Bernard Haitink 
                  became principal conductor of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra 
                  in 2006, some thirty years after he first appeared with them. 
                  Like many of the world’s other major orchestras they are now 
                  venturing into “own-label” territory. This is the second release 
                  on the new label, the first being a recording of Mahler’s Third, 
                  also conducted by Haitink.
                
Both orchestra and 
                  conductor have outstanding Brucknerian credentials. The US première 
                  of this work was given in Chicago in 1886 just two years after 
                  the composer’s first triumph in Leipzig, and the orchestra recorded 
                  for Decca a complete cycle of the symphonies under Solti. As 
                  for Haitink, he made his name in Amsterdam with a complete recorded 
                  cycle dating from 1963-72 and then re-recorded some of works 
                  in Amsterdam and others in Vienna. Both his versions of the 
                  Seventh were made in Amsterdam – in 1966 and 1978 – and they 
                  are quite different. The latter reading is broader, more deeply-felt, 
                  better-recorded and finer in just about every way. It is also 
                  long-deleted whilst the 1966 effort continues to be available 
                  on a Philips Duo (see review) 
                  and in the complete series (Philips 4756740).
                
The present performance 
                  is a conglomerate of multiple live performances – the dates 
                  suggest as many as four although perhaps there is some rehearsal 
                  material or post-concert patching? I don’t think it is possible 
                  to tell or that there is anything wrong with such methods. Indeed 
                  this sounds like a live performance but with hardly any intrusion 
                  by the audience.
                
Haitink’s interpretation 
                  has not changed greatly over thirty years. The trend towards 
                  broadening of tempi has continued but it is marginal. He allows 
                  himself even greater expressive freedom, as I have often felt 
                  he tends to do in live performance compared to the studio. Overall, 
                  it is about as good a version of this work as I have ever heard. 
                  Haitink is equally at home in all four movements and conjures 
                  simply fabulous playing from all sections of the orchestra. 
                  There is a natural flow, and inevitability, about the way he 
                  deals with Bruckner’s large structures and sheer magic in the 
                  transitions, especially in the first movement. The adagio is 
                  not as elegiac as some (e.g. Karajan) but I think the farewell 
                  to Wagner can be overplayed and it certainly isn’t here. The 
                  scherzo is a little more analytical and less rustic than before 
                  while the finale brings a truly fitting peroration. Incidentally, 
                  Richard Osborne in the Gramophone suggests that Haitink 
                  is “grandstanding” at the very end, a comment I find hard to 
                  understand.
                
The recorded sound 
                  presents an excellent perspective with clarity and the documentation 
                  is reasonable for an upper mid-price issue. No information is 
                  given regarding the edition used but it matters little for this 
                  symphony. As previously in Haitink’s recordings, the debatable 
                  cymbal clash is given at the climax of the slow movement and 
                  magnificent it sounds too.
                
With regard to competition, 
                  this issue leaves Loughran live in Aarhus well behind (review). 
                  It is also preferable to Karajan’s 1970 studio recording (review) 
                  and a plausible current top choice for the work. I am not sure 
                  that it is a greater recording than Haitink’s 1978 version but 
                  that is irrelevant to prospective purchasers at the moment.
                
              
A disc which celebrates 
                a potentially very fruitful musical marriage. This should be heard 
                by all Brucknerians.
                
                Patrick C Waller