This is a reissue of a reissue, the programme having appeared in a Brilliant 
          Classics box set (see 
review), 
          which was ‘strongly recommended’ by Terry Barfoot. Indeed, this is a 
          classic EMI recording (ASD3081), and seen by many as something of a 
          reference. My own musical DNA has been pre-programmed by that Classics 
          for Pleasure Dmitri Alexeev and mixed artists version which we wore 
          out in its briefer cassette form, but has been available with an expanded 
          programme on CD for a while now (see 
review).
           
          The Ortiz/Berglund performances are vibrantly recorded, and you can 
          pretty much ignore the 1975 vintage as regards sound quality. Perhaps 
          the strings aren’t quite as glossy or the stereo separation quite as 
          wide and transparent as some digital recordings, but with these pieces 
          it’s all about the sense of life behind the notes, and the musicians 
          here are as eloquent an impassioned as you could wish for.
           
          If I was standing in the record shop and you were humming and hawing 
          about which version to choose, then my advice would be to take Alexeev 
          
et al. There are two main reasons for this, and one or two 
          minor ones. If you check the timings of the movements in the piano concertos, 
          you’ll see Alexeev is shorter in most, and this is reflected in tighter 
          and generally more exciting all-round performances. Philip Jones as 
          solo trumpet in the 
Piano Concerto No. 1 is also not to be 
          ignored, the poor soloist with Ortiz doesn’t even get a mention. Despite 
          a gorgeous 
Andante in the 
Piano Concerto No. 2, the 
          slow movements are just that much more atmospheric with the CfP album 
          which has the edge in terms of absolute recording quality. The filler 
          
Fantastic Dances Op. 5 are intriguing little early pieces, 
          but you have so much more music at 72:49 that the choice is, alas, what 
          the ‘cool folks’ these days are calling a ‘no brainer’.
           
          Of the minor points, the transition between the 
Lento and finale 
          of the 
Piano Concerto No. 1 includes a wee break which shouldn’t 
          be there. This is like the gap you get between tracks when listening 
          on some MP3 players, and while it might seem a small point it does disturb 
          the flow of the music and is certainly annoying and unnecessary here. 
          There is also only about a 5 second gap between the two concerti, which 
          could easily have been just a little longer.
           
          Cristina Ortiz and the Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra play their socks 
          off throughout in this recording, and as a budget choice it has much 
          to recommend it. In the same price bracket I’m afraid it is however 
          beaten by Dmitri Alexeev by every measure and standard, though I have 
          to admit it is nice to have Cristina Ortiz’s performances available 
          once again as a single disc.
           
          
Dominy Clements
          
Footnote We are grateful to John 
			Shand has written to add some further background about the trumpeter 
			featured in this recording:
The review says that the 'poor 
			trumpeter' in the 1st concerto is not named. I guess DC's use of the 
			word 'poor' in this context is a reference to his not being named, 
			because the playing is superb. He is, of course, the legendary 
			Rodney Senior, Principal Trumpet of the Bournemouth Symphony 
			Orchestra for thirty-five years. He died quite recently. A 
			magnificent player. I lived in Poole for a couple of years in the 
			mid-1980s, so got to see and hear the BSO - and unwittingly at the 
			time, Rodney Senior. I have a friend who played trombone with the 
			LSO under Previn in the 1970s and later the Boston Symphony 
			Orchestra under Ozawa, and it was clear when I mentioned Rodney 
			Senior's name to him, how highly he was thought of in the 
			profession.