One of the most grown-up review sites around

Search MusicWeb Here



International mailing

  Founder: Len Mullenger             Senior Editor: John Quinn               Contact Seen and Heard here  

Some items
to consider

in the first division

extraordinary by any standards

An excellent disc

a new benchmark

summation of a lifetime’s experience.

Piano Concertos 1 and 2
Surprise Best Seller and now

A Garland for John McCabe


DIETHELM Symphonies

The best Rite of Spring in Years

BACH Magnificat

Brian Symphs 8, 21, 26

Just enjoy it!

La Mer Ticciati







Plain text for smartphones & printers

Advertising on

Donate and keep us afloat


New Releases

Naxos Classical

Nimbus Podcast

Obtain 10% discount

Special offer 50% off

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
(THE Polish label)
Altus 10% off
Atoll 10% off
CRD 10% off
Hallé 10% off
Lyrita 10% off
Nimbus 10% off
Nimbus Alliance
Prima voce 10% off
Red Priest 10% off
Retrospective 10% off
Saydisc 10% off
Sterling 10% off

Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing

Sample: See what you will get

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Senior Editor
John Quinn
Seen & Heard
Editor Emeritus
   Bill Kenny
Editor in Chief
MusicWeb Webmaster
   David Barker
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger


Francis POULENC (1899-1963)
Concerto for organ, timpani and strings in G minor (1938) [22:37]
Joseph JONGEN (1873-1953)
Symphonie Concertante, Op.81 (1926) [34:52]
Berj Zamkochian (organ)
Boston Symphony Orchestra/Charles Munch (Poulenc)
Virgil Fox (organ)
Orchestre du Théâtre National de l’Opéra/Georges Prêtre (Jongen)
rec. 1961, Boston (Poulenc) undated (Jongen)

If you start bottom-up, a casual look at the performers might lead you to think that these two pieces for organ and orchestra are both conducted by Georges Prêtre. That’s true for the Jongen but not for the Poulenc, which he did record with Maurice Duruflé in Paris for EMI. The recording with Duruflé is certainly, by a long way, a better-known recording than Jongen’s 1926 Symphonie Concertante. In fact the Poulenc in this HDTT transfer is in the capable hands of organist Berj Zamkochian, the Boston Symphony and Charles Munch in 1961.
Munch first, then. This Poulenc undertaking was part of a familiar raft of French pieces that proved so stylistically compatible with both conductor and orchestra. It’s hardly necessary to elaborate on his Berlioz, Saint-Saëns, Debussy and Ravel recordings; more pertinent in this case, perhaps, is his command of the very differing idioms of d’Indy (Symphonie sur un chant montagnard), Milhaud (La Création du monde and Suite provençale) and Honegger - especially the Second and Fifth Symphonies. In fact both Munch and Prêtre in their own ways prove commanding interpreters of Poulenc’s Concerto. The recording, produced by Max Wilcox, was made in 1961 and has been transferred here from an RCA 4-track tape. The results are highly satisfactory, capturing the organ perspective with clarity. The elegance of the Bostonians Gallicised string section pays dividends throughout. The Très calme slow section near the work’s heart is especially effective, and though there’s inherent overload leading into the re-establishment of the initial Allegro - and indeed at a couple of places elsewhere - it’s not difficult to overlook this given how movingly the Largo is conveyed.
The Jongen is undated but was transferred from a 4-track tape. Since the organist is in constant motion one needs an executant of stature, for which reason Virgil Fox is on hand. The strings of the Orchestre du Théâtre National de l’Opéra are lean and attentive. Prêtre encourages lithe articulation in the Divertimento and is attentive as to dynamics and sculpting in the slow movement, where the quietly reflective music is well-paced. The florid, cinematic finale, a Toccata of rip-roaring vitality, is cast in the best Franco-Belgian style - no wonder fellow Belgian Eugène Ysaÿe was so complimentary about Jongen. The end is positively thrilling in every way.
These two works make a good ‘best buddies’ case, though they are expressively rather different and stylistically divergent.
Jonathan Woolf