MusicWeb International One of the most grown-up review sites around

 58,771 reviews
   and more ... and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here
Acte Prealable Polish CDs

Presto Music CD retailer
Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

Some items
to consider

new MWI
Current reviews

old MWI
pre-2023 reviews

paid for

Acte Prealable Polish recordings

Forgotten Recordings
Forgotten Recordings
All Forgotten Records Reviews

Troubadisc Weinberg- TROCD01450

All Troubadisc reviews

FOGHORN Classics

Brahms String Quartets

All Foghorn Reviews

All HDTT reviews

Songs to Harp from
the Old and New World

all Nimbus reviews

all tudor reviews

Follow us on Twitter

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Contributing Editor
Ralph Moore
   David Barker
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger

REVIEW Plain text for smartphones & printers

Support us financially by purchasing this from

Jean SIBELIUS (1865-1957)
Symphony No.2 [43:47]
Symphony No.4 [36:08]
Philharmonia Orchestra/Herbert von Karajan
rec. Kingsway Hall, London March 1960 (2) and July 1953 (4)
PRAGA DIGITALS PRD250354 [79:55]

Nowadays, in an age where there is a glut of Sibelius recordings to choose from, it’s easy to forget that Karajan was flying the flag for the composer at a time when his music was largely ignored outside of Finland, the UK and America. This release is a timely reminder of the excellence of the conductor’s early work with the Philharmonia Orchestra and it’s good to welcome these historic recordings back into circulation.

Karajan’s 1980 EMI recording of Symphony No.2 was a huge disappointment. Neither the conductor nor the orchestra sound particularly convincing. The reading is dull and unmotivated with a number of tentative entries just crying out for retakes. The finale is so slow that even the Berlin Philharmonic struggles to maintain line and momentum.

So how does this earlier recording from 1960 compare? Let’s start off with the timings.

1960 9:29 13:45 6:47 13:46 43:47
1980 9:54 14:37 6:43 16:34 47:48

The readings are broadly similar, except for the Allegro Moderato finale where Karajan had slowed down from a flowing tempo in 1960 to the laboured stuck-in-the-mud remake of 1980. The Philharmonia version is glorious, with orchestral playing of the highest calibre. Many would argue that this is the finest orchestra we have ever produced in England. The interpretation is thankfully presented without the hollow gestures of the later Berlin recording. It is a large scale romantic version with fabulous string tone and immaculate ensemble. There is a slight loss of momentum when Karajan pulls back the tempo at 8:30 in the second movement but this is a very minor issue. The Vivacissimo features a spectacularly recorded tuba solo and the recording is capped by a finale that is as grand as anyone could wish for, with the brass in superlative form. This is a great performance in natural, full bodied stereo sound that completely belies its age. It goes into the list of top recommendations.

Karajan’s 1976 EMI recording of Symphony No.4 is very impressive indeed but the orchestral tone is quite different to the earlier DGG issue from 1965. The previously undernourished and stark sounds are replaced with something far more romantic and lush. The symphony is still doom laden but in the slow movement the atmosphere is claustrophobic and neurotic instead of bleak. This is a massive, grand interpretation and it is special in its own way but rather different to the 1965 DGG.

So how does this version from 1953 compare? Looking again at the timings as a starting point:

1953 9:44 4:59 12:03 9:22 36:08
1965 9:56 4:47 12:00 9:22 36:05
1976 10:40 5:27 12:51 10:03 39:01

There is a striking similarity between the two earlier versions. Sibelius himself was an admirer of the Philharmonia recording. It is certainly the coldest and most desolate of the 3 Karajans on offer. The first movement also has an underlying menace matched by no other conductor. Allowances have to be made for the 1953 mono recording but it is beautifully balanced and the Philharmonia strings are sonorous and dark. The ear quickly adjusts to the lean, dry sound. This is a tough, intense reading that is well worth hearing.

There is, however, something for the potential purchaser to consider. These performances, in what to my ears sound like equally good transfers, are also available on a budget 2 CD set from Major Classics (M2CD009). This also includes a patchy 5th Symphony, Finlandia and an especially good Tapiola from 1952 and 1953, again with the Philharmonia (review). It’s a case of pay your money and take your choice. I can recommend both in equal measure.
John Whitmore



Advertising on

Donate and keep us afloat


New Releases

Naxos Classical
All Naxos reviews

Chandos recordings
All Chandos reviews

Hyperion recordings
All Hyperion reviews

Foghorn recordings
All Foghorn reviews

Troubadisc recordings
All Troubadisc reviews

all cpo reviews

Divine Art recordings
Click to see New Releases
Get 10% off using code musicweb10
All Divine Art reviews

All APR reviews

Lyrita recordings
All Lyrita Reviews


Wyastone New Releases
Obtain 10% discount