As before in my 
                  examination of the first commercially available batch of Pristine 
                  XR transfers, I’ll reprise my comments on Weingartner’s 1936 
                  Eroica for those unfamiliar with it and then get to grips with 
                  the aesthetic that underpins Pristine’s work.
                The Eroica displays 
                  many of Weingartner’s greatest strengths; the opening has a 
                  splendid drive - virile, lithe with clear accents, precision 
                  of chording and little variation in tempi. He is wise over distinctions 
                  between sforzati and equally so in terms of the trajectory of 
                  the movement as a whole. The funeral march however is the movement 
                  that will encourage most debate because here, famously, Weingartner 
                  ignores the stricture he himself made in his book on the performance 
                  of the Beethoven symphonies. The movement is certainly one of 
                  great - but typically not grandiose - nobility and restraint, 
                  the clarinet singing out with affecting depth, balance between 
                  string choirs splendidly maintained. But whereas he counselled 
                  specifically against hurrying at bar 69 et seq here he 
                  does pretty much precisely that – as he does in the fugal section 
                  – and he ignores his earlier stern suggestion of crotchet = 
                  66-72 by taking it at something more like 56-96, thus subjecting 
                  the movement to far wider tempo extremes than one would otherwise 
                  have expected of someone of Weingartner’s assumed sobriety. 
                  Whether one accepts his solution is an individual matter – and 
                  it goes, presumably, to show that prescriptive concordats are 
                  modified over time and through experience. Very few things are 
                  writ in stone. The scherzo though is wonderfully animated and 
                  the Finale splendid – crisp and dramatic.
                This happened to 
                  be one of the best recorded of the Weingartner Beethoven cycle. 
                  True, the acoustic was inclined to be a touch cramped and airless 
                  – “boxy” in the well-known terminology – but the immediacy of 
                  the performance was audible then and is still audible today. 
                  It makes a terrific impression, and packs a powerful punch, 
                  even now. Restoration priorities differ. In his Naxos transfer 
                  [8.110956] Mark Obert-Thorn did what in my experience he doesn’t 
                  often do now – he added a certain amount of artificial reverberation 
                  to soften the Vienna sound.
                The Naxos has more 
                  audible surface noise than the XR but, whether because of the 
                  reverb or other reasons, retains more sense of a room ambience. 
                  The lower strings – celli and basses – sound more charismatic 
                  and characteristic in Naxos’ work as well. More importantly 
                  the string choir balance seems more natural as well. Partly 
                  this has to do with a sense of bass overloading, or what seems 
                  like such, in the XR – though doubtless the rejoinder may be 
                  that we are now hearing things we didn’t hear before. Until 
                  that’s definitively proved one may justly have cause to wonder 
                  whether the conductor’s control of dynamics is being faithfully 
                  reflected. I ought to advise you, once again, to visit the company’s 
                  website www.pristineclassical.com 
                  and to consider the ramifications of their level of frequency 
                  extraction/intervention. What remains true however is the solid 
                  immediacy of the XR sound. Regarding the extravagant claims 
                  made for this new XR process you might want to read my review 
                  of the Thibaud/Cortot Kreutzer 
                  sonata for further details of the process. 
                Enthusiasm for this 
                  transfer depends on the level of intervention one welcomes. 
                  The use of modern reference recordings to “fill in” poor detailing 
                  in the original (percussion, bass line etc.) through graphs 
                  and the like, is scientific work and this was an approach Andrew 
                  Rose took in his Moeran Symphony transfer. This earlier Weingartner 
                  recording however will sound, according to taste, either very 
                  exciting or exaggerated - or maybe both simultaneously.
                Jonathan Woolf 
                
              Comment 
                received:
              In 
                his review of the new Pristine XR transfer 
                of Weingartner's 1935 VPO recording 
                of Beethoven's Eroica Symphony, Jonathan 
                Woolf incorrectly states that I added 
                artificial reverberation in my Naxos 
                transfer of this same recording. He 
                was probably thinking of the same conductor's 
                LPO recording of the Beethoven 4th, 
                which appears on the same CD, to which 
                I did add artificial reverb (due to 
                the extreme boxiness of the recording) 
                and stated so in my booklet note. The 
                bloom he heard in the Naxos transfer 
                of the Eroica, however, is on the original 
                discs.
                
                Yours,
                Mark Obert-Thorn