Site
Map
More
Reviews
How
to find a review
Classical CD Review Archive
Book
Reviews
Film
Music Reviews
Jazz
CD Reviews
Nostalgia
Comment
Norman
Lebrecht Weekly
Arthur
Butterworth Writes
Phil
Scowcroft's Garlands
Classical
blogs
Reviewers
Logs
Announcements
Don't
Go Here!
Community
Bulletin
Board
Web
Ring
Reviewers
Helpers
invited!
Resources
Quiz
British
Composers
British
Light Music Composers
Other
composers
Indexes
Label
Masterwork
Discographies
On-line
Music
[Download sites]
Themed
Review pages
Our
Classic Classics
Online
books
MWI
Classical
Encyclopaedia
Gilder
Dictionary of
Composers
MWI
Pop
Encyclopedia
Other
Complete
Books
Programme
Notes
British
Music Society
Performers
The
BBC Proms
Musical
WWW pages
Classical
Music Online
Recording
Companies and Retailers
Agents
and Marketing
Publishers
Non-Classical
Web pages
Orchestra
Web Sites
Newsgroups
Web
News sites etc
Editorial
Board
Classical Editor
Rob Barnett
Seen & Heard
Editor and Webmaster
Bill Kenny
MusicWeb Webmaster
Len Mullenger
Assistant Webmasters
Patrick Waller
David Barker
PotPourri
A
pot-pourri of articles
MW
Listening Room
MW
Office
Helping
MusicWeb
Advice
to Windows Vista users
Questionnaire
Site
History
What
they say about us
What
we say about us!
Where
to get help on the Internet
CD
orders By Special Request
Graphics
archive
Currency
Converter
Dictionary
Magazines
Newsfeed
Web Ring
Translation Service
Rules
for potential reviewers :-)
Do
Not Go Here!
April Fools
|
 |
 |
At
this date all recorded tablets were
being processed at the Hanover plant,
which would have had uniform fonts and
quoins for embossing the trademark and
the company designation, as well as
the catalog number. When seen on the
actual discs, all corresponding embossed
entries are identical in size. The handwritten
matrix number 1657 of the London
recording is seen clearly to the right
of the spindle hole, and the catalog
number 661 is seen at 2 o’clock.
Both discs show the recording date,
the London pressing somewhat to the
left of the spindle hole and the Paris
pressing rather indistinctly at 10 o’clock.
Although Fred Gaisberg undoubtedly cut
both recordings, note the difference
in the handwritings. There seems to
be little doubt that he frequently had
an assistant who made the actual entries
on the recorded tablets, as noted elsewhere
by Peter Adamson. The Recording Angel
trademark is seen on the obverses of
both discs but is absence from both
reverses, which have the phrase REPRODUCED
IN HANOVER.
The
disc below is from Darby’s suffix-A
series, recorded in November 1900 during
his second European tour which began
in December 1899 in Copenhagen. The
matrix number can be seen clearly to
the right of the spindle hole. The disc
on the right was recorded in Berlin
almost a year later. The
phrase REPRODUCED
IN HANOVER is
discernible on the reverse, although
there is no Angel trademark. Note the
unusual position of the Angel trademark.
At least two different sizes of Angel
trademarks have been observed. Both
figures show raised catalog numbers,
indicating that these were entered by
embossing them onto the original stampers.
We
are fortunate in that Fred Gaisberg's
personal diaries survived and that significant
portions were reprinted by Ernie Bayly
in his magazine The Talking Machine
Review, beginning in No. 53, on
page 1381. The diaries confirm that
the dates appearing on records made
on this tour are indeed actual recording
dates.
|
|
|
|
Berliner
62535, matrix 2375A
|
Berliner
48471, matrix 1306
|
|
November
1900
|
October
1901
|
The
diameter of the central area of Berliner
discs varied with the length of the
recording - the longer the recording,
the smaller the central area. The diameters
of the central areas shown above vary
from 81 mm to 110 mm. The placement
of the Recording Angel trademark above
the Berliner name on the Berliner 32907
disc seems to have been made because
of the smaller diameter of the central
area. Once moved to that position, it
appears to have remained there until
paper labels were introduced in July
1901.
|
|
|
|
Berliner
40648, matrix 659A
|
Berliner
152, matrix 2361
|
|
Berlin,
February 1900
|
March
11, 1901
|
The
disc on the left above was recorded
by Sinkler Darby in Berlin on his second
foreign tour. That on the right was
recorded in London by Fred Gaisberg.
Note the two different company designs.
|
|
|
|
Berliner
57X, London May 16, 1901
|
The
disc above shows a complete Recording
Angel trademark on the reverse, which
is seen on Berliner discs as early as
March 1901. There is a discrepancy between
the matrix number 2785, listed
in Kelly’s catalog, and that seen to
the right of the spindle hole, apparently
ending in ─
─ 95.
|
|
|
|
Berliner
12026, matrix 1982A
|
Berliner
39169, matrix 1033B
|
|
Bucarest,
July 1900
|
Brussels,
September 1901
|
The
disc on the left above, Berliner 12026,
was recorded by Sinkler Darby in Bucarest
in July 1900; the matrix number 1982A
is seen clearly to the right of the
spindle hole. The label on the right
above, Berliner 39169, was recorded
by Darby in Brussels in September 1901.
Note that the matrix suffix is B,
indicating that the recording was made
by the all-wax method. All information
in the central area was embossed at
the pressing plant, with the exception
of the matrix number, 1033, which
is partially worn away from wear. As
late as November 1901 the reverse was
blank, except for the phrase REPRODUCED
IN HANOVER.
Some
five months later the Recording Angel
trademark shown below began to appear
on the reverse of all Gramophone Company
discs. In November 1901 all Gramophone
Company discs were issued with paper
labels, and the 7-inch discs that were
formerly called Berliners became Gramophone
Company records.
The
Berliner 38037, matrix 3827,
shown below, was made in Paris during
Fred Gaisberg’s summer tour in Paris
in August/September 1901. All writing
is raised, including the company designation,
the Angel trademark, the catalog number,
the selection, the performers, and the
location. The serial number is incised
to the right of the spindle hole. The
reverse is blank, except for the phrase
REPRODUCED IN HANOVER.
One
notes that as late as May 1901 the selection
title, performer, and probably recording
date, as well as the matrix number,
were still being inscribed by the recording
engineer or his assistant.
The
earliest known ten-inch Berliner G.C.-7942,
shown below, was recorded by Fred Gaisberg
in London in April 1901. All information
is embossed in raised letters, and the
Angel trademark is on the reverse. The
amazing neatness, and the absence of
any matrix number, is quite striking.
The matrix number is 121, and is the
second known 10-inch recording by J.
Jacobs, whose name was entered incorrectly
on the above disc. A second 10-inch
Berliner was identified in The Hillandale
News, Number 150, June 1986, as
G.C.-24040, recorded by R.M. Raisova
and N. G. Seversky in St. Petersburg
in June, 1901.
The
latest 10-inch Berliner known to me
is Berliner 22519, recorded in Moscow
in late June, 1901 by Leonid Sobinov,
as shown below. The handwritten matrix
number 263-nB-15 can be seen
quite clearly to the right of the spindle
hole. All other data in the central
area are embossed and raised. These
observations confirm the conclusions
of Edge and Petts, as outlined below,
that the only markings made on the original
wax recording tablet was the matrix
number.
To
summarize the various changes in the
design and format of the central area
of Berliner issues from August 8, 1898
through September 1901, the company
designation, catalog number, matrix
number and recording date were engraved
or embossed into the wax-coated zinc
plate from the beginning up to the introduction
of the all-wax recording tablet, as
was the recording Angel trademark except
for the "original" series.
From as early as July 1899 the catalog
number appears raised, and was embossed
into the original shell. Beginning in
July 1900 the company designation and
the Angel trademark were also raised,
while the date was engraved at the time
of the recording throughout the entire
period. Following the introduction of
the 10-inch recording, the selection,
title, performer, and location appear
raised. From about February 1899 to
August 1900 the Angel trademark was
embossed on the zinc plate to the left
of the spindle hole, after which time
it was placed above the company designation,
and then moved back again around March
1901. In August and November 1900 the
lower half of the company designation
appears in a single line, as seen above
in the last figure below.

The
company designation above was the first
one to be used by the Gramophone Company.
The words PATENTIRT____ BREVETS
are German and French for Patents.
 |
|
| August/September
1898 |
February
1899 |

The
company logo occupying the upper portion
of the central area first used in the
"original" series, shown on
the left above, was changed as early
as February 1899. The first logo shows
the E. BERLINER’S 32 mm in length,
while the word GRAMOPHONE was
59 mm. This design was also used in
July 1900. During the "unlettered"
series the former remained the same
size, but the latter was reduced in
font size and overall length, the latter
to 35 mm, as shown above. Several other
variants are known, including the three-line
variant shown above in the logo from
Berliner 32907 of August 24, 1900.

|
March-June
1901
|
September
1901
|
By March 1901 the compact format of
1899 had been restored, although in
several different sizes. That on the
left is 27 mm for GRAMOPHONE,
while that on the right is 36 mm.
|
|
Advertising
Rates
Visitor
stats
MusicWeb
International
has over 21,000 Classical CD reviews on offer
Gerard
Hoffnung Concerts &
The
Bricklayer Story
New
Releases

New
Releases


23rd-27th
May

MusicWeb
sells the Polish
catalogue CDAccord
£10.50 post free W-W

MusicWeb sells the
Arcodiva catalogue
£12.00 post free W-W

Price
Reduction: £11.75
post-free
Bull
Horn
Price
comparison Website
MusicWeb
can now offer you discs from the following catalogues:
Prices include postage
MusicWeb
Recommended Recordings 2007
DISCS
OF THE YEAR 2007
|