It is odd that the three greatest large-scale Requiems 
                  of the nineteenth century - those by Berlioz, Verdi and Brahms 
                  - should all have been written by composers who were most decidedly 
                  in various ways at odds with established religion. This reflection 
                  is sparked by the fact that the booklet note by Klaus Blum with 
                  this release spends very little time discussing the music of 
                  the German Requiem itself, and instead spends four very 
                  interesting pages discussing the reasons why Brahms should have 
                  lost his faith in the immortality of the soul. Whatever the 
                  reasons, it is noteworthy that the name of Christ is never once 
                  cited in the texts that Brahms himself extracted from the Bible 
                  for his Deutsches Requiem; and it is also of significance 
                  to observe that Brahms actually rejected a recommendation from 
                  his friend Carl Reinthaler that such a reference should be inserted 
                  into the text. 
                    
                  Brahms’s agnosticism did not stop the work from being 
                  heavily condemned by George Bernard Shaw and others of his generation 
                  for its perceived pious religiosity, which was probably enhanced 
                  by the marmoreal speeds at which much of the music was performed. 
                  In more recent years the tendency has been towards more flowing 
                  speeds, enhancing the dramatic contrasts in the score. Some 
                  of the recordings which have adopted this approach have tended 
                  to throw the baby out with the bathwater, giving a misleading 
                  impression that the score is lighter in spirit than Brahms clearly 
                  intended in his heartfelt homage to the memory of Schumann. 
                  The greatest performances give due weight to the score without 
                  reducing it to ponderousness. 
                    
                  This is very nearly a great performance. In the first place, 
                  it has Mari-Ann Häggander, who gives quite simply one of 
                  the most beautiful renditions of the fifth movement that I have 
                  ever heard. She has the creamy purity of Gundula Janowitz (for 
                  Karajan on DG) with greater emotion and the poise of Schwarzkopf 
                  (for Klemperer) without any sense of archness. Her voice seems 
                  simply tailor-made for what is a deceptively difficult part. 
                  In the second place, Kegel’s speeds are close to ideal, 
                  neither too funereal nor in too much of a hurry, and the recorded 
                  balance between choir and orchestra is just about ideal. In 
                  the third place, Siegmund Nimsgern has just the right combination 
                  of implacability and humanity to make a phrase like “Und 
                  ich davon muss” strike directly to the heart. Finally, 
                  Kegel achieves precisely the right balance between horns and 
                  timpani in the opening section of “Dann alles Fleisch.” 
                  
                    
                  This last point may need some explanation. Brahms has really 
                  set performers an almost insoluble dilemma here. The movement 
                  starts with a slow sarabande which leads into a unison chorale 
                  for the choir. The sarabande then returns but this time with 
                  two added elements for rising horns marked ben marcato 
                  and an insistent triplet rhythm in the timpani. This then goes 
                  on to underpin the restatement of the chorale. If the conductor, 
                  like Klemperer for EMI, brings out the horns, then the timpani 
                  are relegated to a rhythmic background. If, like Karajan in 
                  his first (DG) 
                  recording he emphasises the timpani, the horns are reduced to 
                  a mere background in their turn. Rattle in his much-praised 
                  and otherwise excellent live recording for EMI 
                  gets the worst of both worlds, neither counterpoint being ideally 
                  clear. Kegel brings out the horns to begin with, and only then 
                  brings the timpani forward to underlie the chorus, which reconciles 
                  both elements perfectly. The problem however comes with his 
                  treatment of the chorale itself. He has clearly thought deeply 
                  about the words, and gets his choir to enunciate the text with 
                  precision and point. In doing so he breaks up the implacable 
                  vocal line which here should surely be set in sturdy contrast 
                  to the accompaniment. Brahms himself gives no indications of 
                  any dynamic changes in the phrasing - but then he rarely does. 
                  
                    
                  The same problem tends to arise elsewhere. There is a praiseworthy 
                  attempt to get the meaning of the words across, but this comes 
                  at the expense of a slight sense of ‘niggling’, 
                  of not being willing to leave Brahms to make his points in his 
                  own way. Better indeed that than a solemn religiosity. 
                  The pointing of the words is never unconsidered or inappropriate 
                  but sometimes the sense of the lyric line of the music is sacrificed. 
                  The recording itself is close to ideal in the balance between 
                  voices and orchestra, with plenty of instrumental detail coming 
                  through. The choir is not over-large, but the line is always 
                  clear. The depiction of the last trumpet in the sixth movement 
                  is dramatic and energetic. 
                    
                  This is not then an overwhelmingly great recording, but nevertheless 
                  it is a very good one - and well worth consideration at the 
                  budget price. Brilliant Classics are once again to be congratulated 
                  for their uncanny ability to spot a deserved reissue of a performance 
                  that at the time of its original release seems to have been 
                  comprehensively ignored. 
                    
                  Paul Corfield Godfrey  
                  
                  Masterwork Index: A 
                  German Requiem