Aureole etc.




Nimbus on-line




If it’s the Czech works you’re after, do not hesitate

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Some items
to consider

 


Enjoy the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra wherever you are. App available for iOS and Android

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage


Decca Phase 4 - 40CDs


Judith Bailey, George Lloyd


BAX Orchestral pieces


CASKEN Violin Concerto

Schumann Symphonies Rattle


Complete Brahms
Bargain price

 


 
REVIEW



Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical

Hyperion

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
Alto
Arcodiva
Atoll
CDAccord
Cameo Classics
Centaur
Hallé
Hortus
Lyrita
Nimbus
Northern Flowers
Redcliffe
Sheva
Talent
Toccata Classics


Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing
sample
 

alternatively
CD: AmazonUK AmazonUS

Gustav MAHLER (1860-1911)
4 Movements

Totenfeier (1888)* [26:36)
Symphony No. 10: Adagio** [26:52]
Blumine (1884-1888) [7:22]
'What the wild flowers tell me' (Symphony 3 III, arr. Britten) [9:26]
Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra/Paavo Järvi
rec. Alte Oper, Frankfurt *February. 2008; **October 2007; hr-Sendesaal, Frankfurt (no date)
VIRGIN CLASSICS 2165762 [70:16]

Experience Classicsonline

With the best will in the world I’m not really sure I see the point of this disc, which seems to me to be a rather bits-and-pieces programme and not terribly satisfying.

There is one interesting link between two of the pieces, in the shape of Benjamin Britten. As Michael Kennedy points out in his characteristically interesting note, Britten became an enthusiast for Mahler’s music after attending a performance of the Fourth Symphony when he was aged seventeen. Indeed, there’s a live recording of Britten conducting that very symphony in 1961 and I share Tony Duggan’s enthusiasm for it (see review). I was interested to learn from Mr. Kennedy’s note that Britten conducted the first modern performance of ‘Blumine’ as a stand-alone piece at the Aldeburgh Festival in 1967. ‘Blumine’ was the second movement in the original five-movement version of Mahler’s First Symphony, but he excised it in 1896. It was not until 1968 that the five-movement version of the symphony was heard again. The ‘Blumine’ movement is occasionally included in recordings and performances of the symphony nowadays – though it’s more usual to hear it by itself. Personally, I find it an attractive, if rather slender and slight composition and I certainly wouldn’t wish to hear it impeding the flow of the familiar four-movement score. The best solution, perhaps, is that adopted by Sir Simon Rattle, who prefaced his EMI recording of the First Symphony by playing ‘Blumine’. That leaves listeners free to programme their CD player according to choice.

Järvi conducts a perfectly acceptable performance of ‘Blumine’ and the same verdict applies to his traversal of the excerpt from Mahler’s Third Symphony. This is a rarity of passing interest; an arrangement for small orchestra made by Britten in 1941, during his American sojourn. Frankly, there’s little more than curiosity value in this but, in fairness to Britten, it should be remembered that in 1941 opportunities to hear Mahler’s huge score were rare – Boult conducted the UK première six years later, in 1947.

The other two offerings are much more substantial. The Adagio of the Tenth Symphony was one of two performable movements left by Mahler when he died. As is well known, in the 1960s the scholar Deryck Cooke made a performing version of the full score. Since then there have been some other rival editions but none has really challenged the hegemony of the Cooke version. Cooke’s edition – never claimed by him as more than a performing version of the sketches – has been accepted by many conductors but, presumably, not by Paavo Järvi. As I made clear when I reviewed Michael Tilson Thomas’s recording recently, I’m unrepentantly in the Cooke camp. This is another decent performance – in fact, it’s probably the best and most convincing one on the disc. The orchestra plays well and Järvi’s control and shaping is impressive, without quite rivalling the best exponents of this symphony. But one is left with the question: why stop there? Indeed, that’s an opinion that Michael Kennedy seems to share for he concludes his note with the following statement: “If it [the Adagio] was all we had of this symphony it would satisfy. But what follows completes a masterpiece.” Quite so.

The opening item on Järvi’s programme is Totenfeier. This was the original first movement of Mahler’s Second Symphony and its composition dates back to about 1888. He added the title Totenfeier (‘Funeral Rite’) in 1891 but in 1894, before the symphony had been completed, he composed a revised version of the first movement in the form that we know it today. Totenfeier was then forgotten until quite recently and Michael Kennedy tells us that when Mahler played a movement bearing this title in a concert of his music in Berlin in 1896, the year following the première of the Second Symphony it was in fact the revised version, taken from the complete symphony, that was played.

In the last few years there have been a couple of recordings. The one which I’ve heard was made in 1999 by Riccardo Chailly and was issued as part of his complete Mahler cycle, coupled with his recording of the complete Second Symphony (see review). Structurally Totenfeier is pretty similar to the first movement of the Second Symphony. However, listeners who are familiar with the symphony will notice many differences of scoring and a few instances where bars were either added or deleted by Mahler during the revision. These differences are interesting but I have to say that in every respect Mahler’s second thoughts seem to me to be infinitely preferable.

Järvi’s performance is somewhat disappointing, I think. The main criticism I’d have is that he relaxes excessively in the slower, more nostalgic episodes, such as the passage between 2:39 and 3:29. Indeed, the music almost becomes becalmed at one point (track 1 6:34 – 10:10) where Järvi’s slow speed not only makes the music sound laboured but also he then has to pick up speed quite rapidly in a way that seems unidiomatic; one wonders how often he’s conducted the full symphony. This tendency to linger excessively largely explains why his performance clocks in at 26:36, whereas the altogether tauter Chailly performance lasts for 23:10. Chailly also has several other things going for him. One is the fabulous playing of the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra, a band with the music of Mahler in its collective DNA. Furthermore, they’re recorded in the superb acoustic of the Concertgebouw, where the Decca engineers achieved some fine results. And finally, I think Chailly is a much better – perhaps more experienced? - Mahler conductor. If one must have a recording of this early Mahler draft – which certainly is not devoid of interest – then the Chailly version is the one to have and his coupling, as an appendix to the Second Symphony, is much more logical.

Throughout this programme the playing of the Frankfurt orchestra and the recorded sound are good, if not quite of top-notch quality. Järvi’s conducting is efficient but on this evidence he’s not exceptional as a Mahler conductor. The disc is of modest interest as a collection of Mahler fragments but I wouldn’t regard it as an essential purchase. Frankly, this is not a disc that set my pulse racing.

John Quinn

see also review by Ralph Moore
 


EXPLORE MUSICWEB INTERNATIONAL

Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews

 

Discographies
   Composer
      Composer surveys
   National
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
.
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

Interviews
With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site

Nostalgia

Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Comment
Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure

Announcements

 

Community
Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Reviewers
Pat and present

Helpers invited!

Resources
How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips


Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Publishers
Other links
Newsgroups
Web News sites etc

PotPourri
A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Questionnaire    
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Dictionary
Magazines
Newsfeed  
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools






Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.