The adjective most 
                likely to be brought to mind by Lilya 
                Zilberstein’s Rachmaninov playing is 
                "lovely". Not that it lacks 
                power. In the last piece the chords 
                ring out imperiously against a whirlwind 
                of figuration, yet the chords are always 
                rounded in tone, the figuration never 
                obtrusive. Paradoxically, your jaw may 
                be made to drop more easily by players 
                who are making heavier weather of it 
                all. She is also always ready to relax 
                whenever a new harmonic vista allows. 
              
 
              
The same thing may 
                be said of the whole cycle. Textures 
                are clear but full, the melodies and 
                counter-melodies arch gracefully around 
                each other, there is a natural sense 
                of give and take to the rubato. These 
                are very musical moments indeed. 
              
 
              
And yet, if you go 
                to Rachmaninov himself in no.2 – the 
                only one of the set he recorded – you 
                realize there is more to be found in 
                the music. Zilberstein’s melodies soar 
                proudly above the sea of arpeggios, 
                but with Rachmaninov the arpeggios take 
                on a life of their own, almost as if 
                someone else is playing them. He is 
                just that little bit tauter in his definition 
                of the structure. 
              
 
              
Still, if we are going 
                to reject all performances that are 
                on a lower level than those Rachmaninov 
                gave or might have given that won’t 
                leave us with much and I can’t imagine 
                anyone being disappointed with these 
                performances. It is, I repeat, lovely 
                playing. 
              
 
              
Likewise in the Mussorgsky, 
                while Zilberstein certainly doesn’t 
                lack panache or grandeur – there’s a 
                scintillating explosion in the link 
                between Limoges and Catacombae 
                – the parts that remain in the mind 
                are the softer ones. I tend to groan 
                with anticipated boredom when anybody 
                starts Il Vecchio Castello as 
                slowly as she does, yet she creates 
                an atmosphere of inconsolable heaviness 
                of heart that captured and held me. 
                Catacombae and Con Mortuis 
                are probingly and atmospherically played. 
                Several of the intermediate Promenades 
                are notable for their sense of poetic 
                reflection and Gnomus has mystery 
                and shadow as well as grotesquery. The 
                Tuileries and the Ballet of 
                the Unhatched Chicks, on the other 
                hand, are delightful. This isn’t always 
                the most hard-hitting Pictures 
                but it must be one of the most attractive. 
                By contrast, a version purporting to 
                be by Joyce Hatto is plainer but also 
                tougher, at times more vivid, and will 
                make a genuine alternative when identified. 
                In the last resort neither knocks you 
                for six like Richter. 
              
 
              
Ah, the "Hatto"! 
                I confess I asked to review this disc 
                following a tip-off. In my article on 
                Hatto, "Some thoughts, some questions 
                and a lot of letters", I pointed 
                out that the "Hatto" Pictures 
                has an unmarked, but magical, piano 
                at b.21 of Bydlo where the melody 
                suddenly goes up high, and I invited 
                readers to tell me of any other recordings 
                which do this. Nobody answered directly, 
                but a newsgroup discussion drew attention 
                to the fact that Zilberstein makes this 
                piano. And indeed she does, but 
                there are countless other differences 
                of tempo, rubato and dynamics. Besides, 
                if the two performances had matched 
                it would have opened up a new chapter 
                in the scandal, for the Zilberstein 
                came out a year after "Hatto"! 
                I note that the Zilberstein uses the 
                Wiener Urtext Edition. I haven’t seen 
                this, but if it has a piano at 
                this point then there may be quite a 
                few recordings that follow it. All the 
                same, the majority probably use the 
                Pavel Lamm edition, which is also supposed 
                to be Urtext, so I appeal again to readers 
                to help assemble a list of recordings 
                which have this sudden piano 
                in Bydlo. One of them will have 
                to be the "Hatto". Incidentally, 
                a performance of the Rachmaninov op.16 
                pieces by "Hatto" was described 
                as "truly great" by Bryce 
                Morrison as recently as the February 
                Gramophone. This was a "Hatto" 
                I never got, but I should say the present 
                disc is too recent to be its source. 
              
 
              
My apologies to Lilya 
                Zilberstein for dragging Hatto into 
                this review, but at least I can assure 
                her that her Mussorgsky has not been 
                pillaged. And recommend her excellent 
                disc. It is also finely recorded. Though 
                the location is not given this is a 
                co-production with Sudwestrundfunk, 
                Stuttgart, so presumably their studios 
                were used. Many collectors will want 
                this for the relatively rare Rachmaninov 
                but they will, I am sure, be glad to 
                have the Mussorgsky too. 
              
 
              
Christopher Howell