Apart from the Great 
                C major, the Schubert symphonies 
                are not on the same level as his finest 
                lieder, chamber music and piano sonatas. 
                Nevertheless they are delightful works 
                that should be in every collection. 
              
 
              
This disc is the first 
                instalment of a newly recorded cycle 
                from Bamberg Symphony Orchestra under 
                Jonathan Nott. There is plenty of competition 
                out there from a decade or two back 
                with the likes of Abbado and Marriner, 
                and Goodman on period instruments. There 
                is also a recent cycle from Sir Colin 
                Davis which Peter Lawson rated highly 
                earlier in the year (see review). 
              
 
              
Evan Dickerson clearly 
                did not like this issue, preferring 
                silence - which is, of course, wonderful 
                when you can get it (see review 
                ). My reaction was substantially different. 
                I found myself repeatedly admiring the 
                playing of the Bambergers and the recorded 
                sound was excellent. I have listened 
                it alongside other recordings I know 
                and love – Böhm’s Unfinished, 
                Beecham’s 3rd and Goodman’s 
                1st, and feel that this is 
                up there with the best. True, Nott’s 
                approach is not a traditional one, and 
                tempi are generally on the slow side 
                (except for the minuets in Nos. 1 and 
                3 which are fast) but I do not feel 
                that he wanders beyond the spirit of 
                Schubert. The earlier symphonies are 
                joyful works which lack great substance. 
                There are many interesting touches in 
                these fresh-sounding renditions, for 
                example the use of slight decrescendos 
                during the final notes of both works. 
              
 
              
New recordings of such 
                repertoire do need to look at the music 
                through today’s eyes and Nott is clearly 
                trying to do that. Most controversial, 
                I suspect, will be the first movement 
                of the Unfinished, which is taken 
                much more slowly than usual. How much 
                moderato does Allegro moderato 
                allow I wondered on first listening? 
                But this movement grew on me a lot with 
                repeated listening (at 16 or so minutes 
                a time – Böhm takes less than 12). 
                The Andante which follows is 
                lyrical and poised with lovely woodwinds. 
                Performed in this way the Unfinished 
                more clearly points to the 
                Great C major than is usually 
                apparent. Ultimately, I was convinced 
                by Nott but I do agree that playing 
                about 20 seconds of the unfinished third 
                movement ending in mid-air is not a 
                positive attribute. In practice, it 
                means you need to program it out or 
                be faced with a stark reminder of how 
                unfinished the work is, just when you 
                thought it had finished. I do not find 
                the material to be uninspired and rather 
                like Brian Newbould’s realisation of 
                it, which Neville Marriner has recorded. 
              
The presentation is 
                attractive: a thick booklet with nice 
                feel to it and an acceptable ratio of 
                facts per gram. On the front Klimt’s 
                marvellous picture of "Schubert 
                at the piano" (er ... what piano?) 
                is a good choice though sadly curtailed. 
                The Unfinished is here described 
                as No 7; at least Evan Dickerson and 
                I agree that No 8 is the normal designation 
                but no doubt that could also be debated. 
                The problem is that Schubert not only 
                didn’t finish No 7 in E D.729 but he 
                didn’t leave it in a state where any 
                of it could be played. Brian Newbould 
                has realised the work for performance 
                and it is included in Marriner’s set. 
                We can safely assume that it won’t be 
                part of this cycle. 
              
 
              
All said, this is probably 
                a disc that you’ll either love or hate 
                – if you get the chance, give it a spin 
                and find out. 
              
Patrick C Waller 
                 
                see also Review 
                by Evan Dickerson 
                
                Link to Peter 
                Lawson’s review of the Davis set: