Aureole etc.




Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line




Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Some items
to consider

 


Enjoy the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra wherever you are. App available for iOS and Android


Mahler symphony 6 Nott


Vaughan Williams Symphony 3 etc.


Lyrita New Recording


Lyrita Premiere Recordings

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage


Decca Phase 4 - 40CDs


Judith Bailey, George Lloyd


BAX Orchestral pieces


CASKEN Violin Concerto

Schumann Symphonies Rattle


Complete Brahms
Bargain price

 

 

 

 

REVIEW



Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical

Hyperion

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
Alto
Arcodiva
Atoll
CDAccord
Cameo Classics
Centaur
Hallé
Hortus
Lyrita
Nimbus
Northern Flowers
Redcliffe
Sheva
Talent
Toccata Classics


Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing
sample
 

alternatively
MDT

Joseph HAYDN (1732-1809)
Symphony no.98 in B flat major Hob.I:98 [25:12]
Anton BRUCKNER (1824-1896)
Symphony no.7 in E major [52:03]
Boston Symphony Orchestra/Charles Munch
rec. Sanders Theatre, Harvard University, 18 October 1960 (Haydn), 18 February 1958 (Bruckner)
Bonus: Spoken introductions by William Pierce [5:14]
ICA CLASSICS ICAD5028 [82:32]

Experience Classicsonline


This looks like the beginning of a fascinating and important series. As the notes tell us, the television station WGBH of Boston televised more than one hundred and fifty live concerts by the Boston Symphony Orchestra between 1955 and 1979. More than a hundred of these performances still survive but, until recently, legal problems had relegated them to a close-kept secret. Now the lid is off, and the prospects are mouth-watering. 1955 was approximately the midway-point of Munch’s reign. Also covered were Leinsdorf’s substantial tenure, Steinberg’s briefer period and the early Ozawa years. Plus a number of guest conductors.
 
As to quality, the picture in the Haydn is about what you would expect from the period. The Bruckner has evidently deteriorated - ICA apologise for the defects - with wonky horizontal lines that tire the eyes. Still, there are some good views of Munch in full spate. The sound is cruder than one would expect from contemporary LPs, a bit hard and glassy. However, the typical RCA LPs of the day rarely gave the Boston SO the credit for playing quietly. Here some real soft playing is captured, notably in the second movement of the Haydn, which is most delicately shaped. All things considered, on this showing the films have emerged from the storeroom in better shape than one might have feared. It was a splendid idea, too, to have the booklet introductions - at least in the present case - written by Richard Dyer, long-serving critic of the Boston Globe. The original spoken introductions by William Pierce are included, but as a bonus at the end.
 
When I have heard all hundred-odd of these surviving films - if this should ever happen - I shall be able to state definitely whether the present Bruckner 7th was the worst possible place to start. As of now, I can only say that this seems awfully likely. But let’s take things in order.
 
On the face of it, it was a splendid catch to find Munch conducting two pieces he never set down in the studio. His sole Haydn recordings in the studio with the BSO, Dyer reminds us, were of symphonies 103 and 104. A live 102 from a Russian tour was issued on a Melodiya LP. Back in pre-war France, one of Munch’s earliest records (1938) was of Haydn’s Sinfonia Concertante with an anonymous orchestra and a group of soloists notable for the presence of André Navarra as cellist.
 
I seem to have seen fragments of Munch conducting favourite French repertoire in a rather flamboyant style. Here, in less than everyday repertoire, he beats time in a very clear-cut, vigorous, businesslike manner. As the allegros get going his long baton is inclined to set up a sort of vibrato which no doubt stimulated orchestral excitement and doesn’t seem to have affected precision. He cuts a commanding figure, exuding firm authority. There’s a purposeful, Beethovenian drive to the first movement, but with a typical Munch zest that prevents it from getting thick or heavy. The second movement has much tenderness and grace, the Minuet has a fine lilt and the finale makes much of the sudden incursions of a solo violin in a slower tempo. However, the one drawback is here.
 
For the last of the solo violin interventions, Haydn provided an elaborate, rather cranky harpsichord part. Some have wondered if this is a hint that similarly elaborate harpsichord continuos should be improvised all through the late symphonies. But, so far as I know, no one has actually tried it. A performance I heard in Edinburgh under Alexander Gibson in the 70s took the score at face value and treated it as one of the best Haydn jokes of all. Quite frankly, the shock effect of the harpsichord suddenly twanging away like nobody’s business after it had been silent up till then was hilarious. The 1960 television audience were primed, too, by the presenter who mentioned the eleven bars for harpsichord, adding that Haydn wrote them to play himself. Munch’s joke is that he hasn’t got a harpsichord … Rather like doing the “Drum-roll” symphony without a drum… Poor man, could he not find in all Boston, nay in all New England, a harpsichord in sufficient working order to manage those eleven bars? Still, there’s much more to cherish than to regret.
 
The idea of Munch and Bruckner sounds like a contradiction in terms. The warm-hearted phrasing of the opening themes of the first two movements spell reassurance. The tempi are fastish but the idea that Bruckner should go as slowly as possibly does not derive from the scores in any case. The tempi for these two movements are in themselves perfectly plausible.
 
Disconcertion arrives when Munch starts whipping them up. Very exciting, no doubt, but, working on the principle that what goes up must come down, if you crank up the tempo, then sooner or later you have to grind to a halt. And stop-go Bruckner is fatal. Alas, the poor composer is made to sound a fumbling amateur with an occasional gift for melody.
 
To tell the truth, there were plenty of people back in 1958, maybe including Munch himself, who did think just that. I remember reading in a book by a respected author, it may have been Hadow, a blow-by-blow comparison between the first movements of Brahms 4 and Bruckner 7. The idea being that the Brahms was a shining example of how to write a symphonic movement. Bruckner, on the other hand, was held up as a laughing-stock, a blundering ignoramus, the perfect example of how not to write a symphony. Hadow, if it was he, would have been writing in the 1930s or earlier. But plenty would have still agreed with him in 1958. Even in the early 70s, after a performance of Bruckner 7 in Edinburgh - briskly but cogently interpreted by Gibson - one of our University lecturers, a notable harpsichordist and a fine Bach scholar, was heard ruminating to the ceiling and to anybody else within earshot: “beautiful chord, E major …. I could listen to it all evening …. You bloody well have to when it’s Bruckner 7 …”. However, it was a little unusual even in 1958 for someone who apparently felt that way about Bruckner to conduct one of his works and one rather wishes Munch hadn’t.
 
There is, though, one bit in the slow movement that you can see he really likes. Yes, you’ve guessed it. Poor harpsichord-starved Boston had no difficulty at all in rustling up a pair of cymbals for the clash Bruckner probably didn’t want anyway. And the cameramen adroitly catch Munch’s beaming smile as his favourite bit approaches before cutting to the player himself, who gives a cymbal clash to end all cymbal clashes.
 
The scherzo goes excitingly though in the trio Munch seems to want to hustle things on a bit.
 
And then the finale … outrageously fast at the outset and with a couple of cuts, it’s timed at 7:55 including applause, scarcely longer than the finale of the Haydn. A sad travesty.
 
In Munch’s defence, I suppose it may be said that the Boston public in 1958 was still not ready for real Brucknerian Bruckner. The conductor who offered them a metaphysical meditation in the manner of late Celibidache in those years would have had an empty hall by the end. Still, only a few years later Leinsdorf was presenting swift but firmly structured Bruckner. Anything of that on film, I wonder?
 
The list of works I’d like to see Munch conduct live is pretty long, not just the obvious Berlioz, Franck, Debussy and Ravel but Beethoven, Schubert, Mendelssohn, Schumann, Brahms. Also Tchaikovsky. And the many American works he premièred. But, did whoever chose this Bruckner do so with the idea of enhancing Munch’s reputation or of damaging it? Whether or not the latter was intended, it’s likely to be the result.
 
Christopher Howell
 
Masterwork Index: Bruckner Symphony 7 ~~ Haydn London Symphonies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


EXPLORE MUSICWEB INTERNATIONAL

Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews

 

Discographies
   Composer
      Composer surveys
   National
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
.
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

Interviews
With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site

Nostalgia

Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Comment
Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure

Announcements

 

Community
Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Reviewers
Pat and present

Helpers invited!

Resources
How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips


Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Publishers
Other links
Newsgroups
Web News sites etc

PotPourri
A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Questionnaire    
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Dictionary
Magazines
Newsfeed  
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools






Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.