One of the most grown-up review sites around
One of the most grown-up review sites around

Search MusicWeb Here


International mailing

Up to 40% off

  Founder: Len Mullenger

Some items
to consider

Yes we are selling
Acte Prealable again!
£11 post-free

we also sell Skarbo

and Oboe Classics


with Eggebrecht we get all the excitement we can handle

Book 1 Book 2 Book3
Mota The Triptych: -Website

Asmik Grigorian

Breathtaking Performance
controversial staging
Review Westbrook
Review Hedley
Every lover of Salome should see this recording
Mullenger interpretation

absolutely thrilling

immediacy and spontaneity

Schumann Lieder

24 Preludes
one of the finest piano discs

‘Box of Delights.’

J S Bach A New Angle
Organ fans form an orderly queue

a most welcome issue

I enjoyed it tremendously

the finest traditions of the house

music for theorbo
old and new

John Luther Adams
Become Desert
concealing a terrifying message

ground-breaking, winning release

screams quality

Surprise of the month

English Coronation, 1902-1953
magnificent achievement

Plain text for smartphones
and printers

We are currently offering in excess of 52,000 reviews

Advertising on

Donate and keep us afloat


New Releases

Naxos Classical

Nimbus Podcast

Obtain 10% discount

Special offer 50% off
15CDs £83 incl. postage

Musicweb sells the following labels

Altus 10% off
Atoll 10% off
CRD 10% off
Hallé 10% off
Lyrita 10% off
Nimbus 10% off
Nimbus Alliance
Prima voce 10% off
Red Priest 10% off
Retrospective 10% off
Saydisc 10% off
Sterling 10% off

Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing

Sample: See what you will get

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Seen & Heard
Editor Emeritus
   Bill Kenny
MusicWeb Webmaster
   David Barker
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger


Support us financially by purchasing this disc from:

Sergei RACHMANINOV (1873-1943)
Three Dances from Aleko (1892) [12:16]
Symphony No. 2 in E minor, Op. 27 (1906-7)* [60:38]
Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra/Vasily Petrenko
rec. 28 April 2012; *1-2 November 2011, Philharmonic Hall, Liverpool. DDD
EMI CLASSICS 9154732 [73:05]

Experience Classicsonline

The very first disc by Vasily Petrenko and the RLPO that I reviewed was their outstanding coupling of Rachmaninov’s Symphonic Dances and Isle of the Dead. In that review I expressed the hope that they would record the Second symphony. Now, some three years and several well-received discs later, they have done so. It seems clear that a symphony cycle is in progress because this follows fairly hot on the heels of a recording of the Third Symphony that I welcomed back in May 2012. In fact, my colleague, Ralph Moore selected that as one of his Recordings of the Year for 2012. In so doing he commented that the RLPO is “reinvigorated” under Petrenko’s leadership. I agree and this disc provides further proof of that reinvigoration.
Petrenko’s new recording is up against some formidable competition, including the classic André Previn/LSO reading. Another strong challenge comes from a recording by Valery Gergiev, which I reviewed not long ago. Since then I’ve been listening also to an LSO recording conducted by Gennadi Rozhdestvensky (review) which I’d overlooked and to which my attention was kindly drawn by MusicWeb International reader, Martin Walker. There are a good number of other recordings with excellent credentials, as a look at our Masterworks Index will show. The size of the field is in itself eloquent testimony to how highly the symphony is regarded nowadays after a long struggle to establish a secure place in the repertoire.
I think Petrenko miscalculates slightly at the very start of the symphony. The motto theme, which is given out straightaway by the lower strings, is so quiet that it’s insufficiently distinct. I played all three of the versions mentioned above at the same volume setting and in each case the theme emerges quietly but clearly. Actually, in the case of the Previn it’s too present unless one reduces the volume setting because his recording, made in 1972, is cut at rather a high level and, as a result can sound a bit brash at times. Petrenko is spacious in his treatment of the introduction and I wondered if he was a little too spacious but, in fact, reaching the Allegro at 4:46 he’s pretty much in line with Previn and Gergiev: Rozhdestvensky is a touch too expansive, I think; the Allegro arrives at 5:10 in his performance. I must say, however, that though the stopwatch might suggest otherwise I felt Previn’s conducting invested the introduction with slightly more of a sense of forward momentum than does Petrenko’s. Previn’s recording was one of the first to eschew the damaging cuts that many conductors had inflicted on the score - indeed, my copy of its first CD incarnation proudly carries the statement “complete version”. However, in one sense Previn’s performance is incomplete; he doesn’t make the repeat of the first movement exposition, which involves some four minutes of music. Petrenko, I’m glad to say, follows the example of Gergiev and Rozhdestvensky in observing the repeat. That can make the first movement very long unless the performance is a good one; Petrenko justifies the inclusion through the quality of his performance.
I enjoyed Petrenko’s account of the main body of the first movement though there were one or two instances where I felt he could and should have moved the music on just a little more; one such instance is Rachmaninov’s lingering passage - it’s lingering under all our four conductors - immediately before the development section. The development itself (from 13:13) is handled pretty convincingly by Petrenko and there’s a satisfying amount of dramatic thrust in the performance. The RLPO, reinvigorated by their music director, as Ralph Moore so justly observed, play keenly and strongly for him. Just once or twice Petrenko is a little too ready to indulge Rachmaninov’s temptingly indulgent phrases. One example that caught my attention is the passage from 18:56 where we hear once more material that first appeared in the exposition (at 6:27). I think that on its first appearance Petrenko took it marginally faster than he does at 18:56 and the fleeter tempo works better. The concluding pages of the movement come off very well indeed; Petrenko makes this passage lively and exciting. Overall, I think the first movement is a success and the performance competes well with both Previn and Gergiev. Though I enjoy Rozhdestvensky’s account, not least on account of the sumptuous LSO playing, I think he can be too broad in his approach to this movement. Significantly, his performance comes in at 24:30, whereas Petrenko’s and Gergiev’s timings are broadly in line with each other at 23:22 and 22:39 respectively and Previn’s 18:59 would be comparable but for the omission of the repeat.
Rozhdestvensky’s version of the scherzo is uncompetitive: his tempi are far too deliberate for my taste. The other three versions are all very exciting. Petrenko launches the movement propulsively, getting the RLPO to articulate the rhythms strongly. When Rachmaninov introduces one of his trademark longing string melodies (1:17) Petrenko gives it full value and ensures the music is warmly phrased. At the meno mosso (3:30) the fugal music is strongly etched though his fiddles aren’t divided: Riccardo Chailly showed the benefit of such an arrangement in his recent superb live performance of the symphony in Birmingham (review).
The RLPO’s principal clarinettist - who, sadly, is un-credited - makes the most of the famous solo at the start of the slow movement, playing it very eloquently. By contrast, Gergiev’s player sounds a touch reticent, at least as recorded, and the tone is rather narrow. Andrew Marriner is very fine for Rozhdestvensky; his tone is lovely and he leads the listener on through the long solo with some fine phrasing and super dynamic contrasts. Jack Brymer, for Previn, is not, perhaps, as daring with the dynamics as Marriner but his plangent tone conveys Rachmaninov’s tender melancholy beautifully and his playing is marvellously controlled; he remains in a class of his own. Petrenko’s player benefits from a better, more modern recording than Brymer and I love the silky tone. Petrenko is very convincing in this movement, for example building it to an ardent climax at the end of the first half (6:39). All departments of the RLPO play splendidly for him and I don’t think anyone hearing his account of this gloriously romantic movement will be disappointed.
The finale begins exultantly; Petrenko invests it with fine sweeping energy. After an explosive start Rachmaninov can’t resist another excursion down a lyrical byway. The yearning string theme at this point (2:50) is given full value by Petrenko but I like the way in which, even here, he maintains an underlying urgency. This reading of the finale is excellent and sets the seal on a very fine reading of the symphony.
I haven’t had the opportunity to compare this new Petrenko performance exhaustively against the competition, which I’m aware is formidable. However, against the three versions mentioned in this review, all of which have strong claims on the attention of collectors, I think it stands up pretty well. I feel my expectations have been met. The three dances from the one act opera, Aleko, constitute an attractive filler.
There’s a good note by David Gutman and the engineers - two separate teams - have ensured that the performances are reported in good sound.
John Quinn 

Masterwork Index: Rachmaninov Symphony 2

Support us financially by purchasing this disc from:







































































Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews


      Composer surveys
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site


Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure



Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Pat and present

Helpers invited!

How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips

Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Other links
Web News sites etc

A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.