Last year Naxos released the fifth and final volume in their 
                  edition of the complete Piano Sonatas and Sonatinas of German 
                  composer Ferdinand Ries (review). 
                  That series was started and completed after their launch 
                  in 2005 of the complete Piano Concertos, also in five volumes, 
                  which finally comes to end with this disc. Ries's discography 
                  on Naxos is something to be grateful for, indeed - matched at 
                  the moment only by CPO's, where, most notably, Howard Griffiths 
                  and the Zurich Chamber Orchestra have recorded Ries's eight 
                  Symphonies on four discs, also available as a good-value boxed 
                  set (review).  
                  
                  
                  Youngish Austrian pianist Christopher Hinterhuber and Naxos 
                  stalwart - not to mention period expert - Uwe Grodd have been 
                  a team since volume I, and their collaborations in this final 
                  effort are poised, detailed and appealingly atmospheric. Another 
                  quality performance in the NZSO's discography underlines their 
                  status as a very decent outfit.  
                  
                  In his informative notes, Allan Badley writes that "Ries's cycle 
                  of fourteen works for piano and orchestra stands as one of the 
                  finest musical achievements of the early decades of the nineteenth 
                  century." For many this will be a contentious, if not faintly 
                  daft, statement. Yet popularising musical historians sometimes 
                  seem loath to acknowledge the existence of any music from this 
                  period - Schubert, Weber and Paganini's aside - that is not 
                  by Beethoven. They all but discount extremely valuable contributions 
                  to art music from the likes of Hummel, Rejcha, Czerny, Dussek, 
                  Eberl, Spohr, Kuhlau, Onslow, Field - to name but a few contemporaries 
                  who influenced Beethoven and/or were widely admired in their 
                  time. 
                    
                  Ries himself is still more often than not relegated to a historical 
                  footnote as piano pupil, friend, 'agent', biographer and performer 
                  of Beethoven. Though Badley may slightly overstate Ries's case, 
                  he is by no means a minor talent, certainly as far as piano 
                  composition is concerned. He wrote prolifically for his instrument 
                  to great acclaim in his time, both by the public and his contemporaries.  
                  
                  
                  Ries is an early Romantic in spirit and form, though he would 
                  never disavow his Classical roots. In these three works he can 
                  be heard to inhabit a realm somewhere between Mozart and Hummel. 
                  The Concertos are dramatic, expressive and very elegantly done, 
                  imbued with melodic creativity and splendid flourishes of orchestral 
                  colour.  
                  
                  Throughout this series, Naxos's website has perpetuated the 
                  unhelpful numbering system often attached to Ries's Concertos. 
                  For example, the G minor is labelled "Piano Concerto no.9", 
                  which does not in fact exist - Ries wrote only eight. So it 
                  is with the E flat work: not his "Piano Concerto no.2", as the 
                  site states, but his 'no.1'. The source of this error is explained 
                  in the booklet notes: Ries's first published concerto, which 
                  he called 'Concerto no.1', was for violin and orchestra. 
                  He followed it with eight for piano and orchestra, numbering 
                  them 'Concerto no.2' and so on, up to 'Concerto no.9' - that 
                  is, Piano Concertos nos. 1 to 8. 
                    
                  Nor is that the end of the complications. In fact, Ries's "no.6" 
                  was his First Piano Concerto proper, whereas "no.2" was most 
                  likely his Third! The explanation here lies in the fact that 
                  Ries published them all when it suited his purposes, rather 
                  than according to date of composition. The following table clarifies 
                  the true ordering: 
                
                   
                    Composition order  | 
                    Published order  | 
                    Traditional title  | 
                  
                   
                    1 (1806)  | 
                    5 (1824)  | 
                    Concerto no.6  | 
                  
                   
                    2 (1809)  | 
                    3 (1823)  | 
                    Concerto no.4  | 
                  
                   
                    3 (1811)  | 
                    1 (1812)  | 
                    Concerto no.2  | 
                  
                   
                    4 (1812)  | 
                    2 (1816)  | 
                    Concerto no.3  | 
                  
                   
                    5 (1814)  | 
                    4 (1823)  | 
                    Concerto no.5  | 
                  
                   
                    6 (1823)  | 
                    6 (1824)  | 
                    Concerto no.7  | 
                  
                   
                    7 (1826)  | 
                    7 (1828)  | 
                    Concerto no.8  | 
                  
                   
                    8 (1832-33)  | 
                    8 (1835)  | 
                    Concerto no.9  | 
                  
                
                 Source: Ferdinand 
                  Ries Society and  New Grove.  
                  
                  Not to be outdone, this disc's stirring Introduction et Rondeau 
                  Brillant has exactly the same title and length as one on 
                  volume 4! 
                    
                  One drawback to volume 5 is audio quality, which is passable 
                  rather than outstanding. The main problem is the lack of depth, 
                  giving the recording something of a mono feel - fine for the 
                  'mp3 generation' perhaps, but not for audiophiles. In their 
                  25th anniversary year, Naxos should by now have got this right 
                  - every recording, no matter what its provenance, should 
                  match the quality of their best. Like volume 1, this disc was 
                  recorded in New Zealand at the Michael Fowler Centre - clearly 
                  the technical side of operations there needs to be looked at. 
                    
                  
                  Byzantion 
                  
                  Collected reviews and contact at artmusicreviews.co.uk 
                
                
                   
                    Support 
                        us financially by purchasing this disc from:  | 
                  
                   
                     | 
                     | 
                  
                   
                     | 
                     | 
                  
                   
                     |