Aureole etc.




Nimbus on-line




If it’s the Czech works you’re after, do not hesitate

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


CD REVIEW

Some items
to consider

 


Enjoy the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra wherever you are. App available for iOS and Android

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage


Decca Phase 4 - 40CDs


Judith Bailey, George Lloyd


BAX Orchestral pieces


CASKEN Violin Concerto

Schumann Symphonies Rattle


Complete Brahms
Bargain price

 


Buy through MusicWeb for £11.00 postage paid World Wide. Try it on Sale or Return
You may prefer to pay by Sterling cheque or Euro notes to avoid PayPal. Contact for details

Musicweb Purchase button

Edward ELGAR (1857-1934)
Symphony No. 1 in A flat Op.55 (1908) [48:37]
Symphony No. 2 in E flat Op. 63 (1911) [51:16]
London Philharmonic Orchestra/Sir Adrian Boult
rec. 1968. ADD
2 CDs for the price of 1
LYRITA SRCD.221 [48:37 + 51:16]




Iíd always assumed because Boult was incensed at having been told to divide his violins for these recordings, and because by all accounts he threw one of his periodic fits, that these recordings were sub-par. The impression was reinforced by their long absence from the catalogues and by the existence of other recordings by Boult of the symphonies, some commercial and others live. Since Sargent was completely bypassed for studio recordings of the symphonies Ė an unaccountable misjudgement which live broadcast performances have thrown into pertinent relief Ė it was left to Boult and Barbirolli to dominate the field. Iíve always found Barbirolli more convincing in No.1 Ė in the earlier Hallé recording, fond though I am of the emotional Philharmonia traversal Ė and Boult in No. 2, a work that he did so much to revivify in the 1920s and of which his 1945 78s set is so supreme an example of his way with it.

Be all this as it may, critics would have stacked up these 1968 Lyritas against the two Barbirolli No. 1s and the LPO Boult of 1957. They would have duly noted Boultís greater fidelity to the score, as regards the later Barbirolli recordings, but the greater tonal warmth of the Philharmonia which does indeed play marvellously for Barbirolli, whatever reservations they may have harboured about his tempi.

Now that we have the luxury of so many years to consider, it remains really only to examine Boultís recordings in the cold light of critical day. If Iíd imagined they were sub-par I was wrong. I still donít think them the best of Boult. The 78 set of the Second from 1945, sonically limited though it may be, and the later EMI 1970s recording of No.1 seem to me to be his most outstanding statements of both scores. But what remains true is the tremendous symphonic grip and control exerted by Boult throughout both works.

The measured gravity of his opening of the First, is highlit by Lyritaís close-up concentration on the strutting brass, and by the colour often obscured in more massy, messy, congested performances and recordings. Solo lines emerge beautifully and naturally from the density of Elgarís undergrowth. And at 65 crotchets to the minute Boult approaches Elgarís demand of 72; with Boult tempi are linear yet infinitely malleable in matters of rubati, all the while predicated on the long line, on architectural verities, principles long handed down to him in the symphonic literature. His slow movement is nobly burnished but not as superficially affecting as Barbirolliís Philharmonia performance.

The Second Symphony is equally impressive. Boult had long learned that not all Elgarís voluminous tempo markings were to be followed to the letter but he keeps to the sprit of most of them. Therefore his opening movement emerges as a powerfully consonant piece of work, each incident properly related to the whole. Boultís performance is an argument in the strictest architectural terms, building the edifice from the ground up and having always in view the final pages, which he unfolds with unselfconscious and culminatory glow. Itís not the most obviously extrovert or emotive performance but it never releases its own special grip.

So, yes, the long unavailability of these performances should not have been equated by me with below-par performances in a fraught recording studio, if thatís what it was. Boult admirers have many performances of his on which to draw when it comes to the Elgar symphonies. These were not his first nor his last words on the subject but they sit wisely and well and not especially transitionally, in the corpus of his Elgar discs. In truth then not essential Ė but very valuable.

Jonathan Woolf

see also reviews by Rob Barnett and Stephen Hall



 


Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical

Hyperion

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Prťalable
Alto
Arcodiva
Atoll
CDAccord
Cameo Classics
Centaur
Hallť
Hortus
Lyrita
Nimbus
Northern Flowers
Redcliffe
Sheva
Talent
Toccata Classics


Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing
sample
 

Return to Review Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.