The first piece of Rautavaara I heard was a broadcast – in fact 
                the first UK broadcast – of Cantus Arcticus. I was captivated. 
                However encountering distant or distorted tapes of Sarbu’s radio 
                relay of the Violin Concerto and a Berglund-conducted Third Symphony 
                had my enthusiasm cooling. When I saw this limited edition boxed 
                set being issued by the label that has done more for Rautavaara 
                than any other it was time to renew acquaintance. 
              
It comes as less 
                  of a surprise that the First Symphony is so redolent 
                  of 1940s and 1950s Americana when one realises that it was written 
                  while Rautavaara was studying in the USA under a Koussevitsky 
                  scholarship. The work has a springy sense of renewal and tension 
                  that I associate with Schuman and Harris. Mix this with the 
                  high-flown romantic manner of William Alwyn's First Symphony 
                  and you know what to expect. I say this even if the genial and 
                  slightly acid-bright finale looks towards Shostakovich.
                
The Second Symphony 
                  is heard here in a version revised by the composer in 1984. 
                  A short symphony, it’s still longer than the 16:35 of the Fourth. 
                  It is a work cast over with foreboding, angular and gawky, awkward 
                  and splendid, angry and heaving with noisy protest. It has some 
                  echoes of 1950s Stravinsky along the way.
                
The Third Symphony 
                  is from 1961 and like its successor is dodecaphonic. It 
                  operates as a very inventive commentary and cross-fertilisation 
                  with the Bruckner symphonies - especially the Fourth. Laced 
                  with birdsong and tension this is music that hums with the current 
                  of invention. Though you may in general be allergic this is 
                  a work of one of one of dodecaphony’s most lucid and undogmatic 
                  exponents. The emergence of the horn-call - which returns for 
                  the finale - from a tensely rippling mystery at the very start 
                  is unmistakable. Birdsong and ebullience are part of the weave 
                  which even approaches the jocular in the finale.
                
The Fourth Symphony 
                  is more obliquely expressed and less like Cantus Arcticus. 
                  It is a work blasted and blasting with winding dissonance and 
                  the mannered flurries and eddies of the early 1960s mainstream. 
                  It recalls the Richard Rodney Bennett Third Symphony, once to 
                  be heard on a Koch International CD. The work’s emergence was 
                  labyrinthine. The original Fourth Symphony was written in 1964 
                  but even after rewriting it in 1968 the composer was unhappy. 
                  Discarding it altogether, he then dubbed a work previously called 
                  Arabescata from 1962, yet not a symphony, as his 
                  Fourth Symphony. And this is what we hear. The compact notes 
                  by Kimmo Korhonen claim it as the only Finnish serialist symphony. 
                  It is most lucidly recorded.
                
The first four symphonies 
                  by Rautavaara were written in fairly quick succession in the 
                  bridge across the 1950s into the 1960s. The last of that four 
                  had proved a hard passage of arms. The composer left the form 
                  alone for two decades, resuming with the Fifth Symphony in 
                  1986. This is a very different single-movement work of 31 minutes 
                  duration. It has a slow evolutionary gait and possesses a closer 
                  engagement with the lyrical. A dazzle of birdsong is in there 
                  just like the slow impressive unfold of Cantus Arcticus. 
                  Its lustrous glowing purity and sturdy confident progress is 
                  deeply impressive. It perhaps recalls Messiaen in its slowly 
                  disintegrating magnificent explosions of sound. In this Rautavaara 
                  shares a sound-world with his lesser known adopted Finnish contemporary 
                  Friedrick Bruk. Something very similar can be heard in Bruk’s 
                  indelibly impressive Pohjolan Legends Symphony.
                
The Sixth Symphony 
                  Vincentiana is in four movements: I. Starry Night 
                  [19:29]; II. The Crows [6:15]; III. Saint-Rémy [7:50]; IV. Apotheosis 
                  [8:22]. This work is unique for Rautavaara in being derived 
                  from his opera Vincent (1987). The Symphony itself is 
                  from 1992. Tapiola-like gales ply the northern wastes and mass 
                  stridulation of silvery insects shakes the rafters. The work's 
                  phantasmagoric effect is intensified by the discreet use of 
                  synthesiser. This is most adeptly and naturally resolved into 
                  the sound of the orchestra. The ‘look and feel’ of this work 
                  suggests the science fiction landscapes of the novels of C.S. 
                  Lewis - a literary reference last occurring to me when listening 
                  to Silvestrov's Fifth Symphony. After the first two movements 
                  - in which the delightful stream of invention is buttressed 
                  by synthesiser - the smiling gleam of Sibelian woodwind characterises 
                  the Saint-Rémy movement. As it progresses we return to the silvery 
                  shimmer of the earlier movements. The final apotheosis is simply 
                  glorious - almost Debussian in its steadily unwinding melodic 
                  confidence and summery ease - grand and endlessly rewarding. 
                  This great cavalcade of a symphony delights in avian voices 
                  and a perfect poise balanced between the numinous Messiaen and 
                  the delicate Ravel.
                
The Seventh Symphony 
                  is candidly lyrical. Its fabric and progress is yet more 
                  naturally flowing than the Sixth. Its almost Scriabin-like ecstasy 
                  recalls the orchestral writing of David Mathews reflected in 
                  the recent Chandos CD – not to be missed - of The Music of 
                  Dawn. The splintery second movement scherzo, with its passing 
                  refracted echoes of Shostakovich, seems an interloper in this 
                  company. The third movement partakes of the same angelic pristine 
                  air as the outer movements of Panufnik's Sinfonia Sacra yet 
                  has about it more invention. A lot is going on amid all this 
                  serenity. The Tallis-like contemplation is mixed with avian 
                  effervescence in the finale. One can also draw parallels here 
                  with the otherworldliness of Hovhaness and with the benediction 
                  of Vaughan Williams’ Fifth Symphony.
                
The Eighth Symphony 
                  was commissioned by the Philadelphia. Again it is in four 
                  movements. Alongside the sense of a continental river flow we 
                  hear a slightly dissonant harmonic tang. The second movement 
                  reminds me of the First Symphony in its connection with the 
                  sound of the American symphonies of the 1950s. The third movement 
                  Tranquillo has the pleasingly bubbling mystery of the 
                  first movement of the Third Symphony yet it is not at all dissonant. 
                  The imagery of a great river returns for the finale blended 
                  with a sort of Slavonic chant and a Hovhaness-like gravity of 
                  expression. This wonderful lambent writing has towering grandeur.
                
These recordings 
                  were produced in collaboration with the composer between 1990 
                  and 2005. They have been previously released by Ondine but with 
                  different couplings.
                
With some 30 Rautavaara 
                  entries in the Ondine catalogue the composer has been done considerable 
                  justice by this gifted label. He must survey it with great pleasure 
                  - he certainly deserves to. This set provides a sure route to 
                  appreciate one of the grand voices of the last century. He speaks 
                  with eloquence and with the engaged rasp and embrace of originality. 
                  The music is lambent and Rautavaara’s creative journey leads 
                  from dissonance to lyrical awe.
                  
                  Rob Barnett