Aureole etc.




Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line




Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett

CD REVIEW



Some items
to consider

 


Enjoy the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra wherever you are. App available for iOS and Android

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage


Decca Phase 4 - 40CDs


Judith Bailey, George Lloyd


BAX Orchestral pieces


CASKEN Violin Concerto

Schumann Symphonies Rattle


Complete Brahms
Bargain price

 

alternatively AmazonUK   AmazonUS

 

 

Johann Sebastian BACH (1685–1750) arr. Robert SCHUMANN (1810–1856)
St John Passion (BWV 245)
Veronika Winter, Elisabeth Scholl (soprano); Gerhild Romberger (alto); Jan Kobow (tenor); Ekkehard Abele, Clemens Heidrich (bass)
Rheinische Kantorei, Trebles of the Kölner Domchor, Das Kleine Konzert/Hermann Max
rec. September 2006, Basilika Knechtsteden, Germany. DDD
CPO 7770912 [62:00 + 51:24]

 


Ask people which of Johann Sebastian Bach's Passions they prefer, and probably 9 out of 10 will answer: the St Matthew. The St John Passion has always been in the shadow of its larger counterpart. In the Netherlands, where I live, there is a long-standing tradition of performing the St Matthew every year. No such tradition exists in regard to the St John Passion. In particular the large number of arias make the St Matthew Passion the most popular, and many also consider it the most dramatic, although that is highly debatable. One could also argue that its more concise character and the relatively small number of arias make the St John Passion the more dramatic of the two. The difference in appreciation is not a phenomenon of our time. In the 19th century, when Bach's religious music was rediscovered, the difference in the appreciation of Bach's Passions was largely the same. The first performance of the St John Passion in the 19th century took place in Berlin in 1833, by the Berlin Singakademie, directed by Carl Friedrich Rungenhagen. The reception was rather lacklustre in comparison to the deep impression the first performance of the St Matthew Passion in 1826 made. The man responsible for this performance, Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, never paid any attention to the St John Passion.

Robert Schumann held a different opinion about the St John. Like many others he highly appreciated the St Matthew, but when he became acquainted with the St John - most likely by just studying the score - he was very impressed and from his writings one may conclude that he in fact preferred the smaller of Bach's two Passions. In 1849, in a letter to the director of music in Hamburg, Georg Dietrich Otten, he wrote: "But do you not also happen to find it much bolder, greater, and more poetic than the one based on the Gospel according to Matthew?" He considered the St Matthew Passion "not entirely free of lengthy passages, and indeed altogether much too long - whereas the other is as if pressed for time, though quite brilliant, especially in the chorus work, and what great art!".

While still in Dresden he started to perform choruses from the St John Passion in public performances of his own choir. When he moved to Düsseldorf, where he had been appointed director of music in 1850 he planned to perform the entire work. That wasn't easy: he faced the same problems Mendelssohn had to confront in his attempts to perform the St Matthew Passion. The main problem was the instrumentation: instruments like the lute and the viola d'amore were no longer in use and substitutes had to be employed. In addition a solution had to be found for the realisation of the basso continuo. He also had to find singers who were able to perform the solo parts. This in particular caused some sections to be omitted in the first performance which he conducted in 1851. Fortunately Schumann's conductor's score for this performance has been preserved. It contains much information about instrumentation, dynamics and articulation. But as some of his notes are rather rudimentary a modern performer has much work to do. Performers also have use their knowledge of Schumann's preferences regarding performance practice and of the aesthetic ideals of the time to create a convincing performance. Even so a modern realisation can never pretend to be a 'reconstruction' of Schumann's performance of 1851.

Although the booklet contains extensive programme notes it isn't always clear to what extent Schumann had 'arranged' Bach's score. Part of the problem is that some changes had to be made at the last moment because a particular singer was not available. The arias 'Mein teurer Heiland' and 'Zerfliesse mein Herze' were omitted in Schumann's performance. Here they are both performed. Unfortunately, though, the booklet doesn't make it totally clear as to what extent Schumann left notes as to what instruments he had prescribed. The programme notes are confusing about the aria 'Mein Jesu, ach!' - the text which replaced 'Erwäge' in Bach's fourth version of 1749. According to Thomas Synofzik this aria was elided from Schumann's performance, "probably mainly due to problems with the instrumentation". But in this performance it is sung. According to Hermann Max this aria was "eliminated on short notice from Schumann's performance". Do we have to conclude from this that Schumann wanted it to be performed and that he gave some indications in regard to its instrumentation? That remains a mystery.

It goes beyond the scope of this review to list all the changes Schumann made in comparison to the original. I'll just give some examples. As there was no tenor involved - apart from the interpreter of the Evangelist - the tenor solos are set for soprano. The basso continuo part is performed with piano, cello and double-bass. In the arioso 'Betrachte meine Seel' the part of the lute is given to clarinet and violas, whereas the two viola d'amore parts have to be played on muted violins. Although the aria 'Zerfließe mein Herze' was omitted by Schumann there are indications in his notes that he wanted the oboe da caccia part to be played on the basset horn - that is how it is performed here. The most drastic change comes in the instrumentation of the aria 'Es ist vollbracht'. In the slow section the part for viola da gamba is given to a viola, whereas the basso continuo is performed by viola and cello. In the fast section Schumann adds parts for two trumpets, underlining the triumphant character of the text. Trumpets in a Passion - that is probably too much to swallow for many modern listeners, even those who could live with all the other instrumentation changes.

It is not easy to perform an arrangement like this. In particular an ensemble which often performs baroque music - and will have performed Bach's St John Passion more than once - could easily play this work in too 'baroque' a fashion. Most of the turbae choruses, for instance, are sung at more or less the same speed and with the same flexibility as in baroque performances. I sometimes wondered whether the tempi were not too fast. On the other hand, the chorales are sung in a much more romantic fashion, for example in sometimes ignoring the fermatas at the end of the lines. The performance choices for the recitatives are interesting. For this interpretation Hermann Max used a book by Adolph Bernhard Marx (Die Kunst des Gesanges, 1826), whom Schumann admired. He "called for free treatment of the note values and rests in keeping with the rhetorical flow". Hermann Max rightly concludes that this reflects the practice of the baroque era. Therefore in this performance the recitatives are not that different from those adopted in 'authentic' performances of Bach's original score. The main difference is that no appogiaturas are sung, which was common practice in the baroque era.

There are also some deviations from the original in music and text. This is only referred to in the booklet but without further specification, as that would take too much space. There are changes which reflect the 'modernisation' of the German language - often the present tense is changed into past tense.

The key figure in any Passion performance is the Evangelist. This role is brilliantly sung by the German tenor Jan Kobow. His diction is impeccable, and he rightly adapts his articulation to follow the romantic performance model. The original soprano part is sung by Veronika Winter, who does so very well. Elisabeth Scholl sings the part which Bach gave to a tenor. Not only is this part technically demanding, its tessitura is rather high, and it is perhaps due to this fact that Schumann didn't have a tenor available to sing it. Ms Scholl does a marvellous job here, and her voice never sounds stressed, not even at the top notes. Gerhild Romberger gives a good account of the alto part, in particular in the first aria, 'Von den Stricken'. I am less happy with the other aria, 'Es ist vollbracht', where she uses too much vibrato. Clemens Heidrich is excellent in the role of Christ, and Ekkehard Abele is doing well in the arias and in the role of Pilate, although the lowest notes are a little weak sometimes. There are impressive performances of the choir and the orchestra whose contributions are crucial to this interpretation of Schumann's arrangement of Bach's masterpiece.

In the chorales the sopranos are supported by twenty trebles from the Kölner Domchor - the Choir of Cologne Cathedral. This is in line with Schumann's own performance, where fifty trebles were used. This is an indication that the vocal and instrumental forces he had at his disposal were larger than those Hermann Max uses, among them a choir of just 28 singers. Maybe the sound his ensembles produce isn't that much different from the sound of Schumann's forces. His performance took place in a concert hall, whereas this recording was made in what seems to be a pretty large church. The reverberation is often a problem, but here it works in a positive way, making the ensembles - and in particular the choir - sound larger than they are.

As I have already indicated the booklet contains extensive information about Schumann's treatment of Bach's score, and about the decisions which have been taken to realise this performance. It is a shame that the trebles of the Kölner Domchor are omitted from the list of performers. There is also no indication that this recording was made during live performances. If it was taken down live this would explain some minor technical imperfections and background noises.

This recording is testimony to Robert Schumann's appreciation of Bach's St John Passion. One can only be grateful that his role in the rediscovery of Bach's sacred music has been brought to our attention with this impressive recording.

Johan van Veen

 

 


Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical

Hyperion

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
Alto
Arcodiva
Atoll
CDAccord
Cameo Classics
Centaur
Hallé
Hortus
Lyrita
Nimbus
Northern Flowers
Redcliffe
Sheva
Talent
Toccata Classics


Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing
sample
 


EXPLORE MUSICWEB INTERNATIONAL

Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews

 

Discographies
   Composer
      Composer surveys
   National
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
.
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

Interviews
With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site

Nostalgia

Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Comment
Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure

Announcements

 

Community
Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Reviewers
Pat and present

Helpers invited!

Resources
How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips


Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Publishers
Other links
Newsgroups
Web News sites etc

PotPourri
A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Questionnaire    
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Dictionary
Magazines
Newsfeed  
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools




Return to Review Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.