This is the third installment in Stéphane Denève’s acclaimed
                  Roussel symphony cycle. I had the privilege of reviewing the
                  disc containing the Symphony No. 2 for this 
                  website and am happy to have it again here. Whereas I was
                  not at all acquainted with the latter work, I have heard the
                  Symphony No. 1 a few times in the past, through Charles Dutoit’s 
                  recording. Even more than the Second Symphony, this rarely performed 
                  first effort on his part sounds little like the neo-classical 
                  composer Roussel was to become in his later, and arguably greater 
                  symphonies. Here the main influences are his teacher Vincent 
                  d’Indy and especially Claude Debussy. Indeed, the symphony,
                  which has the title of Poem of the Forest, is more like an
                  impressionistic
                  four-part symphonic poem than a true symphony. The four movements
                  of the work portray the cycle of the seasons, as follows: The 
                  Forest in Winter, Renewal, Summer Evening, and Fauns 
                  and Dryads. Each movement is longer than the preceding
                  one, with the first movement lasting slightly more than five
                  minutes
                  and the last one over fourteen. The symphony has a somewhat
                  cyclic structure, too, something Roussel inherited from César 
                  Franck, d’Indy’s teacher. The symphony ends quietly as it began.
                  While the symphony recalls Debussy in its delicate orchestration,
                  e.g., the flute and harp duet in the last movement, and its
                  generally impressionist mood, there are hints of the Roussel
                  to come. This is clear particularly in the last movement beginning
                  at about the 1:26 mark where one can hear a pre-echo of the
                  ballet The Spider’s Feast. In any case, whether one
                  considers this a true symphony or a symphonic poem, the work
                  has a lyric
                  beauty that sustains one’s interest throughout. Denève and
                  the Scottish orchestra do not disappoint either and capture
                  the
                  essence of the symphony in a performance of subtlety and warmth. 
                  
                  The other works on the disc are rarer still. The Symphonic
                  Prelude, “Resurrection”, was the first work with which Roussel made his 
                  debut an orchestral composer. The work’s title comes from Leo 
                  Tolstoy’s novel of the same name, but otherwise bears little 
                  resemblance to the novel’s didacticism. It is as fully developed 
                  in its ten-minute length and sounds much like a continuation 
                  of the symphony with its flute and horn solos, though it is 
                  more romantic than impressionistic in its mood. It contains 
                  some memorable themes in the brass that call to mind Wagner’s Parsifal.
                  As with the symphony, it begins and ends quietly. The final
                  work on the disc is incidental music Roussel composed
                  for a pantomime, best translated as “The Sandman,” by the dramatist 
                  George Jean-Aubry. Like the other pieces on the disc, gentleness 
                  and a quiet mood predominate. The work is scored for flute, 
                  clarinet, horn, harp and string quartet. Here the option of 
                  using orchestral strings rather than a quartet is taken. Of 
                  the three works, I found this the most like Debussy in its atmosphere 
                  and orchestral color. It contains some ravishing horn, clarinet, 
                  and flute solos that haunt the mind. However, listening to this 
                  CD from beginning to end in one sitting can seem like too much 
                  of a good thing. I think it is best to select each work separately 
                  and pair it with a later Roussel opus or that of another composer. 
                  As with the symphony, Denève and the orchestra do total justice 
                  to both of these “fillers”. If I am not quite as enthusiastic 
                  about this release as I was the earlier one in the series I 
                  reviewed, it is largely because I did not find the programming 
                  as interesting, as varied. The performances themselves leave 
                  nothing to be desired. Thus, if you are collecting this series 
                  — and all fans of Roussel should be — do not hesitate to add
                  this to your collection. Again, Richard Whitehouse provides
                  expert notes and the presentation with its cover reproduction
                  of The Valley of the Sedelle in Crozant by Guillaumin 
                  is up to Naxos high standards. 
                
Leslie Wright
                      
                      see also review by Nick Barnard