Pianist and composer 
                William Bland is at the time of this 
                recording about two-thirds of the way 
                through a projected cycle of twenty-four 
                piano sonatas, one in each of the major 
                and minor keys. The choice of using 
                the major and minor tonalities is the 
                result of the composer’s decision to 
                move away from the free atonality prevalent 
                in the music of the 1960s and 1970s. 
                The result is music reliant on styles 
                of the past, perfected by other composers 
                and is only successful to a slight degree. 
              
 
              
The opening piano sonata 
                is a pastiche of styles ranging from 
                Joplin’s classic rags to faux Rachmaninov 
                to the new age meanderings of pianists 
                like David Lanz and Jim Brickman. Although 
                the work starts off well enough, there 
                is nothing so fresh here that would 
                make one want to eschew the originals. 
                The watered-down Joplin and the abrupt 
                and disjunctive shifts in style are 
                jarring to the ear, and become quickly 
                tiresome. Bland as a pianist favors 
                a blurry, overly-pedaled sound, further 
                causing a grate on the ear. Combine 
                all of these quirks with the composer’s 
                tendency to write only accompanied melodies 
                - pleasant as they may be - and totally 
                to ignore the inner voices and you have 
                some very long and cumbersome pieces. 
              
 
              
The three shorter works 
                that split the two substantial sonatas 
                are so reminiscent of new-age elevator 
                music that one wonders how they got 
                onto a label like Bridge and stayed 
                shy of companies such as Narada or Windham 
                Hill. While none of the works are in 
                the least bit offensive, they are nondescript 
                enough to be quickly forgettable. 
              
 
              
I found the Sonata 
                No. 14 to be a bit of an improvement 
                over the first work, but again, the 
                lack of formal structure, the tendency 
                to note-spin and the random fits of 
                right-hand-only virtuosity wore me down 
                by the middle of the piece. These works 
                seem to me to be throw-backs to the 
                grandiose romantic music of the late 
                nineteenth century. Sadly, there is 
                nothing left in that idiom to say. 
              
 
              
Kevin Sutton