Florence comes off better. There is a bit more drama 
                  here, and a bit more expressive rubato too. The work is better 
                  known in the original version for string sextet, so performing 
                  the version for string orchestra gives the players a natural 
                  advantage in terms of symphonic power, and for the most part 
                  they make the most of it. Like the Serenade, and indeed many 
                  of Tchaikovsky's works, the Souvenir poses a challenge to performers 
                  in the dichotomy between the Romantic passion of the music and 
                  the Classical structuring of the individual movements. For the 
                  most part, they veer towards the Romantic in the Souvenir, which 
                  makes for a greater sense of engagement from the listener's 
                  perspective. 
                  
                  The audio is good, but by SACD standards it is not exceptional. 
                  The individual lines all come through OK but the orchestra always 
                  feels a bit homogenised. Some moments of shaky intonation don't 
                  help either, although they are mostly isolated to brief exposed 
                  episodes. The array is interesting, in that the first and second 
                  violins are placed on opposite sides, emphasising the stereo 
                  effect at the top of the ensemble, while distributing the bass 
                  more evenly. Every time I hear one of these MDG 2+2+2 discs, 
                  I wonder what the six channel mix sounds like, and I'll confess 
                  to not having the technology to find out myself. Perhaps greater 
                  efforts have been made there to draw the listener into the mix 
                  than have for the stereo mix. 
                  
                  Perhaps the problem with this disc is the coupling. Despite 
                  the fact that Tchaikovsky himself wrote or arranged both works 
                  for string orchestra, and that they are of similar length, the 
                  fact remains that the former is very much a symphonic work while 
                  the latter fits squarely into the chamber repertoire. The two 
                  works can retain their respective symphonic and chamber identities, 
                  however many players are involved in a performance, provided 
                  the right stylistic approach is taken. This recording tries 
                  to bring the works together somewhere between the symphonic 
                  and chamber music worlds. That might provide continuity across 
                  the programme, but does both works a disservice.   
                
                Gavin Dixon