MusicWeb International One of the most grown-up review sites around 2024
60,000 reviews
... and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here Acte Prealable Polish CDs
 

Presto Music CD retailer
 
Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

CD REVIEW



Some items
to consider

new MWI
Current reviews

old MWI
pre-2023 reviews

paid for
advertisements

Acte Prealable Polish recordings

Forgotten Recordings
Forgotten Recordings
All Forgotten Records Reviews

TROUBADISC
Troubadisc Weinberg- TROCD01450

All Troubadisc reviews


FOGHORN Classics

Alexandra-Quartet
Brahms String Quartets

All Foghorn Reviews


All HDTT reviews


Songs to Harp from
the Old and New World


all Nimbus reviews



all tudor reviews


Follow us on Twitter


Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
   
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Contributing Editor
Ralph Moore
Webmaster
   David Barker
Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger


alternatively Crotchet

 

 

Fryderyk CHOPIN (1810-1849)
Douze Etudes Op. 10 (1835)
1.
No. 1 in C major, allegro [1:55]
2.
No. 2 in A minor, allegro [1:22]
3. No. 3 in E major, lento ma non troppo [
4:31]
4.
No. 4 in C sharp minor, presto [2:16]
5.
No. 5 in G flat major, vivace [1:41]
6.
No. 6 in E flat minor, andante con molto espressione [2:53]
7. No. 7 in C major, vivace [
1:37]
8.
No. 8 in F major, allegro [2:23]
9.
No. 9 in F minor, allegro molto agitato [2:09]
10.
No. 10 in A flat major, vivace assai [2:14]
11. No. 11 in E flat major, allegretto [
3:00]
12.
No. 12 in C minor, allegro con fuoco [2:27]
12 Etudes Op. 25 (A Madame la Comtesse d'Agoult) (1832-36)
13.
No. 1 in A flat major, allegro sostenuto [2:25]
14. No. 2 in F minor, presto [
1:43]
15.
No. 3 in F major, allegro [2:04]
16.
No. 4 in A minor, agitato [2:18]
17. No. 5 in E minor, vivace [
3:24]
18.
No. 6 in G sharp minor, allegro [2:06]
19.
No. 7 in C sharp minor, lento [5:18]
20.
No. 8 in D flat major, vivace assai [1:09]
21.
No. 9 in G flat major, allegro assai [1:04]
22.
No. 10 in B minor, allegro con fuoco [4:29]
23.
No. 11 in A minor, allegro con brio [3:36]
24. No. 12 in C minor, allegro molto con fuoco
[2:29]
Trois Nouvelles Études composées  pour la Méthode de Moscheles et Fétis (1839)
25. No. 1 in F minor, andantino [2:05]
26.
No. 2 in D flat major, allegretto [2:24]
27.
No. 3 in A flat major, allegretto [2:04]
Allegro de concert in A major Op.46 [12:22]
Claudio Arrau (piano)
rec. No. 3 Studio, Abbey Road, London, June and September 1956
EMI CLASSICS GREAT RECORDINGS OF THE CENTURY 3 79988 2 [79:45]


These celebrated 1956 performances appear in GROC livery and that will surely occasion only a minimum of debate. Of course Arrau’s Chopin is powerfully personalised  in its partial abjuring of overt delicacy and lyricism it promotes clarity instead. This is a crude summary of the myriad complexities occasioned by his performances, though it remains true to say that this kind of performance sits at a complete remove from performances by contemporaries such as Cortot and Moiseiwitsch. 

Indeed it would be more enlightening to see how Arrau embodied the lines to thine own self be true. He first recorded a number of the Etudes in 1928 and ’29; the F major, Op.10 No.8, followed a decade later. They’ve all been collated on Marston’s invaluable two-disc survey called Arrau – The Early Years and listeners can hear how Arrau’s Chopin deepened and changed over nearly thirty years. One would hardly expect fixity or rigidity of him in any case. The F minor Op.10 No.9 is taken at exactly the same tempo in 1928 and 1956 but the results are very different. The voicings are very different, phrasing is more cumulative and long breathed in 1956, though the immediacy of dynamics in the answering phrases is more vertical and explicit in 1928. The C sharp minor [Op.10 No. 4] is more obviously virtuosic and externalised in the 1928 recording – later on Arrau’s tempo dropped, with the brilliant veneer of the younger self converted into a more considered and pliant reflectiveness. 

That sense of brilliantine varnish is very much audible in the 1929 Op.25 No.2. Thirty or so years later and we hear a tone more moulded and congruent, more expressive rubati and a subtler deployment of left hand voicings. The tempo naturally enough is also significantly slower and there’s far, far less of the whiff of showmanship about it. Maybe some will regret the loss, or diminution of these more externalised aspects of Arrau’s Chopin.

Certainly the rubati are more obviously capricious, as is the phrasing, in something like the 1929 A flat major [Op.25 No.1] which, at the same tempo as 1956, runs less fluently and more as a series of waves. Then there’s Op.10 No.3, which sees Arrau developing a sense more of objective nobility than his younger self – there’s now a plainer, less varnished profile. Exuberance had long since turned to sobriety in the case of the F major Op.10 No.8 – the altogether jauntier, extrovert and public performance contrasts powerfully with the more pliant, straighter 1956 recording. 

The Trois Nouvelles Études and Allegro de concert are very substantial bonuses indeed, eloquently played and entirely reflective of these levels of introspective clarity. 

Jonathan Woolf 

 

 


Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and keep us afloat

 

New Releases

Naxos Classical
All Naxos reviews

Chandos recordings
All Chandos reviews

Hyperion recordings
All Hyperion reviews

Foghorn recordings
All Foghorn reviews

Troubadisc recordings
All Troubadisc reviews



all Bridge reviews


all cpo reviews

Divine Art recordings
Click to see New Releases
Get 10% off using code musicweb10
All Divine Art reviews


All Eloquence reviews

Lyrita recordings
All Lyrita Reviews

 

Wyastone New Releases
Obtain 10% discount

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing

 

 

Return to Review Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.