Ian Venables - Elegy for Cello and Piano Op.2 (1980) 
                  
                The Elegy for cello and piano, Op.2 was composed in 1980 when 
                the composer was 25 years old: it is an early piece, yet one that 
                has stood the test of time. In this piece the composer has managed 
                to write a work that balances a debt to the tradition of British 
                music with an originality that belongs entirely to the composer. 
                
                  
                British composers have written a goodly number of works for the 
                cello. It is not necessary to rehearse all these compositions 
                here; save to point out that one of them, the Elgar Concerto is 
                a work that has caught the public imagination. Currently it sits 
                at No. 8 in the 2009 Hall of Fame on Classic FM. Many years ago 
                I upset a cellist friend by suggesting that although I appreciated 
                her instrument, I preferred the piano: it was nearly the end of 
                a beautiful friendship! However, the fact remains that four works 
                written for her instrument are on my list of ‘Desert Island Discs’ 
                – the Finzi and the Moeran Concertos, the Bridge Sonata and Kenneth 
                Leighton’s 
Veris Gratia. The current work could well be 
                another contender for packing in the seafarer’s trunk! 
                  
                Little has been written about Ian Venables’s Elegy, however the 
                pianist Graham Lloyd is enthusiastic about this piece and has 
                suggested that the middle section represents one of the best things 
                that Venables has composed. It is an opinion with which I agree. 
                
                
                Ian Venables (b.1955) has been composing virtually all his life. 
                He had formal studies with Richard Arnell at the Trinity College 
                of Music and latterly with John Joubert and Andrew Downes at the 
                Birmingham Conservatoire. Although Venables has gained a considerable 
                reputation as a songwriter he has also contributed a number of 
                fine chamber works to the catalogue. These include a String Quartet, 
                Op.32 and a Piano Quintet, Op. 27. Both these works are impressive 
                and are a major contribution to the genre. They have been described 
                in The Independent as “...lending a new late 20th century dimension 
                to the English pastoral ...” 
                  
                The earlier compositions by Venables tend to be for a chamber 
                ensemble or for piano. The first work to receive an opus number 
                was the Piano Sonata which was written in 1975 and revised four 
                years later: this owes much to the music of Shostakovich. The 
                Prelude, Op.3 that follows on chronologically from the Elegy has 
                been likened to Scriabin. Lloyd suggests that 
The Stourhead 
                Follies, Op.4 for piano is the first work to express “the 
                true 'English' nature of Venables' music.” This suite from 1984 
                was inspired by a visit to the National Trust property in Wiltshire. 
                The composer has written that ‘… this memorable visit left a deep 
                impression upon me and prompted me to try and recreate in music, 
                the evocative and atmosphere of the gardens’. 
                  
                The Elegy is hardly an ‘elegy’ in the accepted sense of the word. 
                It was not composed in sorrow or lamentation over the death of 
                an individual. Instead it was written at a time when Venables 
                feared the ‘death’ of a love affair. This is a deeply personal 
                work and was composed in an ‘outburst of emotion.’ The composer 
                told me that he believes the feelings of loss associated with 
                death and an unrequited love affair can be very similar. The work 
                was written quickly: Venables was ‘quite carried away in a rush 
                of inspiration.’ Yet this urgency has not resulted in a work that 
                is unbalanced, slipshod or less than perfect. 
                  
                There have been a fair few examples of ‘Elegies’ for cello and 
                piano composed over the years by British composers. One thinks 
                of examples by Frank Bridge (Elégie) William Busch, Christopher 
                Bunting and Kenneth Leighton. With the exception of Bridge none 
                of these pieces has become a repertoire piece: both the Bridge 
                and the Leighton have been recorded. Ian Venables has not used 
                any of these works as an example. In fact, it is not clear whether 
                there is a conscious exemplar for this work. The circumstances 
                of the Elegy suggest that the piece was written without reference 
                to other music, save what had been absorbed through the composer’s 
                study. 
                  
                It was dedicated to the cellist Anthony Gammage. The first performance 
                was in January 1981 by the dedicatee and the pianist Andrew Wadsworth 
                at St Martin's-in- the-Fields, London. The piece was well received 
                by the audience. It is regarded by critics as being one of the 
                composer’s deepest and most personal works “combining lyricism 
                with a passionate intensity”. 
                  
                The Elegy is written in a kind of ternary form, although the composer’s 
                typical use of material means that the subjects are actually not 
                repeated in an identical manner. The work could be described as 
                A B C B
1 A
1 (Coda) There is a short concluding 
                cadenza before the cello restates the opening piano theme. For 
                most of the piece the cello has the dominant role, although the 
                pianist does give the impassioned cry of pain at the start of 
                the work, which is not taken up by the soloist until the last 
                few bars of the work. The pianist’s part is largely supportive, 
                consisting mainly of chordal writing. 
                  
                Venables’ use of harmony relies on a careful juxtaposition of 
                simple but ultimately appropriate triadic chords with added notes. 
                For example, at one of the climaxes in this piece (bar 56) the 
                entire effect is simply an E minor chord with added minor 7th. 
                Yet the result is heart breaking. Perhaps the most effective chord 
                occurs in the third last bar of the piece – it is an F# major 
                chord with added B and A which resolves onto a simple B minor 
                triad. It is the crown of the work. 
                  
                The Elegy is signed as ‘adagietto’ which is a little faster that 
                ‘adagio.’ The second theme is introduced as ‘misterioso.’ Toward 
                the end of the work the composer asks the soloist to play ‘appassionato.’ 
                
                  
                Metrically the work is diverse with a variety of time signatures, 
                including considerable use of 5/4 although there are a fair few 
                bars written in 3/4 waltz time. 
                  
                Dynamically the work is written at a fairly sustained level, there 
                being only one 
ff outburst in the closing bars. This means 
                that the cellist has to play in a nuanced style rather than rely 
                on extreme volume contrasts. The melodic part calls for clear 
                articulation and sensitive bowing, but is never overly difficult 
                or complex with the exception of the short cadenza. The accompanied 
                choral (the C section) is a beautiful moment, with the cellist 
                providing an effective counterpoint to the chorale-like chords 
                from the pianist. If the opening ‘misterioso’ chords are harbingers 
                of ‘death’ then this seven bar passage is a shaft of light and 
                hope. 
                  
                At present the Elegy for cello and piano is not available on CD 
                or MP3 download. However an excellent performance of this work 
                has been uploaded to 
YouTube. 
                It is played by the talented young cellist Nathan Chan who was 
                only thirteen at the time of recording (12th August 2007): he 
                is accompanied on this presentation by Graham Lloyd. I understand 
                from the composer that a CD of his chamber music including the 
                Elegy and the excellent Piano Quintet will be released later this 
                year on the SOMM label. 
                  
                This short work is an excellent example of British chamber music. 
                In spite of the fact that it was an ‘early’ work from the composer, 
                and was written in the heat of passion, it is a well-made piece 
                that deserves to be in the repertoire. Its antecedents probably 
                lie with Finzi’s Cello Concerto and certain of that composer’s 
                more acerbic moments. Venables’ Elegy is not a full-blown example 
                of ‘pastoral’ in spite of the fact that it nods in this direction. 
                There is depth to this piece that defies slotting into a specific 
                genre. There are no easy answers to be found in this Elegy: it 
                ends in “an unresolved and questioning mood”. Yet it is also heart-easing. 
                It is difficult to listen to this work without engaging in the 
                composer’s pain – for who has not loved and lost? 
                  
                
John France  
                  January 2010