Even before my copy had dropped through my letterbox, reviews
                of this CD could be read all over the place - mostly laudatory
                ones too. So I waited several weeks before listening. In fact
                I am, like everyone else, very impressed. I’ll explain. 
                
                I suspect that Jean-Efflam Bavouzet had expected to record Debussy’s
                complete piano music in the four volumes, already very well reviewed
                (see below). The chance arrival of the piano score of ‘Khamma’ seems
                to have set him on the path of also tackling the other two ballets
                for a single disc. In fact Debussy always produced for the ballet
                pianist a usable rehearsal version. In the case of the score
                for ’Jeux’ Bavouzet remarks in his additional essay
                (there is also a general one by Roger Nichols) “A note
                from the artist” that 
Jeux was “genuinely
                unplayable by one pianist”. This was mainly due to the
                composer’s habit of adding, above and below the basic staves,
                extra flourishes and phrases as an aide-memoire for the later
                orchestration. A few years ago Bavouzet made a four-hand version
                of the ballet but for this recording had to manage the performance
                alone and without any ‘jiggery-pokery’ in the recording
                booth. The result was “one of the most difficult works
                I have ever played”. 
                
                On opening the booklet one espies a rare photo of Debussy with
                that marvellous and under-rated composer André Caplet
                who died young in 1925. Debussy wrote to Caplet that in composing
                this Diaghilev-commissioned ballet “I forgot the troubles
                of the world so as to write music that was almost joyous with
                the rhythm of gay gestures ... I am thinking of orchestral colour
                that seems back-lighted”. At first I heard the work in
                its orchestral guise then I heard Bavouzet. Make no mistake,
                in the piano version much is lost but Bavouzet has a way of almost
                reproducing orchestral colour, with his touch, pedalling and
                phrasing - a truly remarkable achievement. It must be remembered
                that ‘Jeux’ is actually called a ‘Poème
                dansé’ and the ‘plot’ if I can call
                it that, is a somewhat erotic 
ménage à trois concerning
                three tennis players, two females and a male who, in the search
                for a tennis ball, dance both separately and in various pairs,
                and as a three-some eventually resulting in a combined kiss.
                This precedes the surprising arrival of a second tennis ball
                just before the music evaporates. Sadly for Debussy and Nijinsky
                whose ‘vulgar’ choreography Debussy failed to enjoy, ‘Le
                Sacre du Printemps’ hit the world just two weeks later
                and Debussy’s score was forgotten for fifty years. 
                
                Oddly enough ‘Khamma’ is also a ballet about a girl
                who dances herself to death. This time the ballet is set in ancient
                Egypt involving propitiation for the ‘sins’ of a
                besieged city. The music which represents Debussy at his most
                experimental consists of four scenes and a series of three internal
                dances the whole woven together with stylistic consistency. The
                composer only orchestrated the first three or four minutes. There
                was much confusion and argument about the orchestration and contractual
                details. Charles Koechlin orchestrated the rest after Debussy’s
                death. The first concert performance of the orchestral version
                - which I have not heard myself - took place in 1924. The piano
                version is remarkable in the orchestral effects which can so
                readily be heard. The trumpets near the beginning are, for example,
                particularly striking. I would like to hear what little Debussy
                did orchestrate. 
                
                It may be odd to think of Debussy as having been influenced by
                Stravinsky but the fact is that the plot of the ballet ‘La
                Boîte à Joujoux’ is not unlike that of ‘Petrushka’.
                Cardboard characters act out a love tragedy instead of circus
                dolls. In addition ‘La Boîte’ like ‘Khamma’ has
                a major role for the piano although, again, Debussy never completed
                it. André Caplet did that, and quite brilliantly too. 
                
                In fairness to produce a new ballet in 1913 on the eve of the
                Great War and just a few months after ‘Le Sacre’ was
                probably doomed. We should be grateful that Debussy was much
                inspired here by the games and toys of his seven year-old daughter
                ChouChou. Why not, after all the work is subtitled ‘Ballet
                pour enfants’. One way in which Debussy creates this atmosphere
                is by quoting children’s songs, especially in the final
                tableau. These songs include ‘Pop goes the weasel’;
                indeed you could have much fun playing ‘spot that tune’,
                what with Mendelssohn’s Wedding March and Debussy’s
                own ‘Danse Nègre’. Towards the end did I not
                also spot a quote from part two of ‘Le Sacre’? 
                
                We should be delighted that Debussy found the energy and patience
                to stick with the task of completing the ballet. It is great
                fun to listen to either version. However, as a stand-alone piano
                piece I am not so sure. Whereas ‘Khamma’ is integrated
                and almost symphonic in construction ‘La Boîte’ because
                of the nature of its material is a bit more fragmentary and programmatic.
                In addition the characters are individualised musically. For
                example the soldier can obviously be represented by a trumpet
                and a fanfare has been written for him. There is an enigmatic
                toy-waltz for the doll and a curious figure in seconds (
Petrushka again)
                for Punchinello. 
                
                My only criticism is that Chandos should have given the first
                tableau its own track instead of linking it to the Introduction.
                Otherwise this is a marvellous disc and the climax in so many
                ways of Bavouzet’s complete Debussy cycle. 
                
                
Gary Higginson 
                
                Reviews of previous volumes in this series
                Volume 1 CHAN10421
                Volume
                2 CHAN10443
                Volume
                3 CHAN10467