Brahms and Schoenberg have much in common, their historicism, 
                  their devotion to the Austro-German canon, their learning, the 
                  Viennese pedigree of their works ... but the one thing that 
                  would seem to separate them is the noise their music makes. 
                  
                    
                  Shai Wosner is evidently out to prove that contention wrong. 
                  The centrepiece of this programme is a performance of the Brahms 
                  Op.116 Fantasias interspersed with Schoenberg's Op.19 piano 
                  pieces. Does it work? Well, yes the musical coherency and intrigue 
                  of the result is undeniable. Historically the distance is less 
                  than you might think, the Brahms being very late and the Schoenberg 
                  relatively early. More important, perhaps, is the fact that 
                  the Schoenberg is Expressionist rather than serial, and clearly 
                  owes much to Brahms' late works. That said, you are very unlikely 
                  to confuse the two composers, the issue of tonality - however 
                  loose - is the clear divider. There is also a discipline about 
                  all of Brahms' piano music that Schoenberg rarely shares. But 
                  Wosner is clearly soliciting individual opinions about the musical 
                  relationships between the two composers, so you'll have to decide 
                  for yourself at what level, if any, the musical styles meet. 
                  
                    
                  This Op.116/Op.19 experiment is framed by two large works, each 
                  an early but major contribution to the repertoire. To begin, 
                  we hear the Schoenberg Op.25 Suite, and for me this is the highlight 
                  of the disc. The work is historically significant for being 
                  the first in which Schoenberg uses his serial technique consistently 
                  from beginning to end. As is so often the case with historical 
                  landmarks, it is studied and discussed far more than it is heard. 
                  That's a real shame, because it is a great piece. It is one 
                  of those 20th century works which is obviously very 
                  difficult to play, or rather to interpret, but is also quite 
                  demure and so does not give the pianist many chances to show 
                  off his skills. It is structured as a baroque suite with each 
                  of the movements in dance form, but paradoxically, the rhythmic 
                  identities of each of these dance genres are almost completely 
                  ignored and Schoenberg instead injects energy and propulsion 
                  with his own more sophisticated rhythmic ideas. The success 
                  of Wosner's performance is largely down to his feeling for the 
                  detail. He really focuses in on the relationships between successive 
                  notes and chords, which given the detail of Schoenberg's score 
                  is surely appropriate. You get the feeling that the dynamic 
                  and placing of every note has been painstakingly considered. 
                  And just as importantly, the music retains its immediacy and 
                  spontaneity, even in the face of some heavy intellectualising 
                  from both the composer and the pianist. It is a tricky balancing 
                  act to interpret this music effectively, but Wosner is clearly 
                  up to the task. 
                    
                  The final work on the disc is the Brahms Handel Variations Op.24. 
                  Like the Schoenberg Op.25, this represents the composer's first 
                  significant mature contribution to the piano repertoire. Wosner 
                  takes a more laid-back approach to this music, he lets the melodies 
                  sing more and doesn't worry so much about the internal balance 
                  of the textures. This more lyrical approach is surely what the 
                  music requires, but it sits uneasily with the programme's aims 
                  of comparing Brahms and Schoenberg. The Brahms Op.25, especially 
                  when played like this, is closer to Schumann or even Schubert. 
                  But if the Brahms/Schoenberg idea does work - and I'm still 
                  undecided - it is because of the Brahms' multi-faceted musical 
                  persona. He was both progressive and conservative, and it is 
                  to Wosner's credit that he demonstrates both sides, both in 
                  his programming and in his playing. 
                    
                  The audio here is excellent. The piano is recorded in a fairly 
                  resonant acoustic, but the precision of Wosner's touch, of his 
                  articulation and of his pedalling, is such that no details are 
                  lost. Wosner has done both composers a service with this recording, 
                  but in the long run Schoenberg is going to come off better for 
                  his attentions. The performance of the Op.25 Suite that opens 
                  this programme is a real revelation. The Brahms is good too, 
                  but it is the Schoenberg I’ll be returning to soonest. 
                    
                  
                  Gavin Dixon