  | 
            | 
         
         
          |  
               
            
   
            
 alternatively 
              CD: MDT 
              AmazonUK 
              AmazonUS  | 
            Claude DEBUSSY 
              (1862-1918)  
              Sonata for violin and piano in G minor, L 140 (1917) [14:16]  
              Edward ELGAR (1857-1934) 
               
              Sonata for violin and piano in E minor, op.82 (1918) [24:39]  
              Jean SIBELIUS (1865-1957) 
               
              Six humoresques for violin and piano, op. 87/89, arr. Ekman (1917-18) 
              [20:16]  
                
              Efi Christodoulou (violin)  
              Margaret Fingerhut (piano)  
              rec. 21-23 May 2010, Potton Hall, Suffolk  
                
              GUILD GMCD 7358 [59:11]   
           | 
         
         
          |  
            
           | 
         
         
           
             
               
                 
                  The three violin works on this disc are as contrasting as you 
                  would expect French, English and Finnish music to be. Played 
                  together, they turn out to have some unexpected similarities. 
                  The Debussy and Elgar sonatas and the Sibelius Humoresques were 
                  written between 1917 and 1918. They all turn out to be violin-dominated, 
                  rather than the piano being an equal partner as in the Kreutzer 
                  Sonata of Beethoven or the three violin sonatas of Brahms. In 
                  addition, each in its own way is somewhat elusive. The young 
                  Greek-born violinist Efi Christodoulou and her accompanist Margaret 
                  Fingerhut deserve praise for assembling such an enterprising 
                  collection.  
                     
                  The Debussy sonata which begins the disc is his last completed 
                  work. He intended to write a set of six sonatas, of which he 
                  was able to achieve only the Cello Sonata, the Sonata for Flute, 
                  viola and harp, and this work. The composition of the Violin 
                  sonata was overshadowed both by his final illness and the horrors 
                  of the Great War, which casts a shadow over its mood. The work 
                  is flighty, austere, elliptical and rather fragmentary in its 
                  thematic material.  
                     
                  On a first hearing I found Christodoulou and Fingerhut’s 
                  performance a bit lacking in direction. After revisiting a couple 
                  of earlier performances from Kyoko Takezawa and Dmitri Sitkovetsky, 
                  I found I liked it more; It is however the weakest performance 
                  on the disc. Christodoulou is rather deliberate in the first 
                  movement, taking between 30 and 40 seconds more than the other 
                  performances: not a great difference in itself, but quite a 
                  lot in a movement that runs to about 5 minutes. The Intermède 
                  was better, but still rather sluggish and literal in places, 
                  needing more lightness and fantasy. The finale begins with a 
                  burst of feverish animation which is well done. Christodoulou 
                  shows off the warmth on her G string in the later episodes and 
                  Fingerhut plays the repeated notes episode cleanly. The pulse 
                  is still fitful, however; both Takezawa and Sitkovetsky have 
                  a better understanding of where the music is going. They also 
                  bring more variety to the dynamics - Sitkovetsky starts the 
                  sonata in a particularly hushed fashion - and this brings a 
                  greater sense of light and shade.  
                     
                  The Elgar Violin sonata was also part of a late group of works, 
                  being written concurrently with the String quartet and Piano 
                  quintet over 1917-18. Like all of Elgar’s major works 
                  it is strongly emotional, but in quite an ambiguous way, so 
                  that it is difficult to put one’s finger on just what 
                  the feeling is at any time. In this way it rather resembles 
                  the Brahms Violin sonatas. It is written on the conventional 
                  three movement structure, the second having the character of 
                  an intermezzo, and the finale intended to be broad and relaxing 
                  after the intense first two movements.  
                     
                  Elgar’s Romantic phrases suit Christodoulou better than 
                  Debussy’s shorter motifs. She and Fingerhut play the unsettled 
                  beginning passionately; above forte, however, her tone can become 
                  harsh. The long arpeggio passage starts in a rather unvaried 
                  way, but builds to an impressive climax. The skittish beginning 
                  of the second movement lacks mystery, but Christodoulou plays 
                  the long phrases of the middle section with great concentration. 
                  The finale is expansive, but the sense of relaxation that Elgar 
                  intended is in short supply. Christodoulou tends to hit her 
                  straps a bit early in the crescendos, and the hard tone over 
                  forte again intrudes. This is not a recording that displaces 
                  Kennedy or Vengerov, but is a full-blooded reading and persuasive 
                  in its way.  
                     
                  The Sibelius Humoresques were originally written for violin 
                  and orchestra; the present recording is of the arrangement made 
                  by Sibelius biographer Karl Ekman in 1923 for violin and piano. 
                  They lack both the Romantic feeling of the Concerto, and the 
                  sense of hostile natural forces that underpins much of Sibelius’ 
                  music. In their insistent rhythms the faster pieces look forward 
                  to Bartók and Stravinsky; some others reminded me occasionally 
                  of Kreisler encores. Overall the work has a rather impersonal 
                  quality.  
                     
                  The episodic structure of the Humoresques lends itself well 
                  to Christodoulou’s straightforward approach, and the virtuosic 
                  writing allows her to show off her fine technique. She weaves 
                  an expressive line over the minimalist accompaniment of the 
                  first piece, and the double-stopping is cleanly done. The alternation 
                  of pizzicato and arco in the next piece is well managed, as 
                  is the bitten-off ending. Christodoulou indulges in some well-judged 
                  portamenti in the third, and the harmonics ring out nicely. 
                  She holds back the pulse with sensitivity in the fourth piece, 
                  and the high-lying phrase is well characterised. The fifth is 
                  a moto perpetuo with a rather Spanish flavour. Christodoulou’s 
                  agility is put to the test in the final piece, to which she 
                  responds in style.  
                     
                  There are several performances available of the original version 
                  of the Humoresques, but this arrangement has not previously 
                  been recorded. Christodoulou and Fingerhut make a good case 
                  for the Sibelius; while the Debussy is not an unqualified success, 
                  the Elgar is good enough for merit your attention.  
                     
                  Guy Aron  
                     
                 
                  
                  
                  
                 
                 
             
           | 
         
       
     
     |