Let me immediately make clear that this is a beautifully played 
                  CD which skilfully combines superb technique with an imaginative 
                  ‘recreation’ of a number of well-known works by Robert Schumann 
                  and Frédéric Chopin. Both the realisation and the playing reveal 
                  new depths for many of these pieces that are both entertaining 
                  and quite often moving. From this point of view alone, this 
                  release is well worth the investment. 
                  
                  From a personal point of view I always have a wee bit of difficulty 
                  with ‘transcription’. I guess that my main problem is: ‘Why 
                  transcribe a perfectly good piece of music, when there are so 
                  many excellent works in the catalogues that rarely gain a hearing?’ 
                  In this present recording, for example, why produce a transcription 
                  of some of Chopin’s Etudes when the original work by the composer 
                  is near perfect? Or why take a song-cycle and ‘create’ a version 
                  for piano solo? With the Dichterliebe, is the poetry 
                  of Heine not an integral part of the entire piece? Are we not 
                  in danger of losing the balance of tenderness, despair, fervour 
                  and anger that characterises the ‘original’ work? This song-cycle 
                  by Schumann was the earliest example of the genre that I heard 
                  and I treasure it as a masterpiece: I am not sure that I want 
                  it tampered with – no matter how effectively. 
                  
                  On the other hand, the history of transcription is full of masterpieces. 
                  I think of the many pieces transcribed by Franz Liszt – the 
                  Soirées de Vienne based on Schubert’s waltzes and also 
                  some fifty of that composer’s songs. Gounod, Wagner, Bellini 
                  and Rossini were all subject to reworking from his pen. So there 
                  is a great precedent for what Meinders has achieved on this 
                  CD 
                  
                  Frédéric Meinders partly addresses my concerns in the liner-notes. 
                  There appear to be three main elements to his programme of transcription. 
                  Firstly, the Dichterliebe is largely a concatenation 
                  of the vocal line and the piano part with very little creative 
                  additions. This piece has not been ‘souped up’. It seems that 
                  there are only a few changes of register allocated to the melody 
                  to make it playable. I must confess that it does work well. 
                  The resulting piano pieces (or is it a suite?) are effective 
                  and retain much of the emotional content of the original. This 
                  transcription does highlight some of the melody and harmony 
                  that may be obscured by concentration on the singer and the 
                  song. 
                  
                  The second tranche of transcriptions recorded here are for the 
                  left-hand. There has long been a school of piano composition 
                  that caters for this particular sub-genre: the sleeve-notes 
                  point out that there is a vast amount of music for this medium. 
                  Apparently some 450 composers have written some 4000-plus titles: 
                  this compares to a handful, some 75 only, of works for the right-hand 
                  alone. 
                  
                  I can easily understand the need for someone like Paul Wittgenstein 
                  (1887-1961) who lost his right arm during the Great War, to 
                  have piano concertos and other pieces dedicated to him by Ravel, 
                  Prokofiev and Korngold. However, I do wonder what is the added 
                  value of Chopin’s Etude Op.25, No.1 being dished up for left-hand. 
                  
                  
                  Thirdly, there is the process of‘re-creation’ applied to the 
                  Chopin pieces. Perhaps the inspiration for these came from the 
                  massive cycle of Leopold Godowsky’s 53 Studies in Chopin’s Etudes? 
                  Meinders has written that a ‘transcriber is transcribing the 
                  work as an homage to the original composer.’ He adds rather 
                  interestingly, but perhaps not humbly, that the transcriber 
                  ‘knows the work better than the composer, who may have written 
                  the piece in half an hour; the transcriber thinks weeks about 
                  making another work on it, based on the idea of the original.’ 
                  The basic concept appears to be that Meinders’ work ‘may be 
                  seen as an exploration of the possibilities of the piano, as 
                  well as a modernization or harmonies (when the piece can accept 
                  it) and as a contrapuntal exercise.’ 
                  
                  In spite of my misgivings - perhaps deriving from a mis-guided 
                  musical snobbery - I thoroughly enjoyed this CD. The pianism 
                  is excellent: the technical wizardry is obvious but not overstated. 
                  Nothing here sounds simple, but Frédéric Meinders has managed 
                  to create a genre that seems natural and not overly-pretentious. 
                  However, one word of warning: do not listen to this CD at a 
                  sitting. Take it a composer and a work at a time. There is a 
                  danger of being sated by this complex and bravura style of musical 
                  composition. 
                  
                  One last thought. Whatever a transcriber does to a piece of 
                  music by Schumann or Chopin or anyone else, the original is 
                  still there! So perhaps we should just sit back and enjoy the 
                  ‘new creation’ without worrying too much about the ethics of 
                  the process? 
                  
                  John France