MusicWeb International One of the most grown-up review sites around 2024
60,000 reviews
... and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here Acte Prealable Polish CDs
 

Presto Music CD retailer
 
Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

Some items
to consider

new MWI
Current reviews

old MWI
pre-2023 reviews

paid for
advertisements

Acte Prealable Polish recordings

Forgotten Recordings
Forgotten Recordings
All Forgotten Records Reviews

TROUBADISC
Troubadisc Weinberg- TROCD01450

All Troubadisc reviews


FOGHORN Classics

Alexandra-Quartet
Brahms String Quartets

All Foghorn Reviews


All HDTT reviews


Songs to Harp from
the Old and New World


all Nimbus reviews



all tudor reviews


Follow us on Twitter


Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
   
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Contributing Editor
Ralph Moore
Webmaster
   David Barker
Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger

 

Index page

Back to Chapter 5

6

The London Philharmonic Orchestra

History 1932 until 1939 when it was obliged to go into voluntary liquidation. The orchestra reforms and is administered by the players themselves. J B Priestley, Jack Hylton, Sir Henry Wood. Life in a self-managed orchestra. 1944 Sir Thomas returns to his old orchestra. He leaves and in 1946 forms the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. 1947 the author follows.

When the war started, in 1939, every one in the London Philharmonic Orchestra felt very insecure; would the concerts and recordings already booked, or planned, take place? Some of the players were already expressing doubts as to whether the shaky financial basis upon which the orchestra was founded could possibly survive. In fact it was not long before London Philharmonic Ltd. was obliged to call the creditors to a Liquidation meeting.

The Company had been founded by Sir Thomas Beecham in 1932, with himself as Artistic Director, and with a number of well-born and wealthy music lovers as co-directors. At the meeting it was left to Sir Thomas to explain that there was no money at all, and therefore no one would get any. He used his famed eloquence and charm to impart this disagreeable information, and somehow succeeded in soothing and placating his audience. The players in the orchestra, all of whom were owed money for unpaid fees, made no opposition to the voluntary liquidation of the company; their main concern was to keep the orchestra in being.

Almost at once the musicians decided to form a new company, with themselves as shareholders. Sir Thomas gave his blessing, the company was created and named Musical Culture Limited. A Board of Directors was elected and staff engaged to administer the affairs of the orchestra. Charles Gregory, a very fine player who had been Beecham’s principal horn for some years, was elected Chairman of the Board. He was held in considerable respect, and, as I was to learn for myself a few years later, he was a man of imagination and integrity. Thomas Russell, one of the viola players, also elected to the Board, became their Secretary and Business Manager. The orchestra then set about looking for engagements.

In 1940, after undertaking a few concerts, Sir Thomas left for the USA, leaving the members of the orchestra to take full responsibility for the administration and artistic control of the newly re-formed London Philharmonic Orchestra. The full story of this remarkable achievement is contained in two books by Thomas Russell, Philharmonic and Philharmonic Decade, essential reading for anyone interested in the development of orchestral music in Britain.

Because of his stirring wartime broadcasts J.B.Priestley, the famous author of The Good Companions and of many successful novels and plays, had become a household name. After a chance meeting with Tom Russell he became concerned about the difficulties the orchestra was facing and decided that something needed to be done to rally support for it. He suggested that a concert be put on that would attract a prestigious audience, and which could be used to generate funds from the general public. It should be called ‘A Musical Manifesto’. Sir Adrian Boult, Basil Cameron and Dr Malcolm Sargent (he did not become Sir Malcolm until 1947) readily agreed to conduct one item each, and Eileen Joyce was willing to play the Grieg Piano Concerto.

Click for larger picture

On the night of the 8th of July 1940, the Queen’s Hall was full, which was unusual at that early stage of the war, before everyone had become accustomed to the blackout. The programme for this auspicious occasion was: Elgar’s Cockaigne Overture, conducted by Sir Adrian Boult, Eileen Joyce played the Grieg Piano Concerto, with Basil Cameron conducting and, after the interval, Dr Sargent conducted the Second Symphony by Sibelius. The concert started with Priestley making one of his most effective speeches, a mixture of homespun philosophy and good Yorkshire hard-nosed practicality; this was his Musical Manifesto. It was well received by the capacity audience, and widely reported by the press. In the next few weeks thousands of donations were received, ranging from postal orders for a few shillings to very substantial cheques. This was the turning point for the orchestra, putting it (for the time being) in a relatively strong financial position.

Priestley’s speech and part of the performance of Cockaigne Overture are re-enacted in a film the orchestra made in 1941, called Battle for Music. It was quite widely shown at the time and is still occasionally shown on TV. The film tells of the trials and tribulations the LPO and the members of the orchestra experienced in the early years of the war and how they triumphed in the face of adversity. Some of the musicians, in particular members of the Board, ‘act’ their role in this story with varying degrees of success. As well as Priestley, Dr. Malcolm Sargent, Sir Adrian Boult and Jack Hylton also have ‘acting’ roles.

Battle for Music is not up to Hollywood standards, but it fulfilled its purpose at the time and remains an interesting and entertaining historical document. Such shortcomings as it has are outweighed by the honesty of its intent and the excellence of the performances of the music, conducted by Dr. Sargent, Constant Lambert, and Warwick Braithwaite, with Eileen Joyce and Moiseiwitsch as soloists.

The film ends on a high note. Superimposed over newsreel footage of Sir Winston Churchill inspecting the troops, to the accompaniment of Land of Hope and Glory, are the following words:

An Orchestra is like a country. It has its triumphs, its disasters and despairs. Only with unity and faith can it become great.

The London Philharmonic Orchestra has these qualities. These musicians played on during the darkest days and blazed the trail for other fine orchestras.

They showed how musicians themselves can organise their own lives and their own art. This spirit, which inspired this orchestra to struggle against adversity, to adapt their lives courageously to changing conditions, cannot be defeated.

The London Philharmonic becomes the treasured possession of the British people.

Further support for the orchestra came from a most surprising quarter. Jack Hylton, formerly a famous dance-band leader, was now an impresario, with interests in the theatre world. He undertook to present the LPO for a week at a time in a number of large theatres all over the country. These theatres usually presented either Music Hall (later to be known as Variety), or companies touring successful musical comedies, following their West End run.

Hylton saw to it that the concerts were well advertised, and took especial care over the presentation of the orchestra. He had a rostrum built, that could be assembled in every theatre the orchestra visited, with sides and a ceiling, so that all the sound did not get lost up in the ‘flies’, making it much better acoustically than orchestral performances on theatre stages usually are. The whole presentation was rather more attractive than in many of the conventional venues in which concerts were given.

Each week there was a concert every evening and one on Wednesday and Saturday afternoons as well. These concerts were extremely successful, playing to full houses virtually the whole time. A great many of those attending the concerts had never seen or heard a full symphony orchestra before. Their enthusiasm for this new experience was heart-warming.

When I had accepted Mr Haines’s offer of a three weeks’ engagement with the LPO I had no idea of what I was letting myself in for. Perhaps this was fortunate; fools rush in where angels fear to tread.

My first engagement with the LPO was at the Royal Albert Hall on Sunday, the 9th of May 1943. There was a rehearsal at 10.00, and a concert at 2.30. George Weldon (I had played for him before in the Wessex) conducted a mainly Tchaikovsky programme that included the ever popular 1st Piano Concerto, and the Theme and Variations from the Suite in G.

Within the first few minutes I realised that this was something very different to anything I had experienced before. The quality of the string tone was much better, and the range of dynamics throughout the orchestra far greater – ppp really did mean very softly, and because of the number of string players and the volume of tone they produced, fff was very, very loud. To be playing in the Royal Albert Hall! I had only been there previously to attend Prom concerts when I was still a student, and now to be in this exalted company! The few important solo passages went reasonably well, so I left at the end of the concert on quite a ‘high’.

Click for larger picture

Early on Monday morning we set off for what for me was to be the first of three of these ‘Hylton’ weeks. We travelled to Norwich by train; in the afternoon there was a rehearsal and at 7.30 a concert. This was followed by seven more concerts that week, each with a different programme. With that number of concerts there was not time for even one rehearsal for each performance, but as the orchestra had played the works many times, in most cases with these same conductors, and as they were very good players anyway, the results were quite satisfactory. For me the situation was rather different; all but a handful of the pieces we played were unknown to me.

Those pieces that were rehearsed were usually just ‘topped and tailed’, and only the tricky passages played through, giving a novice, such as I was, only a rough idea of the whole work. If one does not know the music and the conductor’s beat is at all unclear (by no means an infrequent event), it can be difficult to know whether they are beating two or four beats to the bar; or know what they are doing at the end of a pause, or at a ‘cut-off’, when there is a sudden silence in the music. It is all too easy to find that you are the only one left playing when everyone else has stopped, or, worse still, you have come in loudly all on your own – that, for some strange reason, is called a ‘domino’. This can be amusing to one’s colleagues, especially if it is a particularly high or low note, or results in a terrible strangulated sound, as the player seeks to suppress the unwanted intrusion. It is never anything but the source of acute embarrassment to the player. The pieces that went unrehearsed I had to sight-read at the concert. Skating on thin ice is a less hazardous undertaking! Dazed and exhausted I got to the end of the week, the adrenaline pumping hard.

On Saturday evening, after the second concert that day, we returned to London, arriving back in the early hours of the morning. Sunday morning dawned much too early for me; at 10.00 we were rehearsing again in the Royal Albert Hall (RAH) for the concert that afternoon.

Click for larger picture

Monday morning found us on the train again, this time bound for Northampton, where we had another week with eight concerts. I found the second week a little easier; I had played a good deal of the music once. But occasionally overconfidence and tiredness led to mistakes; I also had more time to contemplate how much I needed to learn, if I was to match the accomplishment of my colleagues. At the end of the week, back to London again arriving late on Saturday night with only a few hours before another rehearsal and concert in the RAH – and more new

Click for larger picture
music to learn. Then, early on Monday morning we were off again, this time to Newcastle for a repeat of the previous two weeks. I now started to worry whether I would be offered any more work with the orchestra, or if this would prove to be just a flash in the pan. I didn’t feel too confident about what I was doing, but at least I now knew what page I was on – most of the time.

On Friday, as I was leaving the stage at the end of the concert, Charlie Gregory, the Chairman of the Orchestra, stopped me, and said, ‘Can you spare a moment? I’d like to have a word with you.’ My heart sank and, as usual, I feared the worst. ‘They’ve had enough’, I thought. When I heard Gregory say ‘How would you like to join the orchestra, as our second clarinet?’ the gates of Heaven opened, and I heard the sound of the Great Trumpets! ‘Oh! Yes, that would be wonderful! Thank you.’ That was one of the best moments of my life. I could hardly believe my ears, or really take in the tremendous opportunity I was being given.

As usual we returned to London on Saturday evening. On Sunday, 30th May 1943, we had another concert in the RAH. It was also my eighteenth birthday, and I was in luck – it was a very special concert –

Click for larger picture
Sir Henry Wood conducted, and the soloist was the very fine pianist, Solomon, a truly great artist. This was the first time I played for Sir Henry, though I had heard my father speak about him many times. In fact I always felt that my father was rather pleased with his impersonation he liked to give of Sir Henry. Since my father retained his Russian accent all his life even though he came to Britain as a young boy, and Sir Henry spoke with a slightly Edwardian/Cockney accent, the impression he gave of Sir Henry was none too accurate.

Sir Henry belonged to the ‘no-nonsense’ school of conducting. There was nothing flamboyant, or showy, about his style. He used a longish, rather thick baton, and gave a good clear beat. He concentrated on getting a precise performance with firm rhythm, clean attack and ensemble, and good orchestral discipline. His performances did not enthral you, but pleased with their honesty and straightforward musicality. ‘Timber’, as he was known affectionately in the profession, had a passion for establishing good habits. He used to stand at the entrance to the platform at the Queen’s Hall, with a tuning fork, which he struck as each player went past him. The musician would then play his ‘A’ (the note the whole orchestra tunes to, usually sounded by the oboe). I am told that he was never heard to say ‘flat’, but that quite frequently he would say, in his rather nasal voice, ‘shaaarp!’

He believed that a three hour rehearsal should last three hours – there was no attempt to get the goodwill of the orchestra by finishing early, a device employed by some conductors. He had a very large watch, which he used to put on his music stand. If he had completed the music to be rehearsed by ten minutes to one, he would start at a place that allowed him to continue until one o’clock. Keeping a careful eye on his watch, he would stop exactly at one o’clock, whether this made good sense musically or not.

He also liked his musicians to mark in their music any instructions he gave them. My father had a congenital dislike for writing anything in the part that would remind him, or anyone else using that part in the future, of any changes, additions or corrections that had been made, preferring to rely on his memory. Noting a lack of activity, when my father should have been busily inserting some instruction, Sir Henry said, ‘Mr Tschaikov! Remember! – a bad pencil is better than a good memory’.

That concert on my 18th birthday, conducted by Sir Henry Wood, was the beginning of the most exciting and important period of my life. At that age with my background I might have expected to go to university, except that I had not acquired the academic qualifications required, or

Click for larger picture
the desire to acquire them. Instead, between 1943 and 1947 the LPO served as my university. Here I not only received a wonderful musical education playing for some of the finest conductors from the pre-1939 war years, alongside first-class musicians, but also a schooling that provided a unique foundation course in living, for which I have been grateful all my life.

In May 1945, at the cessation of hostilities in Europe, there were still only three London orchestras: the London Symphony, the London Philharmonic, and the BBC Symphony Orchestras. The BBC Symphony Orchestra did not return to London until September 1945 and the London Symphony Orchestra was at a rather low ebb, financially and artistically. The LPO with its dynamic and imaginative management was able to take the lead in bringing back to London’s musical life the international element that had been missing during the war years. Tom Russell, with admirable foresight, had already booked some outstanding conductors and soloists prior to the end of the war. We were off to a flying start and for the next few years a number of very fine artists who had not played in Britain since before the war were engaged by the LPO.

For a very young musician, such as I was then, the opportunity to work and associate with musicians like Sir Thomas Beecham, Bruno Walter, Eduard van Beinum, Victor de Sabata, Jaques Thibaud, Heifetz, Francescatti, Fournier, Gendron – the list is endless – was incredible.

Playing in the LPO as well as being extremely enjoyable and rewarding musically was for me a profoundly enriching learning experience. The structure of the LPO at that time led to everyone being involved to a far greater extent than is normal. Nearly everyone took part in the quite frequent orchestral meetings at which important decisions on what course of action the orchestra should take were discussed. Naturally, the members of an orchestra will come from a great variety of backgrounds, educationally, socially and economically and hold very different political views.

Age plays little part in the position that a musician may hold within his section so that an outstanding and exciting young violinist may become the Leader of the orchestra when he or she is still only in their early or mid-twenties, whilst players sitting at the rear of the section may have had thirty or more years experience. The principal flautist, who has played with the finest conductors for a lifetime, may be sitting next to a brilliant young principal oboist just out of Conservatoire. While this is always accepted as far as musical ability is concerned, when it came to the discussions at meetings the ‘young’ and the ‘old’ – roughly those over and under forty – opposed each other fairly regularly. It was rather more serious when there was a difference of opinion between those with very strongly held but opposing political points of view. On these occasions age would play no part. The older and younger players would join together in line with their political convictions.

This greater involvement in the affairs and running of the orchestra revealed all these differences of background, age and opinion quite starkly and increased the stress, frustration and the highs and lows that are a normal part of a musician’s life. As a result the virtues and failings in one’s own character, and those of ones colleagues, could be on display for all to see. The pull of personal ambition versus responsibility to the group, the courage to take an unpopular stand, and not run for cover when a decision one had supported turned out to have been mistaken, had to be faced.

I saw all those qualities and faults of character that I was to meet throughout my life, and see at first hand the effect virtues and vices had on our communal life. One witnessed courage and determination contrasted with cowardice, duplicity and betrayal; tolerance, kindness and sensitivity, as well as bigotry and a brutal disregard for the feelings of others. Sometimes hard decisions had to be made. Loyalty and friendship were tested. One did not always come up to the mark in one’s own estimation, and, worse still, one failed the test of the good opinion of one’s fellows.

Feelings can run pretty high in an orchestra and sometimes lead to bitter disputes between colleagues so that players obliged to sit next to one another within a section may not be on speaking terms for a while – possibly for years. Yet, even when dislike is so great that messages or instructions have to be passed through a third party, musicians will play together with a sweetness and unanimity that suggests that they are lovers.

For most of the 1940s the LPO was generally thought of as a ‘left-wing’ orchestra, largely because its members had elected Thomas Russell and Charles Gregory, both Communists, to the Board of Directors. With Tom Russell as the Business Manager (later General Manager) and Charlie Gregory as Chairman of the Board of Directors, their influence was indeed considerable.

As a very young man I was attracted by the idealism and intellectual vigour of both these men, especially Gregory, and also by other Communists in the orchestra, who were fine players and set an example I wanted to emulate.

In view of the immense changes that have taken place in Eastern Europe it is worth recalling that this was wartime, and that the Soviet Union was our ally. Uncle Joe, the now despised and rejected Joseph Stalin, was a popular figure. Throughout the world, and especially in Europe and the USA, a considerable number of the most outstanding creative and performing artists had joined the Communist Party. In 1944 I did so too. But following a ‘party line’ of any kind is not something for which I think I am suited and I proved to be a difficult, recalcitrant and rather short lived member.

It is not surprising that the LPO was not too popular with the old-guard arts hierarchy. Perhaps, even more than the spectre of a ‘red’ orchestra in its midst, the knowledge that the members of the orchestra alone were responsible for its management decisions and successful artistic policy sent shivers down the spine of those who felt that musicians who play instruments should stick to doing just that, and leave management and artistic decisions to their betters (who don’t dirty their hands with violas, trumpets, or the like). Sadly, this same attitude can still be heard today from some of the backwoodsmen amongst our critics and administrators.

Tom Russell had both flair and insight; and he had the energy and drive to achieve his objectives. As an administrator he lacked the patience for the humdrum chores of everyday office routine; he was more concerned with ideas, and when those around him in the office did not check carefully there could be quite serious mistakes. I have always found it ironic that the LPO dismissed Russell, many years later, not for any mistakes he had made or any lack of ability, but because he went to China for his holiday! But this did not stop the Orchestra from taking advantage of Russell’s visit, and the contacts he had made. They were the first British orchestra to tour China.

Towards the end of 1944, several weeks before the Annual General Meeting I received the notice and the audited accounts. It was the first time I had ever seen accounts and so they were a complete mystery to me. I assumed that everyone else would understand them, so I decided to take professional advice. I phoned the chap who looked after my income tax returns (my only contact with the world of finance) and he agreed to have a look at the accounts with me. Like many accountants he was a serious man, and as he examined the LPO accounts his face assumed an even more serious expression. It seems that there were a number of entries that in his view required questioning. His advice was that I should not under any circumstances agree to the accounts before I had received satisfactory answers to the questions he told me I should ask.

I expected that at the AGM the older and more experienced members of the orchestra would be leaping to their feet and peppering Tom Russell with questions about the balance sheet. But there wasn’t a murmur from anyone. Always willing to rush in when caution might be wiser, I thought I might as well put in my pennyworth. I stood up and asked a couple of questions. Consternation! Mr Haines, the Assistant Secretary, was dispatched to seek further information. On his return one or two more searching questions caused increasing discomposure, until, after his third attempt to find evidence to silence this unwanted flow of questions, Tom Russell decided to throw himself on the mercy of the meeting. It seems there was really nothing to worry about; the cause of the apparent inconsistencies was a move by the accounts department from the basement to the second floor. In the process one or two of the books had been mislaid, nonetheless he could assure the meeting there was absolutely nothing to worry about. After a short discussion he asked for a vote of confidence, which he received, though not without some dissent. The democratic process has always appealed to me as the cut and thrust of debate is natural to my temperament. The LPO provided the ideal environment in which it could flourish.

Though the orchestra’s artistic policy was splendid, inattention to detail had led to a decline in our financial position. On a previous occasion, before I joined the orchestra, the players had had to make sacrifices to keep the orchestra afloat. It looked as if this might occur again. At one meeting this question was the subject of considerable concern. Various solutions were put forward: we should play programmes that did not require the engagement of costly extra players, especially when we played in smaller halls on tour; we should engage conductors whose fees were relatively modest. These suggestions so infuriated one of the members that he stood up and declaimed in a very loud voice, his face red with indignation, ‘We must never make artistic concessions. We should take Maestro de Sabata to every fishing village in Britain.’ This piece of high-flown rhetoric referred to the remarkable Italian conductor, Victor de Sabata, who conducted the orchestra frequently at that time. Unfortunately Maestro de Sabata liked programmes that included works for a large orchestra, requiring additional wind and percussion players and extra rehearsals, making his visits extremely costly.

This suggestion seemed so absurd to me that I felt it was time to put forward a solution. Tom Russell had a fairly large staff, some thought too large, and had attracted a number of interesting, valuable and worthy people around him. Each time I went to the LPO offices in Welbeck Street it seemed that their number had grown. With tongue firmly in cheek I said, ‘I think I have the answer to our difficulties.’ All heads turned towards me. ‘Why don’t we increase the office staff to forty, and send a trio on tour? That way we could balance the books!’ My suggestion met with a variety of responses. Some of my colleagues smiled, a few laughed; others looked incredulous; several appeared to be about to have an apoplectic fit. I learnt that it is dangerous, when one is young, to address one’s elders and betters in this way. My performance in the orchestra was listened to with increasingly critical ears. And fault was found – because, of course, fault there was. But I weathered the storm, and remained unrepentant.

When, in 1944 Sir Thomas Beecham returned to his old orchestra he found that it was now managing itself very successfully. After a year or

Click for larger picture
so his need to be able to be in charge of everything to do with the orchestra made it increasingly difficult for him to work together with the orchestra’s elected management. Reluctantly the orchestra and Sir Thomas parted company. By 1946 he had formed the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra (RPO) and in 1947 I left the LPO and started playing in his new orchestra.

This was a step into a very different environment. Now I was not one of a group of musicians making decisions about their own future. In the RPO I no longer had any part in the management. However, there were benefits: I was paid considerably more, I was playing in an even better orchestra with some of the most outstanding woodwind players at that time. And above all I would be playing a great deal of the time with one of the greatest conductors. The following years were to be probably the happiest of my musical life

Chapter 7

 


 



Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and keep us afloat

 

New Releases

Naxos Classical
All Naxos reviews

Chandos recordings
All Chandos reviews

Hyperion recordings
All Hyperion reviews

Foghorn recordings
All Foghorn reviews

Troubadisc recordings
All Troubadisc reviews



all Bridge reviews


all cpo reviews

Divine Art recordings
Click to see New Releases
Get 10% off using code musicweb10
All Divine Art reviews


All Eloquence reviews

Lyrita recordings
All Lyrita Reviews

 

Wyastone New Releases
Obtain 10% discount

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing