The live performance of William Carragan’s completion of the 
                  Finale to the Ninth Symphony might for some constitute the principal 
                  attraction to this four-disc issue, but the main offering here 
                  is three of Bruckner’s most popular symphonies. These are live 
                  recordings of performances from three different years at the 
                  Ebrach Festival. If the name of the Philharmonie Festiva is 
                  unfamiliar to you, be reassured that it comprises soloists from 
                  the three main Munich orchestras, with the Munich Bach Soloists 
                  at their core. You may thus have no fears regarding its competency 
                  to handle Bruckner’s massive sonorities and complex counterpoint. 
                  There are no flubs or blips, just immensely elegant and homogeneous 
                  playing of extraordinary facility. The brass are especially 
                  sonorous but every section covers itself in glory. 
                  
                  The sound, too, is mostly exemplary in its clarity and definition, 
                  and only very occasionally slightly soft-edged, this being live 
                  and not subject to the highlighting of individual instruments 
                  to which audiophiles have become accustomed. The acoustic sounds 
                  more like a faithful reproduction of what you would hear in 
                  a purpose-built concert hall rather than the nave of an abbey. 
                  A couple of discreet coughs apart in the first movement of the 
                  Fourth, there is hardly a trace of audience noise and no amplification 
                  of extraneous noise. The engineers have succeeded in recreating 
                  Bruckner’s putative “cathedral of sound” in an actual church. 
                  The reverberation carries on for about five seconds once the 
                  music stops but it does not clog the texture during the actual 
                  playing. The brass blare brazenly, instrumental lines emerge 
                  cleanly without undue prominence and those rich harmonies and 
                  arresting dissonances, the result of Bruckner’s increasingly 
                  daring experimentation, are beautifully articulated. 
                  
                  Having reacquainted myself with a good few standard recorded 
                  versions, I conclude that there is something about the nature 
                  of Bruckner’s music which permits far less scope for the imposition 
                  of idiosyncratic or even wayward interpretation. The music seems 
                  largely to dictate its own momentum. Certainly there are far 
                  fewer discrepancies in timings amongst the classic versions 
                  than one might encounter in recordings of, say, Mahler. Gerd 
                  Schaller’s accounts sit firmly in a recognisable tradition of 
                  Bruckner conducting. He eschews excessive rallentandi and agogic 
                  distortions of the kind favoured by Jochum but is rarely routine 
                  or mundane. Just occasionally I felt I would have appreciated 
                  a little more attack and intensity in his delivery. The emphasis 
                  here is upon a stately sonorous quality where some rival versions 
                  find more tension. In the Ninth, for example, I have yet to 
                  find a recording to rival that by Wildner on Naxos for sheer 
                  majesty of sound in combination with propulsive momentum. Hard 
                  though it is to credit, the Westphalians manage a virtuosity 
                  to match orchestras of far starrier provenance. Good as it is, 
                  the weakness in Friedemann Layer’s recording with the Mannheim 
                  forces, is the occasional sourness of tone from the woodwind 
                  and scrappiness from the strings. Layer’s recording of the Ninth 
                  is not in direct competition with the Ninth on this set as he 
                  opts to use the “Samale-Phillips-Cohrs-Mazzuca” completion of 
                  the Finale (begun in 1983, finished in 1991 and corrected again 
                  in 2008). Schaller uses Carragan’s version. 
                  
                  Harnoncourt’s recording with the VPO of the 18 minutes of extant, 
                  orchestrated music up to the recapitulation of the chorale, 
                  provides sufficient evidence for the general listener to hear 
                  just how substantial, complete and extensive the supposed Finale 
                  “fragments” are and how feasible a completion is. Benjamin-Gunnar 
                  Cohrs proposes that 223 bars are missing from a probable 665 
                  of the Finale planned by Bruckner. Of those 442 are mostly fully 
                  orchestrated. Furthermore, there are sketches for those missing 
                  223, leaving only 96 for which we have no music. Carragan, however, 
                  argues that more bars are missing than the SPCM collaboration 
                  allows for. His version, completed in 1982 and here used in 
                  its latest performing edition from 2010, runs to 717 measures. 
                  It is the coda which leaves the greatest latitude for invention 
                  and it is there where we hear the greatest differences between 
                  completions. 
                  
                  I find myself joining the ranks of those convinced that this 
                  most transcendent of symphonies is best served by the addition 
                  of a Finale at least something like what Bruckner envisaged. 
                  The composer himself was clear that a finale was required, hence 
                  his suggestion that the “Te Deum”, despite being in the wrong 
                  key of C major, could be used as a default ending if he failed 
                  to live long enough to complete the symphony. It is equally 
                  clear that he intended in the Finale to reference themes not 
                  only from the preceding three movements but perhaps from preceding 
                  symphonies, too, confirming the Ninth as the summation of his 
                  life’s work. If you want this symphony to stop with the Adagio, 
                  you have no reason to abandon Wand, Walter, Giulini or Jochum, 
                  but they will not do once one has accepted the aptness and desirability 
                  of a Finale. 
                  
                  Carragan’s decision to provide more extensive links where Bruckner’s 
                  music is missing admits the possibility of hearing more of Carragan 
                  himself than Bruckner, whereas the relative brevity and fidelity 
                  of the SPCM edition admits fewer possibilities of indulgence. 
                  As such, it ends up sounding more consistently echt Brucknerian 
                  than some of Carragan’s more exotic elaborations. Conversely, 
                  Carragan’s greater inventiveness might be preferable to what 
                  some could hear as an over-reliance in the SPCM version upon 
                  a preponderance of descending ostinato figures of the kind we 
                  hear repeated eight times in the opening. For me, it all hangs 
                  together: the effect is of squadrons of golden eagles gradually 
                  descending. The succeeding lyrical section, beginning around 
                  15 minutes in, is strongly reminiscent of the Siegfried Idyll; 
                  we then segue into echoes of Das Rheingold, with a big, 
                  thrilling, brass fanfare at 18:34, a sudden silence at 23:30 
                  and finally a string tremolando crescendo. 
                  
                  Carragan’s apotheosis is a more conventionally linear pealing 
                  of great bronze bells but his original use of brass for the 
                  coda is very striking. Indeed, his orchestral colouring is in 
                  general more brass and woodwind biased and there is a certain 
                  amount of doubling which can make the textures seem a little 
                  thick. I like Carragan’s insertion of the “catastrophe chord” 
                  at 18:00 although some find it melodramatic and presumably either 
                  too derivative or anachronistic in its allusion to the screaming, 
                  dissonant outburst of despair in the Adagio and Finale of Mahler’s 
                  Tenth Symphony. The sweep, urgency and conviction of Schaller’s 
                  direction make the strongest possible case for Carragan. I have 
                  listened repeatedly to both Finales and must ultimately sit 
                  on the fence: I like the more chaotic, cumulative glory of Carragan’s 
                  more mercurial version but am equally in admiration of the artistic 
                  unity and integrity of the SPCM confection. 
                  
                  In concentrating on the Ninth and in particular the novelty 
                  of its Finale, it is possible to neglect emphasising the excellence 
                  of the performances of the other two symphonies here; they are 
                  superb in their own right. 
                  
                  Schaller’s tempi in the first two movements of the Fourth will 
                  for some represent the juste milieu between Tennstedt’s 
                  broader pacing and Jochum’s nervier, more erratic direction. 
                  His shimmering strings and mellow horns generate a marvellous 
                  sense of tense expectancy in the introduction to the first movement. 
                  The music seems to float in mid-air; once more I am conscious 
                  of how both Schaller’s conducting and the acoustic of the recording 
                  combine to suggest vast space, although Tennstedt still has 
                  the edge when it comes to creating a sense of inexorable progress 
                  towards the exuberant climax. The playing is flawless; Schaller’s 
                  steady concentration positively hypnotises the listener and 
                  we are swept along in wave after wave of refulgent sound. The 
                  smoothness of the lower strings in the Andante is a joy, although 
                  Tennstedt’s Berlin Philharmonic produces marginally more depth 
                  and resonance in their tone. Schaller’s horns in the Scherzo 
                  are effulgent, although the acoustic slightly takes the edge 
                  off their articulation. Perhaps to counteract that, Schaller 
                  could have asked them to imitate Tennstedt’s horns and play 
                  more staccato. Tennstedt phrases more lyrically in the 
                  quieter passages, but in the Finale it is Schaller who this 
                  time most successfully captures the suspense of the opening 
                  and builds to the first, splendid tutti peroration after 
                  only three minutes. 
                  
                  The Seventh has long been considered Bruckner’s most approachable 
                  symphony. It was certainly my route into a first acquaintance 
                  with his œuvre. Used to the rather thin sound on Karajan’s 1970/71 
                  recording for EMI – badly in need of re-mastering - I was immediately 
                  very struck by the burnished, aureate glow of the cellos’ ascending 
                  “dream” figure - actually a quotation from the Credo 
                  of Bruckner’s D Minor Mass - and the continued depth of sound 
                  throughout. The great chorale for brass and Wagner tubas in 
                  the Adagio is the emotional heart of this symphony and 
                  it is supremely moving in Schaller’s hands. I very much admire 
                  the way he dovetails the lyrical sections with the massive, 
                  funereal dignity of those passages echoing the cosmic grief 
                  of Siegfrieds Tod und Trauermarsch. The Scherzo is demonically 
                  driven, forming the perfect contrast to the preceding Innigkeit. 
                  Yet again, I was conscious of little details such as how the 
                  acoustic permits the flickering flute embellishments to pierce 
                  the warm blanket of orchestral sound. The Finale is majestic 
                  and delicate by turns, culminating in a glorious paean to the 
                  divine. 
                  
                  Other, individual recordings may legitimately lay claim to being 
                  superior to those here. I would not suggest that Schaller’s 
                  accounts excel those of the Fourth, Seventh and Ninth Symphonies 
                  by Tennstedt, Karajan and Walter respectively, but if you wanted 
                  a box set of three favourite symphonies played to the highest 
                  standard in best sound, offering the fruits of some of the latest 
                  scholarship regarding a completion of the Ninth, this 4 CD Profil 
                  issue is ideal. Listening to such dedicated, sensitive and musicianly 
                  performances of these three symphonies has re-ignited my appreciation 
                  of Bruckner’s sublime genius. 
                
Ralph Moore
                
See also review by Michael 
                  Cookson