  | 
            | 
         
         
          |     
            
   
            
 alternatively 
              CD: MDT 
              AmazonUK 
              AmazonUS 
              Downloads available from http://www.eclassical.com/ 
                | 
            Max BRUCH (1838-1920) 
               
              Violin Concerto No.1 in G minor Op.26 (1864-68) [24.17]  
              Romance in F Op.85 (1911) [8.30]  
              String Quintet in A minor Op. posth. (1918) [24.05]  
                
              Vadim Gluzman (violin); Sandis teinbergs (violin); Maxim Rysanov 
              (viola); Ilze Klava (viola); Reinis Birznieks (cello)  
              Bergen Philharmonic Orchestra/Andrew Litton  
              rec. Schloss Nordkirchen, Orangerie, Westphalia, Germany, September 
              2009, and Grieg Hall, Bergen, Norway, October 2009  
                
              BIS-SACD-1852  [58.04] 
                 
           | 
         
         
          |  
            
           | 
         
         
           
             
               
                 
                     
                  An understandable reaction to yet another performance of Bruch’s 
                  first violin concerto would surely have elicited much eye-rolling 
                  and a lot of invective from the composer, who always exhorted 
                  violinists to play one of the other eight concerted works for 
                  the instrument. As his biographer I can guarantee that. Yet 
                  I would be surprised if he did not like what he hears here. 
                  Vadim Gluzman, with a finely attentive accompanist in Andrew 
                  Litton and his responsive Bergen Philharmonic Orchestra, plays 
                  it superbly – it’s quite the finest performance I have ever 
                  heard, including Kreisler’s famous 1925 recording. While transitions 
                  to tempo changes may strike one as over-stated, there is immense 
                  detail, subtle, sometimes rightly unsubtle, nuance and robust 
                  energy in the playing, as well as lingering lyricism. Clean 
                  cut double-stopping in a Hungarian goulash of a finale peppered 
                  with spice and rushing to a headlong conclusion will leave the 
                  listener breathless. The central Adagio avoids sentimentality 
                  while giving full rein to its Romanticism in long-arched phrasing 
                  and sweet tone, this after a ruggedly presented Prelude (itself 
                  starting with an almost too inaudible pp timpani roll). 
                  This account reminds us of the timely arrival of this work in 
                  1868 between Mendelssohn’s and Brahms’ contributions to the 
                  genre, but more significantly it shows us how much Bruch was 
                  influenced by the former and in turn influenced the latter. 
                   
                     
                  If nothing else, it made financial sense for Bruch to make versions 
                  of his music for other instruments to play and while he did 
                  not (to my knowledge) envisage his viola Romance being accompanied 
                  by an orchestra, he certainly did offer a version with piano 
                  accompaniment. Pragmatism dictated the sense of doing so for 
                  after all there were and still are more solo violinists about 
                  than solo violists. It is a beautiful work, hard to programme 
                  because of its awkwardly short length but ideally suited for 
                  inclusion on a recording. One misses the viola’s lowest fifth 
                  from G to C which Bruch always loved in much-favoured alto register 
                  instruments (clarinet, cello and French horn were often prominent 
                  in his orchestration), but Gluzman’s fine playing is fair exchange 
                  in this very interesting and rewarding exercise - and there 
                  is always Gérard Caussé’s fine account on Erato of the original 
                  version for the viola.  
                     
                  At the end of his life Bruch - like so many other composers 
                  - returned to chamber music. At the start of his career in the 
                  early 1860s he produced a piano trio and two string quartets, 
                  but apart from a mid-life piano quintet in 1886, he wrote nothing 
                  else until two quintets and an octet all for strings in 1918/1919. 
                  They in no way sound as if the Rite of Spring was five 
                  years old, nor that Bartók and Schoenberg were well on their 
                  way to establishing themselves on the music scene. Instead they 
                  remain rooted in the 1860s when Bruch was writing his best music. 
                  Ferdinand David, Joachim and Sarasate were consulted when writing 
                  all his earlier works for violin, but they were all dead by 
                  1918 so it was now the turn of Willy Hess to take on that advisory 
                  role. The result is that the first violin is the virtuoso while 
                  its four colleagues (including a second viola) take on a comparatively 
                  subsidiary role (also true of the other quintet and the octet). 
                  Needless to say Gluzman rises to the occasion if not beyond. 
                  His masterly technique is admirable and recalls Ulf Hoelscher’s 
                  disc for CPO. If, as one would assume from a lack of a name 
                  for this ensemble, this is a put-together group who have met 
                  for the recording, one can only praise their blend and balance 
                  as well as unity of phrasing and control of passage-work.  
                     
                  This is an enterprising combination of works by Max Bruch, given 
                  superb performances by everyone involved, not forgetting the 
                  sound engineers and post-production editors Fabian Frank, Martin 
                  Nagorni, Hans Kipfer and Michaela Wiesbeck, who too often go 
                  unappreciated in our perception of the recording industry.  
                    
                
 Christopher Fifield  
                   
 
                   
                   
 
                   
                   
                   
                 
                
                
                  
                  
                
                 
                   
                 
                 
             
           | 
         
       
     
     |