This is a recording which starts out being 
          about the instruments on which it is played, and ends up being more 
          about the music than anything else. The story goes that Alexei Lubimov 
          encountered an old Steinway in the Polish Embassy in Brussels which 
          is said to be the instrument Paderewski played in his recitals, and 
          its effect on his playing stimulated him to re-think Debussy’s 
          
Préludes entirely, even after 40 years of playing them 
          both in public and in private. This recording is therefore one performed 
          on ‘period’ instruments, but listeners need have no fear 
          of clunky old out-of-tune piles of what my friend Johan the piano calls 
          ‘firewood’. If it were not for the rich timbral effects 
          of which these instruments are capable, and which seem so in tune with 
          the vocabulary that Debussy intended for his music and reportedly demonstrated 
          in his own playing, then we wouldn’t be here at all - at least, 
          not in the same way. The first thing which strikes you is indeed the 
          rich piano sound, in the first book of Preludes a 1925 Bechstein which 
          is “clear, sharply-etched, translucent and light, even in complex 
          textures”, in the second book Lubimov plays the previously mentioned 
          1913 Steinway, which he describes as “divinely soft in pianissimo, 
          resonant and marvellously suitable for unexpected colours.” Both 
          instruments are heard in the arrangements for two pianos, 
Trois Nocturnes 
          as transcribed by Ravel, and 
Prélude à l’après-midi 
          d’un faune. 
            
          I am still highly impressed and somewhat under the spell of Roger Woodward’s 
          Debussy 
Préludes (see 
review) 
          which, lacking extras, fits onto a single disc. Not so long ago I also 
          chanced upon a copy of Paul Jacobs’s recording on the Nonesuch 
          label, which is also pretty miraculous, that is, if you can lay your 
          hands on it. Woodward’s impressionism is heavier on pedalling 
          than Lubimov, who creates atmosphere as well as maintaining clarity. 
          This is not to say that Woodward’s playing isn’t clear, 
          but he keeps us in a state of druggy wonder for longer periods, and 
          is seemingly reluctant to offer the contrasts of texture which makes 
          Lubimov more involving in the long run. 
            
          Alexei Lubimov might not be quite a household name to many, but he is 
          widely recognised as an insightful interpreter of classical and baroque 
          music, as well as being champion of new music, for instance performing 
          the Moscow premières of new works by Terry Riley and John Cage 
          as far back as 1968. Lubimov has been a significant interpreter of work 
          from the former Soviet Union, something in which he and 
Roger 
          Woodward share a common interest. 
            
          These Debussy recordings are remarkable for their fidelity to the letter 
          and the spirit of the composer’s intentions. The opening 
Danseuses 
          de Delphes is quite reserved and simple, and by no means the grandiose 
          chorale as which it sometimes emerges. I love the way Lubimov brings 
          out the jazzy elements in 
Les collines d’Anacapri, and 
          his tumultuous 
Ce qu’a vu le vent d’ouest is a genuine 
          assault on the senses.
Only because I happened to have a score 
          lying around, I point to 
La Cathédrale engloutie from 
          book 1 of the Preludes as an example of both aspects of Lubimov’s 
          playing - spirit and letter. Marked 
PP, the opening ‘ping’ 
          of the initial chord might seem a little heavy, but it ensures the sustain 
          which Debussy intends, the gently moving chords which follow creating 
          the true dynamic. You can really hear the 
marqué definition 
          where it is marked, the low C chimes are really stunning, the rests 
          in the outer chords just in advance of the 
Un peu moins lent 
          section at 3:06
observed minutely, the subsequent build-up seemingly 
          defying the decay of each note. The penultimate 
echo in advance 
          of the final coda is gorgeous as well, the memory of the main theme 
          carried over a rumble of sea in C. 
            
          If it’s orchestral piano you are looking for then the duo works 
          which divide the books of Preludes are something special. Joined by 
          his student and colleague Alexei Zuev, the 
Prélude à 
          l’après-midi d’un faune in particular is a stunning 
          example of how far two pianos can go in emulating a full orchestra. 
          Admittedly it is the imagination, already infused with Debussy’s 
          superb original orchestration, which adds extra layers of meaning to 
          these piano sounds, but even without such associations I think we would 
          accept this as a tremendous evocation and musical statement - perfectly 
          suited to these instruments. 
            
          I have no doubt you could go through every piece and extrapolate significant 
          observations, but the bottom line is that these are very fine performances 
          indeed, and these venerable old grand pianos are very much alive and 
          part of the entire creative process. The Steinway for the second book 
          of Preludes is rather special indeed, warmly coloured, but with a depth 
          and breadth of colour which expands the meaning and implication of the 
          word resonance in this context. There is a fluid connection between 
          registers in this piano which admits difference and contrast between 
          low, middle and high, but which also connects and relates each in some 
          intangible way which seems to set it apart from many a modern instrument. 
          I am neither for nor against old or new when it comes to instruments 
          of any kind, but I’ve heard and played enough different pianos 
          to know how individual and special their characters can be. Here is 
          a sound in which you can revel just as Lubimov clearly does, and absorb 
          the different character of Debussy’s works as if by osmosis, from 
          the melancholy of 
Feuilles mortes to the quirky 
“Général 
          Lavine” - eccentric and lampooning of London’s pride 
          in the 
Hommage à S. Pickwick Esq. P.P.M.P.C. Yes indeed, 
          there is great fun to be had here as well as a kind of total immersion 
          in the shimmering imagery and seriousness of expression in these works 
          which can sometimes make a rainy day seem even darker and wetter. The 
          
Feux d’artifice with which the cycle finishes is like an 
          entire re-birth - we can all start re-thinking our Debussy after this 
          recording, and the goalposts and boundary markers have all been picked 
          up and moved yet again. 
            
          Beautifully presented in stylishly minimalist monochrome and provided 
          with excellent booklet notes by Jürg Stenzl and a personal comment 
          by Alexei Lubimov, this is a set to treasure and avoid getting covered 
          in coffee stains and fingerprints at all costs. It commands respect 
          and oozes quality on all fronts, and I’m already shortlisting 
          it for disc of the decade, let alone the year. 
            
          
Dominy Clements