Letters from a Life: The Selected Letters of BENJAMIN BRITTEN 
                  1913–1976. Volume Five: 1958–1965, ed. Philip Reed and Mervyn 
                  Cooke. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press 2010. 1764 pp., illustrations. 
                  
                    
                  The rate of issue of this edition of Britten’s letters has gained 
                  speed since the first two volumes were published in 1991. That’s 
                  certainly a positive trend since the project was (after volume 
                  3) taken over by Boydells. Philip Reed has been involved from 
                  the very beginning, and even after nearly twenty years the editorial 
                  principles and outlook of the books has been retained. 
                    
                  This generously-illustrated, sumptuously annotated series gives 
                  deep insights into Britten’s life and milieu. In this volume 
                  we witness Britten encouraging young and aspiring composers: 
                  Maxwell Davies, Bennett, Maw, Birtwistle, Williamson amongst 
                  many others. Britten had at this stage reached the peak of his 
                  career, with the composition of, amongst other works, the two 
                  cantatas, the Cello Sonata, Noye’s Fludde, Nocturne, 
                  and A Midsummer Night’s Dream. We should not forget the 
                  War Requiem which met with wide international acclaim. 
                  
                    
                  The extent of Britten’s celebrity can be glimpsed in that Britten 
                  and Pears once dined with no less a figure than Luigi Nono and 
                  his wife in Venice. We wonder, in Britten’s letter to Nono of 
                  1 October 1962, what the following sentence means: “Thank you 
                  very much for your note, & for the money.” A typical case 
                  where one would long for a commentary. There are more such instances 
                  in the entire series. Why, for example, are so many contemporaneous 
                  English composers entirely absent. It is interesting to see 
                  which musicians have hardly ever featured in the five volumes 
                  to date. What happened to Edmund Rubbra, Herbert Howells or 
                  Alan Bush - although Bush did write a song-cycle for Pears in 
                  1953. 
                    
                  Naturally it is Britten’s cosmos that we experience and 
                  that affords only an incomplete vista of the actual British 
                  musical scene. This may be something a German editor would comment 
                  upon, but would it be relevant to an edition of Britten letters? 
                  I think it would, since Britten, as an outstanding figure of 
                  the British musical life in the Twentieth century - we experience 
                  him deeply involved in organising performances and performing 
                  himself - takes a very particular outlook at others, and hence 
                  influenced generations both of listeners and musicians. 
                    
                  Though naturally sympathetic towards Britten minor behavioural 
                  flaws are not neglected. His tirade against Lord Harewood after 
                  the break-up of his marriage (p. 631) is bitter indeed. Still, 
                  one thing becomes clear about which I have always wondered when 
                  reading the previous four volumes. There are more Britten letters 
                  than those included in these volumes. We are not told what the 
                  criteria were for their inclusion or exclusion nor is there 
                  given any information about there location, whether they are 
                  in the Britten-Pears Library or elsewhere. This means, a checking 
                  of sources is impossible. Now everybody ever having worked with 
                  original sources knows that there can easily be misspellings 
                  or misreadings, and although this is rather improbable with 
                  respect to the editors’ authority, such things can happen. Also 
                  does one wander whether there have been omissions either through 
                  the choice of letters or, in single letters, for other reasons 
                  (e.g. in Britten’s letter to E.M. Forster, 21 April 1962, p. 
                  393). 
                    
                  In total however, we have a most inspiring and inspired publication, 
                  with plenty new insights into Britten and his world. Departing 
                  from this edition, and together with the multitude of other 
                  important Britten publications over the past few years, we have 
                  a much more substantial basis for future Britten research, and 
                  for the understanding of Britten and his music. 
                    
                  Jürgen Schaarwächter