A note at the front of the booklet includes the following statement 
                  
                  
                  “This distinctive recording of Mozart’s last great work can 
                  claim to be unique in two mutually supportive ways: the use 
                  of soloists drawn from the chorus, as in Mozart’s day – including 
                  young male singers for the soprano and alto solos – combined 
                  with the use of a period orchestra. These are no idle historical 
                  gestures. The contemporary virtues of this approach are a consistency 
                  in the sound-world between chorus and solo ensemble, and a homogeneity 
                  of style between period orchestra and period chorus.” 
                  
                  One virtue of this performance that’s not specifically mentioned 
                  there, but which should be recorded, I think, is the clarity 
                  of texture that results from Edward Higginbottom’s approach 
                  to this work. He uses a choir of thirty-six – 15/8/5/8 – and 
                  the orchestra comprises 6/6/3/3/1 in the string section plus 
                  pairs of basset horns, bassoons and trumpets together with timpani 
                  and three trombones. So the band comprises twenty-nine players. 
                  These forces produce an effect that is often intimate, though 
                  sections such as the ‘Dies Irae’, the tenor and bass passages 
                  of the ‘Confutatis’, and the ‘Sanctus’ are all delivered with 
                  suitable heft. 
                  
                  The internal balance of the choir is excellent, as is the balance 
                  between the singers and the orchestra. The choir does a very 
                  good job indeed throughout, not least the trebles who invest 
                  the top line with a fine cutting edge, though their sound is 
                  never harsh or shrill. 
                  
                  I like most of the speeds chosen by Edward Higginbottom. For 
                  example, the tempo he adopts for the ‘Confutatis’ allows just 
                  the right amount of breadth and he achieves a good sense of 
                  grandeur in the Sanctus without over-inflating the music. Perhaps 
                  the pacing of the ‘Hostias’ is just a notch on the fast side 
                  – the music sounds a bit too amiable – but I like the tempo 
                  of the ‘Osanna’, which is sufficiently lively but avoids any 
                  feeling that the music is being pushed too fast. 
                  
                  So, what’s not to like? I’m afraid that, for me, the performance 
                  has an Achilles heel in the shape of the solo quartet. I’ve 
                  quoted above the rationale for using four members of the chorus 
                  and I acknowledge the argument for authenticity. Dr. Higginbottom 
                  knows far more about such matters than I do but I would just 
                  offer the suggestion that, while Mozart probably did expect 
                  church choirs of the day to use their own members as soloists, 
                  the solo parts in the Requiem have a definite operatic quality 
                  – and dimension – to them. Might it not be possible that Mozart 
                  hoped that suitable voices would be employed to serve in his 
                  quartet? 
                  
                  As it is, I’m afraid the New College quartet disappoint. None 
                  of them sing badly but they just lack the tonal depth and the 
                  histrionic characteristics that this music seems to demand. 
                  I readily acknowledge the counter-argument that hearing Big 
                  Name soloists in this music is simply what we’re used to. Jonty 
                  Ward is a gifted treble, who sings with pure tone and spot-on 
                  intonation while Guy Cutting’s tenor has a good ring – he’s 
                  the best of the quartet. On the other hand the alto, James Swash, 
                  sings tidily but his tone is rather pallid while bass Jonathan 
                  Howard simply lacks the vocal presence that his part demands 
                  – the ‘Tuba mirum’ is a major disappointment. None of the quartet 
                  brings sufficient vocal character to the ‘Recordare’ and in 
                  the ‘Sed signifier Michael’ passage in the Offertorium the alto 
                  and bass parts only register weakly. 
                  
                  All this is a great pity since I’ve admired so many recordings 
                  by Dr Higginbottom and his fine choir over the years. This reading 
                  of the Mozart Requiem is interesting as a musical experiment 
                  and, as such, would have been enjoyable to hear as a one-off 
                  concert event but I’m afraid that, for all its positive points 
                  – and there are many, as I’ve tried to point out - it doesn’t 
                  stand up to the scrutiny of repeated domestic listening. It 
                  must be said also that at less than fifty minutes duration the 
                  disc is poor value for money. 
                  
                  If you are tempted, the recorded sound is clear and good and 
                  the documentation, which includes a detailed essay by Dr Higginbottom, 
                  is excellent. 
                  
                  John Quinn