| 
         
          |  
 |  Wolfgang Amadeus MOZART (1756-1791) Arrangements for flute, violin, cello and piano by Hummel
 Symphony No. 38 in D major, ‘Prague’. K.804 (AE 546) [25:39]
 Symphony No. 40 in G minor, k.550 (AE 547) [23:33]
 Symphony No. 39 in E flat major, K. 543 (AE 548) [26:11]
 Uwe Grodd (flute), Friedemann Eichhorn (violin), Martin Rummel (cello), Roland Krüger (piano).
 rec. 14-16 Jan., 2010, Schloss Weinberg, Kefermarkt, Austria.
 NAXOS 8.572841 [75:29]
 
 
          Hummel’s arrangement removes the universality of Mozart’s 
            symphonies and renders a certain intimacy to each piece. In this CD, 
            the listener can appreciate what Eduard Hanslick describes as ‘the 
            beautiful in music’. Through these performances Hummel’s 
            emotional response to Mozart is felt. In lieu of Hanslick’s 
            theories posited in his book entitled Vom Musikalisch-Schönen, 
            Hummel’s art is recognised: ‘above all, as producing something 
            beautiful which affects not our feelings but the organ of pure contemplation, 
            our imagination.’
 Hummel’s adoration and respect for Mozart is evident in these 
            almost unwavering arrangements; only altering a few stylistic trends, 
            so as to be in keeping with the times, Hummel’s interpretations 
            are eloquent gestures to his idol. In keeping with the self-conscious 
            and at times introverted Romantic spirit, Hummel strips away some 
            ornamental embellishments to produce a minimalist and reflective approach. 
            As a friend of the poet Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Hummel appears 
            to be ‘Making music out of beauty, / With a question hidden 
            deep’ (April). These pieces form an homage to the majesty 
            of Herr Mozart; so much so that one can imagine Hummel using Goethe’s 
            words to confess that:
 
 In my music’s echo
 The starry host appear,
 Eternal feelings, bless, now:
 Sleep! What would you more?
 
 (Night Song)
 
 The quartet work well in the more sprightly passages — the tempo 
            is generally a little faster than when recorded as a symphony — 
            where the individual instrumentalists seem to meld effortlessly. However, 
            in the more pensive and slower passages, such as the slow opening 
            to the first movement of the Prague, the musicians sometimes 
            lose their point of connectivity and sound slightly out of kilter 
            and rather too tentative. As a pianist himself, Hummel dons the piano 
            with an added sense of importance. At once forthright and yielding, 
            its presence is both stimulating and consoling for both musicians 
            and listeners. In this recording, Hummel’s sense of coherence 
            and finely-tuned attentiveness is subtly recognised by Roland Krüger 
            who is allusive and suggestive rather than declamatory. Krüger  
            gives insightful impressions and glimpses into the tensions between 
            the Mozart originals and Hummel’s savvy interpretations. Often 
            given the role of provocateur, Hummel’s piano-line arrangement 
            in particular is intriguing and exciting. Unfortunately, this zesty 
            character is sometimes overshadowed by Uwe Grodd’s occasionally 
            wafty and glib swathes. Grodd performs best when structurally restrained 
            within the clipped staccato framework of the piano. When performing 
            the Presto of Symphony No. 38, Rummel unfolds the cello’s rustic 
            and smooth timbres which speaks of the attitude of the piece as a 
            whole. The final movement jostles between vigorous outbursts and lyrical 
            passages where the instruments both echo and offer contrasts to the 
            initial motifs.
 
 Originally composed on 25 July 1788, Mozart’s ‘Great 
            G Minor Symphony’ arranged by Hummel turns this often hummed 
            and whistled piece into something more contemplative and internal. 
            Described by Robert Schumann as possessing ‘Grecian lightness 
            and grace’, under Hummel’s grounding hand, this loses 
            its loftiness and becomes somewhat earthly. Most noticeably, the exchanges 
            between piano and cello in the Allegro molto transform a 
            supine melody into something acoustically coloured and textured. In 
            the Finale (played allegro assai), the ensemble 
            maximise the tension within rest beats and unpick Hummel’s exquisite 
            arrangement, highlighting yet merging the jagged tones of each instrument.
 
 The final piece, the Symphony No. 39, bursts forth with eagerness. 
            To follow Christian Schubart’s definition from his Affective 
            Key Characteristics, this is a piece which tells a story ‘of 
            love, of devotion, of intimate conversation with God’. By contrast, 
            in the Minuetto, a sense of youthful gaiety and femininity 
            pervades. Acting as an energetic interlude, this movement is played 
            with diction and delight. The quartet is in the faster movements both 
            careful and precise. At times the musicians seem marginally lacklustre; 
            however, the overall impression is one of commensurate technical ability 
            and good intentions.
 
 Lucy Jeffery
 
 Previous review: John 
            Sheppard 
 
 
 
   
    |  |  |                                                                                                                                            |