Alonso LOBO (1555-1617) Missa ‘Simile est Regnum Caelorum’ [24:03] Missa ‘Petre ego pro te rogavi’ [20:36] Vivo ego, dicit Dominus [3:00] Francisco GUERRERO (1528-1599) Simile est Regnum Caelorum [4:17] Petre ego pro te rogavi [3:57]
(Eva Juárez (soprano); Pilar Moral (soprano)
(Agnus Dei, Missa ‘Simile est Regnum Caelorum’;
Sanctus and Agnus Dei, Missa Petre ego pro te rogav’);
Marta Infante (contralto); Miguel Bernal (tenor); Luis
Vicente (bass) (‘Agnus Dei’, ‘Missa ‘Simile est Regnum
Caelorum’’); Héctor Guerrero (bass)); María Crisol
(bassoon); Raúl Mallavibarrena
rec. July, 2006, Santo Domingo de Guzmán, Benalauría (Málaga). DDD ENCHIRIADIS
EN 2016 [52:56]
Francisco Guerrero was Alonso Lobo’s
musical inspiration, and his teacher from the age of eleven.
He was revered by
him and exercised a strong influence on the latter’s style
and musical aspirations. This CD features two masses by Lobo,
who was a native of Seville. Each is based on a motet by
Guerrero - both are performed here. It was most likely Guerrero’s
post of choirmaster that Lobo took over in 1591.
Guerrero’s motets were published in 1570 (‘Simile est’)
and 1589 (‘Petre ego’). Lobo’s masses following in 1597 -
around the time that Lobo was moving permanently back to
Seville from Toledo. By then his fame had spread throughout
Spain and beyond.
The masses are for four voices and are very different in
style, soundworld and thematic priorities from the music
which inspired them. For all that, Guerrero’s lines are long
and sonorous, majestic and dramatic, without being declamatory;
Lobo’s are lighter, expressive. They might even be thought
imitative of the changes underway towards figurative polyphony,
particularly as Italian madrigals were developing.
So to listen, say, to the brief Guerrero motet, ‘Petre
ego pro te rogavi’, to respond to
its gravitas in phrasing and tone; then to work through the
more transparent Kyrie from the mass
by Lobo makes an interesting comparison. The mass is lighter,
immediately chromatic and
less ‘tactile’. Not that one need treat this CD as an exercise
in comparisons – development and adaptation are just as apt.
Ficta’s decision to stay with one voice to a part on this
recording has paid off. Each of the five singers (Moral and Vicente
are present only in three of the movements) is excellent:
clear in tone and articulation and bringing just the right
amount of expressiveness to the mass settings. There are,
though, the faintest of faint hints of a lack of uniformity.
For example this can be found at the very end of the Gloria in
the ‘Petre ego pro te rogavi’ mass’ and at times in
the entries in the same work’s Credo. Why no retakes?
The singing is so controlled - witness the way the Sanctus in
both works are allowed a jollity but a restrained jollity
- that such particularities are hard to put down to spontaneity.
ego, dicit Dominus is a simple,
solemn motet for Lent that relishes both the contemplative
life and the concept of self-realisation and development.
Let that setting make it plain - especially for those new
to Lobo - that he is no lightweight. For all that this
recording is dutiful to his textural filigree – there is a
text of substance, albeit restrained, to be attended to.
and beautiful music from which to derive pleasure and uplift.
Lobo lacks the depth or richness of Victoria, or indeed
of Guerrero but should not be ignored.
is not well represented on current CDs. A good place to start
would be The Tallis Scholars - again with Lobo and a Guerrero
inspiration: the ‘Missa "Maria
Magdalena"’ (Gimell 31). After a couple of listens to either offering, maybe
dipping into Guerrero’s own Missa "Surge
propera” (Gimell 540) - or for that matter any one of the
same ensemble’s Guerrero series, also under Peter Phillips
(Gimell), it will be clear that Lobo has a crystalline confidence that repays close attention.
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.