Giuseppe VERDI La Traviata - C MAJOR BLU RAY 723704 [RF]: Classical Music Reviews

Numbered eighteen in the Tutto Verdi (‘All Verdi’) series, La Traviata is the most popular of Verdi’s operas. It comes in at number two of all performed operas. It was premiered at La Fenice, Venice on 6 March 1853, a mere six weeks after Il Trovatore at the Apollo, Rome. This was because of the delay in completing Il Trovatore following the death of its librettist, Commarano before he had completed his work. Consequently Verdi composed parts of both operas contemporaneously, quite a challenge considering the differences in key, and particularly in the orchestral patina.

Even before this opera, the last staged of Verdi’s great middle period trio, the composer his fame assured, could, both artistically and financially, have afforded to relax. Giuseppina, his partner and later wife appealed to him to do so. His artistic drive allowed no such luxury. Whilst on a visit to Paris where the two enjoyed their life together without the intrusions at Bussetto, the composer had seen, and been impressed, by Alexander Dumas’s semi-autobiographical play La Dame aux Caméllias based on the novel of the same name. The subject appealed to him, but he recognised that it might have problems with the censors. Even before the choice of subject was made it was decided that Piave, resident in Venice, was to be the librettist for the new opera for La Fenice. Verdi put off the choice of subject until the preceding autumn, constantly worrying the theatre about the suitability of the available singers. The theatre in their turn wanted to get the censor’ approval of the subject to satisfy their own peace of mind. Piave produced at least one libretto that Verdi turned down before he finally settled on Dumas’s play. La Traviata was the most contemporary subject he ever set, embattled as he constantly was by the restrictions of the censors, something that Puccini and the later verismo composers never had to face.

Having spent the winter worrying about the suitability of the soprano scheduled to sing the consumptive Violetta, Verdi was also upset that La Fenice had decided to set his contemporary subject in an earlier period thus losing the immediacy and relevance that he intended. Verdi was correct in worrying about the censors and the whole project was nearly called off when they objected. As to the singers, all went well at the start and at the end of act 1, with its florid coloratura singing for the eponymous soprano, Verdi was called to the stage. The audience was less sympathetic to the portly soprano portraying a dying consumptive in the last act; they laughed loudly. The tenor singing Alfredo was poor and the baritone Varesi, who had created both the roles of Macbeth and Rigoletto thought Germont below his dignity and made little effort. Verdi himself considered the premiere a fiasco. He did, however, compliment the players of the orchestra who had realised his beautifully expressive writing for strings, not least in the preludes to acts 1 and 3. Although other theatres wished to stage La Traviata, Verdi withdrew it until he was satisfied that any theatre concerned would cast the three principal roles, and particularly the soprano, for both vocal and acting ability. The administrator of Venice’s smaller San Benedetto theatre undertook to meet Verdi’s demands. He promised as many rehearsals as the composer wanted and to present the opera with the same staging and costumes as at the La Fenice premiere. Verdi revised five numbers in the score and on 6 May 1854 La Traviata was acclaimed with wild enthusiasm in the same city where it had earlier been a fiasco. Verdi was well pleased by the success, but particularly the circumstances and location.

La Traviata is now recognised not merely as one of Verdi’s finest operas, but one of the lyric theatre’s biggest hits. In terms of its popularity worldwide it is second only to Mozart’s Die Zauberflöte in the canon of most performed operas.Much of the success of any performance depends on the diva in the title role. First she must look the part. Gone are the days when an overweight Violetta is accepted as dying of consumption in act three. There was hilarity at the premiere and such a situation today would bring even more adverse audience response when the expectations are for singing and acting as being vital necessities in the realisation of a role. Second, the Violetta must be able to bring off the diverse vocal demands of the three acts. In this performance Svetla Vassileva certainly has the figure du part. Add the opulent costumes and an appealing stage presence and she is off to a flying start. Each act of La Traviata makes its own particular vocal demands on the soprano singing the role of Violetta. Act one demands vocal lightness and coloratura flexibility, particularly for the demanding finale of E strano … Ah, fors’e è lui (Ch.9) and Follie … follie! (Ch.10). In this performance cabalettas and second verses are eschewed and this shelters her a little from the coloratura demands which, while being adequate, are not her strongest suit.

For the first scene of the second act a fuller tone of voice is needed, capable of wide expression and some power as Alfredo’s father confronts Violetta and turns the emotional screw. Here Vassileva comes more into her own in vocal heft, variation of colour and expression as she resists Germont’s demands that she forsake Alfredo. She stands up to him and wrings the emotion in Non sapette telling Germont how much Alfredo means to her and she is a sick woman (Ch.15). Then, after emotionally conceding she will forsake Alfredo, and being embraced by Germont, she acts and sings with even better expression and characterisation as she writes to Alfredo and deceives him, leaving him to meet his father, all the time acting with conviction in terms of facial expression. In act three she really rises to her histrionic and vocal peak, bringing taut emotion to her words and acting with her whole body. These qualities are particularly called on as Violetta recites the phrases in Teneste la promessa … Addio del passato (Ch.33) as she reads Germont’s letter indicating Alfredo’s return and she realises it is all too late. After Alfredo’s arrival, and their duet Parigi, o cara, with its echoes of their declarations of love in act one, when both singers caress Verdi’s phrases with real feeling (Ch.36), and after Germont has arrived and embraced her as a daughter (Ch.38), Vassileva pulls the heart-strings with even greater poignancy. It is one of the most heart-rending duet passages in all opera, as the soprano has to fine her voice as she gives her lover a portrait of herself, requesting he pass it to the virgin he will marryPrendi quest’e l’immagine (Ch.39), before finally raising herself from her bed for one final dramatic vocal outburst as she collapses and dies in his arms. If achieved with the vocal and histrionic conviction that it gets in this performance it is guaranteed to leave not a dry eye in the house; nor by the applause at the curtain and the flutter of handkerchiefs did it in Parma in 2007.

I have devoted much space to Svetla Vassileva’s Violetta, as her interpretation, together with the costume and sets, is the strength in this performance. As Alfredo, Massimo Giordano spends too much time in can belto mode, talking at Violetta rather than to her. The exception is the act three-duet Parigi o cara (CH.36) where he shows that he can sing softly and caress a Verdian phrase; together with his soprano this duet becomes the vocal and emotional zenith of this performance.

Vladimir Stoyanov as Germont sings strongly, but without much tonal variation and hardly looks the part. The verse No, non udrai rimpovera that follows Germont’s appeal to his son to return to Provence, is cut. Neither principal man is helped in the first two acts by conductor Yuri Temirkanov’s rather hard-driven approach, one he softens for act three and where he really milks the pathos and which adds to those tears.

The production directed by Karl-Ernst and Ursel Hermann goes back to the late nineteen-eighties and has seen service in several centres. The costumes are opulent, more fin de siècle than that of the composition, but wholly illustrative of the Parisian demi-monde. Some of the frolics in act one are over the top whilst that in act two scene two for the gypsy’s dance is rather crude and not particularly in tune with the music. The mise-en-scène for act two scene one makes up for a lot: I will not spoil the story with the detail.

A traditional production, in mainly colourful and elegant sets and costumes, is graced by a very well acted and sung interpretation of one of opera’s most demanding title roles.

Robert J Farr

See also review of the DVD release by Dave Billinge

2025 60,000 reviews and more.. and still writing ...	Search MusicWeb Here