Igor Stravinsky memorably 
                described Rachmaninov as ‘six-foot-six 
                of Russian gloom’, and that description 
                fits admirably, and at the same time 
                magnificently, with this music. It arose 
                out of Rachmaninov’s admiration for 
                Tchaikovsky. For Tchaikovsky’s only 
                Piano Trio, his Op. 50, had been dedicated 
                ‘to the memory of a great artist’: Nikolai 
                Rubinstein. Rachmaninov gave his Trio 
                élégiaque of 1893 
                the same dedication; now the ‘great 
                artist’ was Tchaikovsky himself. The 
                young Rachmaninov was already making 
                his mark on Russian musical life, as 
                both prodigious pianist and talented 
                composer. The dedication of the Trio 
                is a reflection of the strong impression 
                he had made on Tchaikovsky, the composer 
                of the previous generation whom Rachmaninov 
                most admired. 
              
 
              
The Trio is arguably 
                the finest achievement of Rachmaninov’s 
                earlier career: the period before his 
                breakdown following the disastrous premiere 
                of the First Symphony. It was preceded 
                by another piece of the same name and 
                for the same instrumental combination; 
                but in every way, in both scale and 
                conception, the earlier work is a pale 
                imitation of the later. 
              
 
              
Naxos couple these 
                two trios in a sensible combination 
                that gives commercial value as well 
                as artistic integrity. The performers 
                seem ideal, and so too the recorded 
                sound from that favourite venue for 
                Naxos: Potton Hall in Suffolk. The Trio 
                No. 1 is a work of sensitive emotion 
                and admirable intellectual command, 
                but the music lacks the vision and with 
                it the truly epic commitment of the 
                Op. 9 Trio of 1893. The latter is still 
                an early work, and it is true that Rachmaninov 
                returned to it fourteen years later 
                to revise it in the light of a more 
                sophisticated technique. Be that as 
                it may, there is a complete integrity 
                of design and an associated command 
                of structure, and its every bar conveys 
                an eloquent immediacy of emotion. 
              
 
              
Of course the performers 
                need bring their own vision to chamber 
                music that is built on such an ambitious 
                scale. This Russian trio of Grohovski, 
                Wulfson and Yablonski combine to achieve 
                eloquence of line and intensity of expression, 
                a performance that is founded upon techniques 
                of the utmost assurance. Their interpretation 
                is captured in an acoustic whose warmth 
                serves the music well. Make no mistake; 
                this is one of the most successful recordings 
                of chamber music one could wish to encounter, 
                and to have it available at budget price 
                is a cause for celebration. 
              
Terry Barfoot