This is the second volume of Thomas Sanderling’s promised
                complete set of the orchestral music of Taneyev. It includes
                three mature works that are well-known. We also get to hear four
                earlier works that the composer never allowed to be published,
                and which, like a number of others, were only released to the
                world in the 1950s. This is a shame because all four demonstrate
                that Taneyev was already a notable composer very early in his
                career. 
                
                Two of the works date from the composer’s student years.
                The overture in D-minor was his graduation piece and won an award.
                It is rather somber, with a Tchaikovskian lyricism combined with
                an underlying sense of unease. The central section features the
                woodwinds and is beautifully developed. At this point (19 years
                old) he still has trouble getting everything he wants from his
                basic material, but that would come later. However the devopment
                of this material into a cheerful finale is quite skillful. Also
                from 1875 is the Adagio in C-major. This is a lyrical work of
                great songfulness, with intimations of future vocal pieces. Tchaikovsky
                and Mozart hang over it to a degree, but its sheer beauty is
                the composer’s own. Why he would not want to publish it
                is a mystery. 
                
                Five years later Taneyev’s status as a mature composer
                was already assured enough for him to be asked to write the Cantata
                on Pushkin’s “
Exegi Monumemtum”. This
                is a setting of the first two verses of the poem of that name
                and was written for the unveiling of the Pushkin Monument in
                Moscow. It is quite simple, but evocative of the poet’s
                themes of the impermanence of political life when contrasted
                with the permanence of art. It has some beautiful polyphony and
                orchestration. Two years later Taneyev wrote a much large work
                that is one of his very few with a folk basis. The 
Overture
                on a Russian Theme takes the composer’s usual compositional
                method of developing segments of one theme and applies it to
                a theme from a folk collection compiled by Rimsky-Korsakov. The
                entire theme itself is hardly heard at all, but parts of it constantly
                succeed each other in a variety of different moods, ranging from
                the dramatic to the lyrical. The woodwinds are skillfully used
                throughout - a frequent feature of the composer’s works.
                While the slower middle section gets a little too involved, it
                is succeeded by an excellent sequential passage on strings that
                leads to the finale - a glorification of the original theme.
                This work compares well with similar pieces by the composer’s
                contemporaries and should be better known. 
                
                The 
Canzona and the 
Oresteia works 
were published
                by Taneyev and have been popular in Russia ever since. The 
Canzona is
                one of the composer’s few concerted works and is both virtuosic
                and tender with a middle section reminiscent of the clarinet
                works of Weber. The wistful end could only be Taneyev. There
                is a competing recording of the piece on Naxos with Vytautas
                Sondeckis, but I found Jankovsky’s version preferable for
                its liveliness. Taneyev arranged the piece for cello and piano
                and it has been recorded in this form several times, including
                by Rostropovich 
(see
                review). 
                
                Soon after beginning 
The Oresteia, his only opera, the
                composer started turning the material into a symphonic poem,
                which he published as a separate work, and then went on to compose
                the full opera, premiered five years or so after the symphonic
                poem. The poem is based on five themes representing various aspects
                of the Aeschylus play and the exposition of the themes is extremely
                dramatic. The composer later occasionally gets carried away by
                the violence of the music for the Furies, but those sections
                representing the feelings of Orestes are always well done. This
                leads to the highlight of the piece - the judgment that Orestes
                is innocent of matricide by Athena and the Areopagus and the
                final apotheosis of Athenian justice. The major competition for
                Sanderling in this piece is provided by Vladimir Ashkenazy and
                Neeme Järvi. I found Sanderling more gripping than Ashkenazy 
(see
                review) and with a better sense of the overall work. With
                Järvi there is slightly more excitement and a slightly better
                recording, but Sanderling has the cost advantage. 
                
                The Act 3 Entr’acte from the opera proper concerns Orestes’ journey
                to Apollo’s temple at Delphi to find out how to rid himself
                of the Furies. The main musical element here is Apollo’s
                shimmering theme as he banishes the Furies from his temple and
                sends Orestes to Athens for his eventual pardon. This section
                shows a tighter development than the appearance of the same material
                in the symphonic poem. It was also recorded by Ashkenazy and
                more excitingly by Svetlanov 
(see
                review). 
                
                In comparing this disc with the first volume of the series, Symphonies
                1 and 3, recorded a year before this one, several developments
                are obvious 
(see
                review). The first is that Thomas Sanderling has a much better
                control over the orchestra and that the ragged playing that afflicted
                sections of the earlier disk is gone. His ability to alternate
                between dramatic and lyrical is really first rate. The second
                is that the orchestra seems to have accommodated itself to the
                music to a greater degree. The brass and percussion are exemplary
                in the 
Oresteia poem and the woodwinds are a highlight
                in almost every piece. Finally, the engineers seem to have mastered
                the Studio of West-Siberian Radio and acoustics are no longer
                a problem. All of this makes for a superior disc. There are also
                exemplary notes by Anastasia Belina. One can have no hesitation
                in recommending this disc not only to Taneyev lovers, but as
                an example of the range of creativity of a composer still far
                from receiving his due in the general history of music. 
                
                
William Kreindler
                
                see also review by Dan
                Morgan